view tests/test-bisect2.t @ 37631:2f626233859b

wireproto: implement batching on peer executor interface This is a bit more complicated than non-batch requests because we need to buffer sends until the last request arrives *and* we need to support resolving futures as data arrives from the remote. In a classical concurrent.futures executor model, the future "starts" as soon as it is submitted. However, we have nothing to start until the last command is submitted. If we did nothing, calling result() would deadlock, since the future hasn't "started." So in the case where we queue the command, we return a special future type whose result() will trigger sendcommands(). This eliminates the deadlock potential. It also serves as a check against callers who may be calling result() prematurely, as it will prevent any subsequent callcommands() from working. This behavior is slightly annoying and a bit restrictive. But it's the world that half duplex connections forces on us. In order to support streaming responses, we were previously using a generator. But with a futures-based API, we're using futures and not generators. So in order to get streaming, we need a background thread to read data from the server. The approach taken in this patch is to leverage the ThreadPoolExecutor from concurrent.futures for managing a background thread. We create an executor and future that resolves when all response data is processed (or an error occurs). When exiting the context manager, we wait on that background reading before returning. I was hoping we could manually spin up a threading.Thread and this would be simple. But I ran into a few deadlocks when implementing. After looking at the source code to concurrent.futures, I figured it would just be easier to use a ThreadPoolExecutor than implement all the code needed to manually manage a thread. To prove this works, a use of the batch API in discovery has been updated. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D3269
author Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com>
date Fri, 13 Apr 2018 11:02:34 -0700
parents 1b5c61d38a52
children f51ff655d338
line wrap: on
line source

# The tests in test-bisect are done on a linear history. Here the
# following repository history is used for testing:
#
#                      17
#                       |
#                18    16
#                  \  /
#                   15
#                  /  \
#                 /    \
#               10     13
#               / \     |
#              /   \    |  14
#         7   6     9  12 /
#          \ / \    |   |/
#           4   \   |  11
#            \   \  |  /
#             3   5 | /
#              \ /  |/
#               2   8
#                \ /
#                 1
#                 |
#                 0

init

  $ hg init

committing changes

  $ echo > a
  $ echo '0' >> a
  $ hg add a
  $ hg ci -m "0" -d "0 0"
  $ echo '1' >> a
  $ hg ci -m "1" -d "1 0"
  $ echo '2' >> a
  $ hg ci -m "2" -d "2 0"
  $ echo '3' >> a
  $ hg ci -m "3" -d "3 0"
  $ echo '4' >> a
  $ hg ci -m "4" -d "4 0"

create branch

  $ hg up -r 2
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ echo '5' >> b
  $ hg add b
  $ hg ci -m "5" -d "5 0"
  created new head

merge

  $ hg merge
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (branch merge, don't forget to commit)
  $ hg ci -m "merge 4,5" -d "6 0"

create branch

  $ hg up -r 4
  0 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ echo '7' > c
  $ hg add c
  $ hg ci -m "7" -d "7 0"
  created new head

create branch

  $ hg up -r 1
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ echo '8' > d
  $ hg add d
  $ hg ci -m "8" -d "8 0"
  created new head
  $ echo '9' >> d
  $ hg ci -m "9" -d "9 0"

merge

  $ hg merge -r 6
  2 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (branch merge, don't forget to commit)
  $ hg ci -m "merge 6,9" -d "10 0"

create branch

  $ hg up -r 8
  2 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ echo '11' > e
  $ hg add e
  $ hg ci -m "11" -d "11 0"
  created new head
  $ echo '12' >> e
  $ hg ci -m "12" -d "12 0"
  $ echo '13' >> e
  $ hg ci -m "13" -d "13 0"

create branch

  $ hg up -r 11
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ echo '14' > f
  $ hg add f
  $ hg ci -m "14" -d "14 0"
  created new head

merge

  $ hg up -r 13 -C
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ hg merge -r 10
  3 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (branch merge, don't forget to commit)
  $ hg ci -m "merge 10,13" -d "15 0"
  $ echo '16' >> e
  $ hg ci -m "16" -d "16 0"
  $ echo '17' >> e
  $ hg ci -m "17" -d "17 0"

create branch

  $ hg up -r 15
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ echo '18' >> e
  $ hg ci -m "18" -d "18 0"
  created new head

log

  $ hg log
  changeset:   18:d42e18c7bc9b
  tag:         tip
  parent:      15:857b178a7cf3
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:18 1970 +0000
  summary:     18
  
  changeset:   17:228c06deef46
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:17 1970 +0000
  summary:     17
  
  changeset:   16:609d82a7ebae
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:16 1970 +0000
  summary:     16
  
  changeset:   15:857b178a7cf3
  parent:      13:b0a32c86eb31
  parent:      10:429fcd26f52d
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:15 1970 +0000
  summary:     merge 10,13
  
  changeset:   14:faa450606157
  parent:      11:82ca6f06eccd
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:14 1970 +0000
  summary:     14
  
  changeset:   13:b0a32c86eb31
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:13 1970 +0000
  summary:     13
  
  changeset:   12:9f259202bbe7
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:12 1970 +0000
  summary:     12
  
  changeset:   11:82ca6f06eccd
  parent:      8:dab8161ac8fc
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:11 1970 +0000
  summary:     11
  
  changeset:   10:429fcd26f52d
  parent:      9:3c77083deb4a
  parent:      6:a214d5d3811a
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:10 1970 +0000
  summary:     merge 6,9
  
  changeset:   9:3c77083deb4a
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:09 1970 +0000
  summary:     9
  
  changeset:   8:dab8161ac8fc
  parent:      1:4ca5088da217
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:08 1970 +0000
  summary:     8
  
  changeset:   7:50c76098bbf2
  parent:      4:5c668c22234f
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:07 1970 +0000
  summary:     7
  
  changeset:   6:a214d5d3811a
  parent:      5:385a529b6670
  parent:      4:5c668c22234f
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:06 1970 +0000
  summary:     merge 4,5
  
  changeset:   5:385a529b6670
  parent:      2:051e12f87bf1
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:05 1970 +0000
  summary:     5
  
  changeset:   4:5c668c22234f
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:04 1970 +0000
  summary:     4
  
  changeset:   3:0950834f0a9c
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:03 1970 +0000
  summary:     3
  
  changeset:   2:051e12f87bf1
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:02 1970 +0000
  summary:     2
  
  changeset:   1:4ca5088da217
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:01 1970 +0000
  summary:     1
  
  changeset:   0:33b1f9bc8bc5
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
  summary:     0
  

hg up -C

  $ hg up -C
  0 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  updated to "d42e18c7bc9b: 18"
  3 other heads for branch "default"

complex bisect test 1  # first bad rev is 9

  $ hg bisect -r
  $ hg bisect -g 0
  $ hg bisect -b 17   # -> update to rev 6
  Testing changeset 6:a214d5d3811a (15 changesets remaining, ~3 tests)
  0 files updated, 0 files merged, 2 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(pruned)'
  0:33b1f9bc8bc5
  17:228c06deef46
  $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(untested)'
  1:4ca5088da217
  2:051e12f87bf1
  3:0950834f0a9c
  4:5c668c22234f
  5:385a529b6670
  6:a214d5d3811a
  8:dab8161ac8fc
  9:3c77083deb4a
  10:429fcd26f52d
  11:82ca6f06eccd
  12:9f259202bbe7
  13:b0a32c86eb31
  15:857b178a7cf3
  16:609d82a7ebae
  $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(ignored)'
  $ hg bisect -g      # -> update to rev 13
  Testing changeset 13:b0a32c86eb31 (9 changesets remaining, ~3 tests)
  3 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ hg bisect -s      # -> update to rev 10
  Testing changeset 10:429fcd26f52d (9 changesets remaining, ~3 tests)
  3 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ hg bisect -b      # -> update to rev 8
  Testing changeset 8:dab8161ac8fc (3 changesets remaining, ~1 tests)
  2 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ hg bisect -g      # -> update to rev 9
  Testing changeset 9:3c77083deb4a (2 changesets remaining, ~1 tests)
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ hg bisect -b
  The first bad revision is:
  changeset:   9:3c77083deb4a
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:09 1970 +0000
  summary:     9
  
  $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(range)'
  0:33b1f9bc8bc5
  1:4ca5088da217
  2:051e12f87bf1
  3:0950834f0a9c
  4:5c668c22234f
  5:385a529b6670
  6:a214d5d3811a
  8:dab8161ac8fc
  9:3c77083deb4a
  10:429fcd26f52d
  11:82ca6f06eccd
  12:9f259202bbe7
  13:b0a32c86eb31
  15:857b178a7cf3
  16:609d82a7ebae
  17:228c06deef46
  $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(pruned)'
  0:33b1f9bc8bc5
  1:4ca5088da217
  2:051e12f87bf1
  3:0950834f0a9c
  4:5c668c22234f
  5:385a529b6670
  6:a214d5d3811a
  8:dab8161ac8fc
  9:3c77083deb4a
  10:429fcd26f52d
  13:b0a32c86eb31
  15:857b178a7cf3
  16:609d82a7ebae
  17:228c06deef46
  18:d42e18c7bc9b
  $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(untested)'
  11:82ca6f06eccd
  12:9f259202bbe7
  $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(goods)'
  0:33b1f9bc8bc5
  1:4ca5088da217
  2:051e12f87bf1
  3:0950834f0a9c
  4:5c668c22234f
  5:385a529b6670
  6:a214d5d3811a
  8:dab8161ac8fc
  $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(bads)'
  9:3c77083deb4a
  10:429fcd26f52d
  15:857b178a7cf3
  16:609d82a7ebae
  17:228c06deef46
  18:d42e18c7bc9b

complex bisect test 2  # first good rev is 13

  $ hg bisect -r
  $ hg bisect -g 18
  $ hg bisect -b 1    # -> update to rev 6
  Testing changeset 6:a214d5d3811a (13 changesets remaining, ~3 tests)
  2 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ hg bisect -s      # -> update to rev 10
  Testing changeset 10:429fcd26f52d (13 changesets remaining, ~3 tests)
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(pruned)'
  0:33b1f9bc8bc5
  1:4ca5088da217
  6:a214d5d3811a
  18:d42e18c7bc9b
  $ hg bisect -b      # -> update to rev 12
  Testing changeset 12:9f259202bbe7 (5 changesets remaining, ~2 tests)
  3 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(pruned)'
  0:33b1f9bc8bc5
  1:4ca5088da217
  2:051e12f87bf1
  3:0950834f0a9c
  4:5c668c22234f
  5:385a529b6670
  6:a214d5d3811a
  8:dab8161ac8fc
  9:3c77083deb4a
  10:429fcd26f52d
  18:d42e18c7bc9b
  $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(untested)'
  11:82ca6f06eccd
  12:9f259202bbe7
  13:b0a32c86eb31
  15:857b178a7cf3
  $ hg bisect -b      # -> update to rev 13
  Testing changeset 13:b0a32c86eb31 (3 changesets remaining, ~1 tests)
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ hg bisect -g
  The first good revision is:
  changeset:   13:b0a32c86eb31
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:13 1970 +0000
  summary:     13
  
  $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(range)'
  1:4ca5088da217
  2:051e12f87bf1
  3:0950834f0a9c
  4:5c668c22234f
  5:385a529b6670
  6:a214d5d3811a
  8:dab8161ac8fc
  9:3c77083deb4a
  10:429fcd26f52d
  11:82ca6f06eccd
  12:9f259202bbe7
  13:b0a32c86eb31
  15:857b178a7cf3
  18:d42e18c7bc9b

complex bisect test 3

first bad rev is 15
10,9,13 are skipped an might be the first bad revisions as well

  $ hg bisect -r
  $ hg bisect -g 1
  $ hg bisect -b 16   # -> update to rev 6
  Testing changeset 6:a214d5d3811a (13 changesets remaining, ~3 tests)
  2 files updated, 0 files merged, 2 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(pruned)'
  0:33b1f9bc8bc5
  1:4ca5088da217
  16:609d82a7ebae
  17:228c06deef46
  $ hg bisect -g      # -> update to rev 13
  Testing changeset 13:b0a32c86eb31 (8 changesets remaining, ~3 tests)
  3 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ hg bisect -s      # -> update to rev 10
  Testing changeset 10:429fcd26f52d (8 changesets remaining, ~3 tests)
  3 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ hg bisect -s      # -> update to rev 12
  Testing changeset 12:9f259202bbe7 (8 changesets remaining, ~3 tests)
  3 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(pruned)'
  0:33b1f9bc8bc5
  1:4ca5088da217
  2:051e12f87bf1
  3:0950834f0a9c
  4:5c668c22234f
  5:385a529b6670
  6:a214d5d3811a
  10:429fcd26f52d
  13:b0a32c86eb31
  16:609d82a7ebae
  17:228c06deef46
  $ hg bisect -g      # -> update to rev 9
  Testing changeset 9:3c77083deb4a (5 changesets remaining, ~2 tests)
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ hg bisect -s      # -> update to rev 15
  Testing changeset 15:857b178a7cf3 (5 changesets remaining, ~2 tests)
  3 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(ignored)'
  $ hg bisect -b
  Due to skipped revisions, the first bad revision could be any of:
  changeset:   9:3c77083deb4a
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:09 1970 +0000
  summary:     9
  
  changeset:   10:429fcd26f52d
  parent:      9:3c77083deb4a
  parent:      6:a214d5d3811a
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:10 1970 +0000
  summary:     merge 6,9
  
  changeset:   13:b0a32c86eb31
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:13 1970 +0000
  summary:     13
  
  changeset:   15:857b178a7cf3
  parent:      13:b0a32c86eb31
  parent:      10:429fcd26f52d
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:15 1970 +0000
  summary:     merge 10,13
  
  $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(range)'
  1:4ca5088da217
  2:051e12f87bf1
  3:0950834f0a9c
  4:5c668c22234f
  5:385a529b6670
  6:a214d5d3811a
  8:dab8161ac8fc
  9:3c77083deb4a
  10:429fcd26f52d
  11:82ca6f06eccd
  12:9f259202bbe7
  13:b0a32c86eb31
  15:857b178a7cf3
  16:609d82a7ebae
  $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(ignored)'

complex bisect test 4

first good revision is 17
15,16 are skipped an might be the first good revisions as well

  $ hg bisect -r
  $ hg bisect -g 17
  $ hg bisect -b 8    # -> update to rev 10
  Testing changeset 13:b0a32c86eb31 (8 changesets remaining, ~3 tests)
  2 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ hg bisect -b      # -> update to rev 13
  Testing changeset 10:429fcd26f52d (5 changesets remaining, ~2 tests)
  3 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ hg bisect -b      # -> update to rev 15
  Testing changeset 15:857b178a7cf3 (3 changesets remaining, ~1 tests)
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(pruned)'
  0:33b1f9bc8bc5
  1:4ca5088da217
  2:051e12f87bf1
  3:0950834f0a9c
  4:5c668c22234f
  5:385a529b6670
  6:a214d5d3811a
  8:dab8161ac8fc
  9:3c77083deb4a
  10:429fcd26f52d
  11:82ca6f06eccd
  12:9f259202bbe7
  13:b0a32c86eb31
  17:228c06deef46
  $ hg bisect -s      # -> update to rev 16
  Testing changeset 16:609d82a7ebae (3 changesets remaining, ~1 tests)
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(pruned)'
  0:33b1f9bc8bc5
  1:4ca5088da217
  2:051e12f87bf1
  3:0950834f0a9c
  4:5c668c22234f
  5:385a529b6670
  6:a214d5d3811a
  8:dab8161ac8fc
  9:3c77083deb4a
  10:429fcd26f52d
  11:82ca6f06eccd
  12:9f259202bbe7
  13:b0a32c86eb31
  15:857b178a7cf3
  17:228c06deef46
  $ hg bisect -s
  Due to skipped revisions, the first good revision could be any of:
  changeset:   15:857b178a7cf3
  parent:      13:b0a32c86eb31
  parent:      10:429fcd26f52d
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:15 1970 +0000
  summary:     merge 10,13
  
  changeset:   16:609d82a7ebae
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:16 1970 +0000
  summary:     16
  
  changeset:   17:228c06deef46
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:17 1970 +0000
  summary:     17
  
  $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(range)'
  8:dab8161ac8fc
  9:3c77083deb4a
  10:429fcd26f52d
  11:82ca6f06eccd
  12:9f259202bbe7
  13:b0a32c86eb31
  15:857b178a7cf3
  16:609d82a7ebae
  17:228c06deef46
  $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(pruned)'
  0:33b1f9bc8bc5
  1:4ca5088da217
  2:051e12f87bf1
  3:0950834f0a9c
  4:5c668c22234f
  5:385a529b6670
  6:a214d5d3811a
  8:dab8161ac8fc
  9:3c77083deb4a
  10:429fcd26f52d
  11:82ca6f06eccd
  12:9f259202bbe7
  13:b0a32c86eb31
  15:857b178a7cf3
  16:609d82a7ebae
  17:228c06deef46

test unrelated revs:

  $ hg bisect --reset
  $ hg bisect -b 7
  $ hg bisect -g 14
  abort: starting revisions are not directly related
  [255]
  $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(range)'
  $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(pruned)'
  0:33b1f9bc8bc5
  1:4ca5088da217
  2:051e12f87bf1
  3:0950834f0a9c
  4:5c668c22234f
  7:50c76098bbf2
  14:faa450606157
  $ hg bisect --reset

end at merge: 17 bad, 11 good (but 9 is first bad)

  $ hg bisect -r
  $ hg bisect -b 17
  $ hg bisect -g 11
  Testing changeset 13:b0a32c86eb31 (5 changesets remaining, ~2 tests)
  3 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(ignored)'
  2:051e12f87bf1
  3:0950834f0a9c
  4:5c668c22234f
  5:385a529b6670
  6:a214d5d3811a
  9:3c77083deb4a
  10:429fcd26f52d
  $ hg bisect -g
  Testing changeset 15:857b178a7cf3 (3 changesets remaining, ~1 tests)
  3 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ hg bisect -b
  The first bad revision is:
  changeset:   15:857b178a7cf3
  parent:      13:b0a32c86eb31
  parent:      10:429fcd26f52d
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:15 1970 +0000
  summary:     merge 10,13
  
  Not all ancestors of this changeset have been checked.
  Use bisect --extend to continue the bisection from
  the common ancestor, dab8161ac8fc.
  $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(range)'
  11:82ca6f06eccd
  12:9f259202bbe7
  13:b0a32c86eb31
  15:857b178a7cf3
  16:609d82a7ebae
  17:228c06deef46
  $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(pruned)'
  0:33b1f9bc8bc5
  1:4ca5088da217
  8:dab8161ac8fc
  11:82ca6f06eccd
  12:9f259202bbe7
  13:b0a32c86eb31
  15:857b178a7cf3
  16:609d82a7ebae
  17:228c06deef46
  18:d42e18c7bc9b
  $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(untested)'
  $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(ignored)'
  2:051e12f87bf1
  3:0950834f0a9c
  4:5c668c22234f
  5:385a529b6670
  6:a214d5d3811a
  9:3c77083deb4a
  10:429fcd26f52d
  $ hg bisect --extend
  Extending search to changeset 8:dab8161ac8fc
  2 files updated, 0 files merged, 2 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(untested)'
  $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(ignored)'
  2:051e12f87bf1
  3:0950834f0a9c
  4:5c668c22234f
  5:385a529b6670
  6:a214d5d3811a
  9:3c77083deb4a
  10:429fcd26f52d
  $ hg bisect -g # dab8161ac8fc
  Testing changeset 9:3c77083deb4a (3 changesets remaining, ~1 tests)
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(untested)'
  9:3c77083deb4a
  10:429fcd26f52d
  $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(ignored)'
  2:051e12f87bf1
  3:0950834f0a9c
  4:5c668c22234f
  5:385a529b6670
  6:a214d5d3811a
  $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(goods)'
  0:33b1f9bc8bc5
  1:4ca5088da217
  8:dab8161ac8fc
  11:82ca6f06eccd
  12:9f259202bbe7
  13:b0a32c86eb31
  $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(bads)'
  15:857b178a7cf3
  16:609d82a7ebae
  17:228c06deef46
  18:d42e18c7bc9b
  $ hg bisect -b
  The first bad revision is:
  changeset:   9:3c77083deb4a
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:09 1970 +0000
  summary:     9
  
  $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(range)'
  8:dab8161ac8fc
  9:3c77083deb4a
  10:429fcd26f52d
  11:82ca6f06eccd
  12:9f259202bbe7
  13:b0a32c86eb31
  15:857b178a7cf3
  16:609d82a7ebae
  17:228c06deef46
  $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(pruned)'
  0:33b1f9bc8bc5
  1:4ca5088da217
  8:dab8161ac8fc
  9:3c77083deb4a
  10:429fcd26f52d
  11:82ca6f06eccd
  12:9f259202bbe7
  13:b0a32c86eb31
  15:857b178a7cf3
  16:609d82a7ebae
  17:228c06deef46
  18:d42e18c7bc9b
  $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(untested)'
  $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(ignored)'
  2:051e12f87bf1
  3:0950834f0a9c
  4:5c668c22234f
  5:385a529b6670
  6:a214d5d3811a
  $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(goods)'
  0:33b1f9bc8bc5
  1:4ca5088da217
  8:dab8161ac8fc
  11:82ca6f06eccd
  12:9f259202bbe7
  13:b0a32c86eb31
  $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(bads)'
  9:3c77083deb4a
  10:429fcd26f52d
  15:857b178a7cf3
  16:609d82a7ebae
  17:228c06deef46
  18:d42e18c7bc9b

user adds irrelevant but consistent information (here: -g 2) to bisect state

  $ hg bisect -r
  $ hg bisect -b 13
  $ hg bisect -g 8
  Testing changeset 11:82ca6f06eccd (3 changesets remaining, ~1 tests)
  2 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(untested)'
  11:82ca6f06eccd
  12:9f259202bbe7
  $ hg bisect -g 2
  Testing changeset 11:82ca6f06eccd (3 changesets remaining, ~1 tests)
  0 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(untested)'
  11:82ca6f06eccd
  12:9f259202bbe7
  $ hg bisect -b
  The first bad revision is:
  changeset:   11:82ca6f06eccd
  parent:      8:dab8161ac8fc
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:11 1970 +0000
  summary:     11
  
  $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(range)'
  8:dab8161ac8fc
  11:82ca6f06eccd
  12:9f259202bbe7
  13:b0a32c86eb31
  $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(pruned)'
  0:33b1f9bc8bc5
  1:4ca5088da217
  2:051e12f87bf1
  8:dab8161ac8fc
  11:82ca6f06eccd
  12:9f259202bbe7
  13:b0a32c86eb31
  14:faa450606157
  15:857b178a7cf3
  16:609d82a7ebae
  17:228c06deef46
  18:d42e18c7bc9b
  $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(untested)'