view tests/test-mq-symlinks.t @ 37631:2f626233859b

wireproto: implement batching on peer executor interface This is a bit more complicated than non-batch requests because we need to buffer sends until the last request arrives *and* we need to support resolving futures as data arrives from the remote. In a classical concurrent.futures executor model, the future "starts" as soon as it is submitted. However, we have nothing to start until the last command is submitted. If we did nothing, calling result() would deadlock, since the future hasn't "started." So in the case where we queue the command, we return a special future type whose result() will trigger sendcommands(). This eliminates the deadlock potential. It also serves as a check against callers who may be calling result() prematurely, as it will prevent any subsequent callcommands() from working. This behavior is slightly annoying and a bit restrictive. But it's the world that half duplex connections forces on us. In order to support streaming responses, we were previously using a generator. But with a futures-based API, we're using futures and not generators. So in order to get streaming, we need a background thread to read data from the server. The approach taken in this patch is to leverage the ThreadPoolExecutor from concurrent.futures for managing a background thread. We create an executor and future that resolves when all response data is processed (or an error occurs). When exiting the context manager, we wait on that background reading before returning. I was hoping we could manually spin up a threading.Thread and this would be simple. But I ran into a few deadlocks when implementing. After looking at the source code to concurrent.futures, I figured it would just be easier to use a ThreadPoolExecutor than implement all the code needed to manually manage a thread. To prove this works, a use of the batch API in discovery has been updated. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D3269
author Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com>
date Fri, 13 Apr 2018 11:02:34 -0700
parents c2380b448265
children 55c6ebd11cb9
line wrap: on
line source

#require symlink

  $ echo "[extensions]" >> $HGRCPATH
  $ echo "mq=" >> $HGRCPATH

  $ hg init
  $ hg qinit
  $ hg qnew base.patch
  $ echo aaa > a
  $ echo bbb > b
  $ echo ccc > c
  $ hg add a b c
  $ hg qrefresh
  $ readlink.py a
  a -> a not a symlink


test replacing a file with a symlink

  $ hg qnew symlink.patch
  $ rm a
  $ ln -s b a
  $ hg qrefresh --git
  $ readlink.py a
  a -> b

  $ hg qpop
  popping symlink.patch
  now at: base.patch
  $ hg qpush
  applying symlink.patch
  now at: symlink.patch
  $ readlink.py a
  a -> b


test updating a symlink

  $ rm a
  $ ln -s c a
  $ hg qnew --git -f updatelink
  $ readlink.py a
  a -> c
  $ hg qpop
  popping updatelink
  now at: symlink.patch
  $ hg qpush --debug
  applying updatelink
  patching file a
  committing files:
  a
  committing manifest
  committing changelog
  updating the branch cache
  now at: updatelink
  $ readlink.py a
  a -> c
  $ hg st


test replacing a symlink with a file

  $ ln -s c s
  $ hg add s
  $ hg qnew --git -f addlink
  $ rm s
  $ echo sss > s
  $ hg qnew --git -f replacelinkwithfile
  $ hg qpop
  popping replacelinkwithfile
  now at: addlink
  $ hg qpush
  applying replacelinkwithfile
  now at: replacelinkwithfile
  $ cat s
  sss
  $ hg st


test symlink removal

  $ hg qnew removesl.patch
  $ hg rm a
  $ hg qrefresh --git
  $ hg qpop
  popping removesl.patch
  now at: replacelinkwithfile
  $ hg qpush
  applying removesl.patch
  now at: removesl.patch
  $ hg st -c
  C b
  C c
  C s

replace broken symlink with another broken symlink

  $ ln -s linka linka
  $ hg add linka
  $ hg qnew link
  $ hg mv linka linkb
  $ rm linkb
  $ ln -s linkb linkb
  $ hg qnew movelink
  $ hg qpop
  popping movelink
  now at: link
  $ hg qpush
  applying movelink
  now at: movelink
  $ readlink.py linkb
  linkb -> linkb