view tests/test-narrow-update.t @ 37631:2f626233859b

wireproto: implement batching on peer executor interface This is a bit more complicated than non-batch requests because we need to buffer sends until the last request arrives *and* we need to support resolving futures as data arrives from the remote. In a classical concurrent.futures executor model, the future "starts" as soon as it is submitted. However, we have nothing to start until the last command is submitted. If we did nothing, calling result() would deadlock, since the future hasn't "started." So in the case where we queue the command, we return a special future type whose result() will trigger sendcommands(). This eliminates the deadlock potential. It also serves as a check against callers who may be calling result() prematurely, as it will prevent any subsequent callcommands() from working. This behavior is slightly annoying and a bit restrictive. But it's the world that half duplex connections forces on us. In order to support streaming responses, we were previously using a generator. But with a futures-based API, we're using futures and not generators. So in order to get streaming, we need a background thread to read data from the server. The approach taken in this patch is to leverage the ThreadPoolExecutor from concurrent.futures for managing a background thread. We create an executor and future that resolves when all response data is processed (or an error occurs). When exiting the context manager, we wait on that background reading before returning. I was hoping we could manually spin up a threading.Thread and this would be simple. But I ran into a few deadlocks when implementing. After looking at the source code to concurrent.futures, I figured it would just be easier to use a ThreadPoolExecutor than implement all the code needed to manually manage a thread. To prove this works, a use of the batch API in discovery has been updated. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D3269
author Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com>
date Fri, 13 Apr 2018 11:02:34 -0700
parents d4e62df1c73d
children 351cbda889db
line wrap: on
line source


  $ . "$TESTDIR/narrow-library.sh"

create full repo

  $ hg init master
  $ cd master
  $ echo init > init
  $ hg ci -Aqm 'initial'

  $ mkdir inside
  $ echo inside > inside/f1
  $ mkdir outside
  $ echo outside > outside/f1
  $ hg ci -Aqm 'add inside and outside'

  $ echo modified > inside/f1
  $ hg ci -qm 'modify inside'

  $ echo modified > outside/f1
  $ hg ci -qm 'modify outside'

  $ cd ..

  $ hg clone --narrow ssh://user@dummy/master narrow --include inside
  requesting all changes
  adding changesets
  adding manifests
  adding file changes
  added 4 changesets with 2 changes to 1 files
  new changesets *:* (glob)
  updating to branch default
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ cd narrow
  $ hg debugindex -c
     rev linkrev nodeid       p1           p2
       0       0 9958b1af2add 000000000000 000000000000
       1       1 2db4ce2a3bfe 9958b1af2add 000000000000
       2       2 0980ee31a742 2db4ce2a3bfe 000000000000
       3       3 4410145019b7 0980ee31a742 000000000000

  $ hg update -q 0

Can update to revision with changes inside

  $ hg update -q 'desc("add inside and outside")'
  $ hg update -q 'desc("modify inside")'
  $ find *
  inside
  inside/f1
  $ cat inside/f1
  modified

Can update to revision with changes outside

  $ hg update -q 'desc("modify outside")'
  $ find *
  inside
  inside/f1
  $ cat inside/f1
  modified

Can update with a deleted file inside

  $ hg rm inside/f1
  $ hg update -q 'desc("modify inside")'
  $ hg update -q 'desc("modify outside")'
  $ hg update -q 'desc("initial")'
  $ hg update -q 'desc("modify inside")'

Can update with a moved file inside

  $ hg mv inside/f1 inside/f2
  $ hg update -q 'desc("modify outside")'
  $ hg update -q 'desc("initial")'
  $ hg update -q 'desc("modify inside")'