view tests/test-filebranch.t @ 37631:2f626233859b

wireproto: implement batching on peer executor interface This is a bit more complicated than non-batch requests because we need to buffer sends until the last request arrives *and* we need to support resolving futures as data arrives from the remote. In a classical concurrent.futures executor model, the future "starts" as soon as it is submitted. However, we have nothing to start until the last command is submitted. If we did nothing, calling result() would deadlock, since the future hasn't "started." So in the case where we queue the command, we return a special future type whose result() will trigger sendcommands(). This eliminates the deadlock potential. It also serves as a check against callers who may be calling result() prematurely, as it will prevent any subsequent callcommands() from working. This behavior is slightly annoying and a bit restrictive. But it's the world that half duplex connections forces on us. In order to support streaming responses, we were previously using a generator. But with a futures-based API, we're using futures and not generators. So in order to get streaming, we need a background thread to read data from the server. The approach taken in this patch is to leverage the ThreadPoolExecutor from concurrent.futures for managing a background thread. We create an executor and future that resolves when all response data is processed (or an error occurs). When exiting the context manager, we wait on that background reading before returning. I was hoping we could manually spin up a threading.Thread and this would be simple. But I ran into a few deadlocks when implementing. After looking at the source code to concurrent.futures, I figured it would just be easier to use a ThreadPoolExecutor than implement all the code needed to manually manage a thread. To prove this works, a use of the batch API in discovery has been updated. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D3269
author Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com>
date Fri, 13 Apr 2018 11:02:34 -0700
parents d4e62df1c73d
children f1186c292d03
line wrap: on
line source

This test makes sure that we don't mark a file as merged with its ancestor
when we do a merge.

  $ cat <<EOF > merge
  > from __future__ import print_function
  > import sys, os
  > print("merging for", os.path.basename(sys.argv[1]))
  > EOF
  $ HGMERGE="$PYTHON ../merge"; export HGMERGE

Creating base:

  $ hg init a
  $ cd a
  $ echo 1 > foo
  $ echo 1 > bar
  $ echo 1 > baz
  $ echo 1 > quux
  $ hg add foo bar baz quux
  $ hg commit -m "base"

  $ cd ..
  $ hg clone a b
  updating to branch default
  4 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved

Creating branch a:

  $ cd a
  $ echo 2a > foo
  $ echo 2a > bar
  $ hg commit -m "branch a"

Creating branch b:

  $ cd ..
  $ cd b
  $ echo 2b > foo
  $ echo 2b > baz
  $ hg commit -m "branch b"

We shouldn't have anything but n state here:

  $ hg debugstate --nodates | grep -v "^n"
  [1]

Merging:

  $ hg pull ../a
  pulling from ../a
  searching for changes
  adding changesets
  adding manifests
  adding file changes
  added 1 changesets with 2 changes to 2 files (+1 heads)
  new changesets bdd988058d16
  (run 'hg heads' to see heads, 'hg merge' to merge)

  $ hg merge -v
  resolving manifests
  getting bar
  merging foo
  merging for foo
  1 files updated, 1 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (branch merge, don't forget to commit)

  $ echo 2m > foo
  $ echo 2b > baz
  $ echo new > quux

  $ hg ci -m "merge"

main: we should have a merge here:

  $ hg debugindex --changelog
     rev linkrev nodeid       p1           p2
       0       0 cdca01651b96 000000000000 000000000000
       1       1 f6718a9cb7f3 cdca01651b96 000000000000
       2       2 bdd988058d16 cdca01651b96 000000000000
       3       3 d8a521142a3c f6718a9cb7f3 bdd988058d16

log should show foo and quux changed:

  $ hg log -v -r tip
  changeset:   3:d8a521142a3c
  tag:         tip
  parent:      1:f6718a9cb7f3
  parent:      2:bdd988058d16
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
  files:       foo quux
  description:
  merge
  
  

foo: we should have a merge here:

  $ hg debugindex foo
     rev linkrev nodeid       p1           p2
       0       0 b8e02f643373 000000000000 000000000000
       1       1 2ffeddde1b65 b8e02f643373 000000000000
       2       2 33d1fb69067a b8e02f643373 000000000000
       3       3 aa27919ee430 2ffeddde1b65 33d1fb69067a

bar: we should not have a merge here:

  $ hg debugindex bar
     rev linkrev nodeid       p1           p2
       0       0 b8e02f643373 000000000000 000000000000
       1       2 33d1fb69067a b8e02f643373 000000000000

baz: we should not have a merge here:

  $ hg debugindex baz
     rev linkrev nodeid       p1           p2
       0       0 b8e02f643373 000000000000 000000000000
       1       1 2ffeddde1b65 b8e02f643373 000000000000

quux: we should not have a merge here:

  $ hg debugindex quux
     rev linkrev nodeid       p1           p2
       0       0 b8e02f643373 000000000000 000000000000
       1       3 6128c0f33108 b8e02f643373 000000000000

Manifest entries should match tips of all files:

  $ hg manifest --debug
  33d1fb69067a0139622a3fa3b7ba1cdb1367972e 644   bar
  2ffeddde1b65b4827f6746174a145474129fa2ce 644   baz
  aa27919ee4303cfd575e1fb932dd64d75aa08be4 644   foo
  6128c0f33108e8cfbb4e0824d13ae48b466d7280 644   quux

Everything should be clean now:

  $ hg status

  $ hg verify
  checking changesets
  checking manifests
  crosschecking files in changesets and manifests
  checking files
  4 files, 4 changesets, 10 total revisions

  $ cd ..