view tests/test-largefiles-small-disk.t @ 37631:2f626233859b

wireproto: implement batching on peer executor interface

This is a bit more complicated than non-batch requests because we
need to buffer sends until the last request arrives *and* we need
to support resolving futures as data arrives from the remote.

In a classical concurrent.futures executor model, the future
"starts" as soon as it is submitted. However, we have nothing to
start until the last command is submitted.

If we did nothing, calling result() would deadlock, since the future
hasn't "started." So in the case where we queue the command, we return
a special future type whose result() will trigger sendcommands().
This eliminates the deadlock potential. It also serves as a check
against callers who may be calling result() prematurely, as it will
prevent any subsequent callcommands() from working. This behavior
is slightly annoying and a bit restrictive. But it's the world
that half duplex connections forces on us.

In order to support streaming responses, we were previously using
a generator. But with a futures-based API, we're using futures
and not generators. So in order to get streaming, we need a
background thread to read data from the server.

The approach taken in this patch is to leverage the ThreadPoolExecutor
from concurrent.futures for managing a background thread. We create
an executor and future that resolves when all response data is
processed (or an error occurs). When exiting the context manager,
we wait on that background reading before returning.

I was hoping we could manually spin up a threading.Thread and this
would be simple. But I ran into a few deadlocks when implementing.
After looking at the source code to concurrent.futures, I figured
it would just be easier to use a ThreadPoolExecutor than implement
all the code needed to manually manage a thread.

To prove this works, a use of the batch API in discovery has been
updated.

Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D3269

Test how largefiles abort in case the disk runs full

  $ cat > criple.py <<EOF
  > from __future__ import absolute_import
  > import errno
  > import os
  > import shutil
  > from mercurial import util
  > #
  > # this makes the original largefiles code abort:
  > _origcopyfileobj = shutil.copyfileobj
  > def copyfileobj(fsrc, fdst, length=16*1024):
  >     # allow journal files (used by transaction) to be written
  >     if b'journal.' in fdst.name:
  >         return _origcopyfileobj(fsrc, fdst, length)
  >     fdst.write(fsrc.read(4))
  >     raise IOError(errno.ENOSPC, os.strerror(errno.ENOSPC))
  > shutil.copyfileobj = copyfileobj
  > #
  > # this makes the rewritten code abort:
  > def filechunkiter(f, size=131072, limit=None):
  >     yield f.read(4)
  >     raise IOError(errno.ENOSPC, os.strerror(errno.ENOSPC))
  > util.filechunkiter = filechunkiter
  > #
  > def oslink(src, dest):
  >     raise OSError("no hardlinks, try copying instead")
  > util.oslink = oslink
  > EOF

  $ echo "[extensions]" >> $HGRCPATH
  $ echo "largefiles =" >> $HGRCPATH

  $ hg init alice
  $ cd alice
  $ echo "this is a very big file" > big
  $ hg add --large big
  $ hg commit --config extensions.criple=$TESTTMP/criple.py -m big
  abort: No space left on device
  [255]

The largefile is not created in .hg/largefiles:

  $ ls .hg/largefiles
  dirstate

The user cache is not even created:

  >>> import os; os.path.exists("$HOME/.cache/largefiles/")
  False

Make the commit with space on the device:

  $ hg commit -m big

Now make a clone with a full disk, and make sure lfutil.link function
makes copies instead of hardlinks:

  $ cd ..
  $ hg --config extensions.criple=$TESTTMP/criple.py clone --pull alice bob
  requesting all changes
  adding changesets
  adding manifests
  adding file changes
  added 1 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files
  new changesets 390cf214e9ac
  updating to branch default
  getting changed largefiles
  abort: No space left on device
  [255]

The largefile is not created in .hg/largefiles:

  $ ls bob/.hg/largefiles
  dirstate