view tests/test-merge-revert2.t @ 37631:2f626233859b

wireproto: implement batching on peer executor interface

This is a bit more complicated than non-batch requests because we
need to buffer sends until the last request arrives *and* we need
to support resolving futures as data arrives from the remote.

In a classical concurrent.futures executor model, the future
"starts" as soon as it is submitted. However, we have nothing to
start until the last command is submitted.

If we did nothing, calling result() would deadlock, since the future
hasn't "started." So in the case where we queue the command, we return
a special future type whose result() will trigger sendcommands().
This eliminates the deadlock potential. It also serves as a check
against callers who may be calling result() prematurely, as it will
prevent any subsequent callcommands() from working. This behavior
is slightly annoying and a bit restrictive. But it's the world
that half duplex connections forces on us.

In order to support streaming responses, we were previously using
a generator. But with a futures-based API, we're using futures
and not generators. So in order to get streaming, we need a
background thread to read data from the server.

The approach taken in this patch is to leverage the ThreadPoolExecutor
from concurrent.futures for managing a background thread. We create
an executor and future that resolves when all response data is
processed (or an error occurs). When exiting the context manager,
we wait on that background reading before returning.

I was hoping we could manually spin up a threading.Thread and this
would be simple. But I ran into a few deadlocks when implementing.
After looking at the source code to concurrent.futures, I figured
it would just be easier to use a ThreadPoolExecutor than implement
all the code needed to manually manage a thread.

To prove this works, a use of the batch API in discovery has been
updated.

Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D3269

  $ hg init

  $ echo "added file1" > file1
  $ echo "another line of text" >> file1
  $ echo "added file2" > file2
  $ hg add file1 file2
  $ hg commit -m "added file1 and file2"

  $ echo "changed file1" >> file1
  $ hg commit -m "changed file1"

  $ hg -q log
  1:dfab7f3c2efb
  0:c3fa057dd86f
  $ hg id
  dfab7f3c2efb tip

  $ hg update -C 0
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ hg id
  c3fa057dd86f

  $ echo "changed file1" >> file1
  $ hg id
  c3fa057dd86f+

  $ hg revert --no-backup --all
  reverting file1
  $ hg diff
  $ hg status
  $ hg id
  c3fa057dd86f

  $ hg update
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ hg diff
  $ hg status
  $ hg id
  dfab7f3c2efb tip

  $ hg update -C 0
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ echo "changed file1 different" >> file1

  $ hg update
  merging file1
  warning: conflicts while merging file1! (edit, then use 'hg resolve --mark')
  0 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 1 files unresolved
  use 'hg resolve' to retry unresolved file merges
  [1]

  $ hg diff --nodates
  diff -r dfab7f3c2efb file1
  --- a/file1
  +++ b/file1
  @@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
   added file1
   another line of text
  +<<<<<<< working copy: c3fa057dd86f - test: added file1 and file2
  +changed file1 different
  +=======
   changed file1
  +>>>>>>> destination:  dfab7f3c2efb - test: changed file1

  $ hg status
  M file1
  ? file1.orig
  $ hg id
  dfab7f3c2efb+ tip

  $ hg revert --no-backup --all
  reverting file1
  $ hg diff
  $ hg status
  ? file1.orig
  $ hg id
  dfab7f3c2efb tip

  $ hg revert -r tip --no-backup --all
  $ hg diff
  $ hg status
  ? file1.orig
  $ hg id
  dfab7f3c2efb tip

  $ hg update -C
  0 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ hg diff
  $ hg status
  ? file1.orig
  $ hg id
  dfab7f3c2efb tip