view mercurial/rewriteutil.py @ 37631:2f626233859b

wireproto: implement batching on peer executor interface This is a bit more complicated than non-batch requests because we need to buffer sends until the last request arrives *and* we need to support resolving futures as data arrives from the remote. In a classical concurrent.futures executor model, the future "starts" as soon as it is submitted. However, we have nothing to start until the last command is submitted. If we did nothing, calling result() would deadlock, since the future hasn't "started." So in the case where we queue the command, we return a special future type whose result() will trigger sendcommands(). This eliminates the deadlock potential. It also serves as a check against callers who may be calling result() prematurely, as it will prevent any subsequent callcommands() from working. This behavior is slightly annoying and a bit restrictive. But it's the world that half duplex connections forces on us. In order to support streaming responses, we were previously using a generator. But with a futures-based API, we're using futures and not generators. So in order to get streaming, we need a background thread to read data from the server. The approach taken in this patch is to leverage the ThreadPoolExecutor from concurrent.futures for managing a background thread. We create an executor and future that resolves when all response data is processed (or an error occurs). When exiting the context manager, we wait on that background reading before returning. I was hoping we could manually spin up a threading.Thread and this would be simple. But I ran into a few deadlocks when implementing. After looking at the source code to concurrent.futures, I figured it would just be easier to use a ThreadPoolExecutor than implement all the code needed to manually manage a thread. To prove this works, a use of the batch API in discovery has been updated. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D3269
author Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com>
date Fri, 13 Apr 2018 11:02:34 -0700
parents 490df753894d
children 8c6329fa6038
line wrap: on
line source

# rewriteutil.py - utility functions for rewriting changesets
#
# Copyright 2017 Octobus <contact@octobus.net>
#
# This software may be used and distributed according to the terms of the
# GNU General Public License version 2 or any later version.

from __future__ import absolute_import

from .i18n import _

from . import (
    error,
    node,
    obsolete,
    revset,
)

def precheck(repo, revs, action='rewrite'):
    """check if revs can be rewritten
    action is used to control the error message.

    Make sure this function is called after taking the lock.
    """
    if node.nullrev in revs:
        msg = _("cannot %s null changeset") % (action)
        hint = _("no changeset checked out")
        raise error.Abort(msg, hint=hint)

    publicrevs = repo.revs('%ld and public()', revs)
    if len(repo[None].parents()) > 1:
        raise error.Abort(_("cannot %s while merging") % action)

    if publicrevs:
        msg = _("cannot %s public changesets") % (action)
        hint = _("see 'hg help phases' for details")
        raise error.Abort(msg, hint=hint)

    newunstable = disallowednewunstable(repo, revs)
    if newunstable:
        raise error.Abort(_("cannot %s changeset with children") % action)

def disallowednewunstable(repo, revs):
    """Checks whether editing the revs will create new unstable changesets and
    are we allowed to create them.

    To allow new unstable changesets, set the config:
        `experimental.evolution.allowunstable=True`
    """
    allowunstable = obsolete.isenabled(repo, obsolete.allowunstableopt)
    if allowunstable:
        return revset.baseset()
    return repo.revs("(%ld::) - %ld", revs, revs)