view tests/test-merge10.t @ 37631:2f626233859b

wireproto: implement batching on peer executor interface

This is a bit more complicated than non-batch requests because we
need to buffer sends until the last request arrives *and* we need
to support resolving futures as data arrives from the remote.

In a classical concurrent.futures executor model, the future
"starts" as soon as it is submitted. However, we have nothing to
start until the last command is submitted.

If we did nothing, calling result() would deadlock, since the future
hasn't "started." So in the case where we queue the command, we return
a special future type whose result() will trigger sendcommands().
This eliminates the deadlock potential. It also serves as a check
against callers who may be calling result() prematurely, as it will
prevent any subsequent callcommands() from working. This behavior
is slightly annoying and a bit restrictive. But it's the world
that half duplex connections forces on us.

In order to support streaming responses, we were previously using
a generator. But with a futures-based API, we're using futures
and not generators. So in order to get streaming, we need a
background thread to read data from the server.

The approach taken in this patch is to leverage the ThreadPoolExecutor
from concurrent.futures for managing a background thread. We create
an executor and future that resolves when all response data is
processed (or an error occurs). When exiting the context manager,
we wait on that background reading before returning.

I was hoping we could manually spin up a threading.Thread and this
would be simple. But I ran into a few deadlocks when implementing.
After looking at the source code to concurrent.futures, I figured
it would just be easier to use a ThreadPoolExecutor than implement
all the code needed to manually manage a thread.

To prove this works, a use of the batch API in discovery has been
updated.

Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D3269

Test for changeset 9fe267f77f56ff127cf7e65dc15dd9de71ce8ceb
(merge correctly when all the files in a directory are moved
but then local changes are added in the same directory)

  $ hg init a
  $ cd a
  $ mkdir -p testdir
  $ echo a > testdir/a
  $ hg add testdir/a
  $ hg commit -m a
  $ cd ..

  $ hg clone a b
  updating to branch default
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ cd a
  $ echo alpha > testdir/a
  $ hg commit -m remote-change
  $ cd ..

  $ cd b
  $ mkdir testdir/subdir
  $ hg mv testdir/a testdir/subdir/a
  $ hg commit -m move
  $ mkdir newdir
  $ echo beta > newdir/beta
  $ hg add newdir/beta
  $ hg commit -m local-addition
  $ hg pull ../a
  pulling from ../a
  searching for changes
  adding changesets
  adding manifests
  adding file changes
  added 1 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files (+1 heads)
  new changesets cc7000b01af9
  (run 'hg heads' to see heads, 'hg merge' to merge)
  $ hg up -C 2
  0 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ hg merge
  merging testdir/subdir/a and testdir/a to testdir/subdir/a
  0 files updated, 1 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (branch merge, don't forget to commit)
  $ hg stat
  M testdir/subdir/a
  $ hg diff --nodates
  diff -r bc21c9773bfa testdir/subdir/a
  --- a/testdir/subdir/a
  +++ b/testdir/subdir/a
  @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
  -a
  +alpha

  $ cd ..