view tests/test-commit-unresolved.t @ 37631:2f626233859b

wireproto: implement batching on peer executor interface

This is a bit more complicated than non-batch requests because we
need to buffer sends until the last request arrives *and* we need
to support resolving futures as data arrives from the remote.

In a classical concurrent.futures executor model, the future
"starts" as soon as it is submitted. However, we have nothing to
start until the last command is submitted.

If we did nothing, calling result() would deadlock, since the future
hasn't "started." So in the case where we queue the command, we return
a special future type whose result() will trigger sendcommands().
This eliminates the deadlock potential. It also serves as a check
against callers who may be calling result() prematurely, as it will
prevent any subsequent callcommands() from working. This behavior
is slightly annoying and a bit restrictive. But it's the world
that half duplex connections forces on us.

In order to support streaming responses, we were previously using
a generator. But with a futures-based API, we're using futures
and not generators. So in order to get streaming, we need a
background thread to read data from the server.

The approach taken in this patch is to leverage the ThreadPoolExecutor
from concurrent.futures for managing a background thread. We create
an executor and future that resolves when all response data is
processed (or an error occurs). When exiting the context manager,
we wait on that background reading before returning.

I was hoping we could manually spin up a threading.Thread and this
would be simple. But I ran into a few deadlocks when implementing.
After looking at the source code to concurrent.futures, I figured
it would just be easier to use a ThreadPoolExecutor than implement
all the code needed to manually manage a thread.

To prove this works, a use of the batch API in discovery has been
updated.

Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D3269

  $ addcommit () {
  >     echo $1 > $1
  >     hg add $1
  >     hg commit -d "${2} 0" -m $1
  > }

  $ commit () {
  >     hg commit -d "${2} 0" -m $1
  > }

  $ hg init a
  $ cd a
  $ addcommit "A" 0
  $ addcommit "B" 1
  $ echo "C" >> A
  $ commit "C" 2

  $ hg update -C 0
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ echo "D" >> A
  $ commit "D" 3
  created new head

State before the merge

  $ hg status
  $ hg id
  e45016d2b3d3 tip
  $ hg summary
  parent: 3:e45016d2b3d3 tip
   D
  branch: default
  commit: (clean)
  update: 2 new changesets, 2 branch heads (merge)
  phases: 4 draft

Testing the abort functionality first in case of conflicts

  $ hg merge --abort
  abort: no merge in progress
  [255]
  $ hg merge
  merging A
  warning: conflicts while merging A! (edit, then use 'hg resolve --mark')
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 1 files unresolved
  use 'hg resolve' to retry unresolved file merges or 'hg merge --abort' to abandon
  [1]

  $ hg merge --abort e4501
  abort: cannot specify a node with --abort
  [255]
  $ hg merge --abort --rev e4501
  abort: cannot specify both --rev and --abort
  [255]

  $ hg merge --abort
  aborting the merge, updating back to e45016d2b3d3
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved

Checking that we got back in the same state

  $ hg status
  ? A.orig
  $ hg id
  e45016d2b3d3 tip
  $ hg summary
  parent: 3:e45016d2b3d3 tip
   D
  branch: default
  commit: 1 unknown (clean)
  update: 2 new changesets, 2 branch heads (merge)
  phases: 4 draft

Merging a conflict araises

  $ hg merge
  merging A
  warning: conflicts while merging A! (edit, then use 'hg resolve --mark')
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 1 files unresolved
  use 'hg resolve' to retry unresolved file merges or 'hg merge --abort' to abandon
  [1]

Correct the conflict without marking the file as resolved

  $ echo "ABCD" > A
  $ hg commit -m "Merged"
  abort: unresolved merge conflicts (see 'hg help resolve')
  [255]

Mark the conflict as resolved and commit

  $ hg resolve -m A
  (no more unresolved files)
  $ hg commit -m "Merged"

Test that if a file is removed but not marked resolved, the commit still fails
(issue4972)

  $ hg up ".^"
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ hg merge 2
  merging A
  warning: conflicts while merging A! (edit, then use 'hg resolve --mark')
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 1 files unresolved
  use 'hg resolve' to retry unresolved file merges or 'hg merge --abort' to abandon
  [1]
  $ hg rm --force A
  $ hg commit -m merged
  abort: unresolved merge conflicts (see 'hg help resolve')
  [255]

  $ hg resolve -ma
  (no more unresolved files)
  $ hg commit -m merged
  created new head

Testing the abort functionality in case of no conflicts

  $ hg update -C 0
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ addcommit "E" 4
  created new head
  $ hg id
  68352a18a7c4 tip

  $ hg merge -r 4
  2 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (branch merge, don't forget to commit)

  $ hg merge --preview --abort
  abort: cannot specify --preview with --abort
  [255]

  $ hg merge --abort
  aborting the merge, updating back to 68352a18a7c4
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved

  $ hg id
  68352a18a7c4 tip

  $ cd ..