Mercurial > hg
view tests/test-unified-test.t @ 37631:2f626233859b
wireproto: implement batching on peer executor interface
This is a bit more complicated than non-batch requests because we
need to buffer sends until the last request arrives *and* we need
to support resolving futures as data arrives from the remote.
In a classical concurrent.futures executor model, the future
"starts" as soon as it is submitted. However, we have nothing to
start until the last command is submitted.
If we did nothing, calling result() would deadlock, since the future
hasn't "started." So in the case where we queue the command, we return
a special future type whose result() will trigger sendcommands().
This eliminates the deadlock potential. It also serves as a check
against callers who may be calling result() prematurely, as it will
prevent any subsequent callcommands() from working. This behavior
is slightly annoying and a bit restrictive. But it's the world
that half duplex connections forces on us.
In order to support streaming responses, we were previously using
a generator. But with a futures-based API, we're using futures
and not generators. So in order to get streaming, we need a
background thread to read data from the server.
The approach taken in this patch is to leverage the ThreadPoolExecutor
from concurrent.futures for managing a background thread. We create
an executor and future that resolves when all response data is
processed (or an error occurs). When exiting the context manager,
we wait on that background reading before returning.
I was hoping we could manually spin up a threading.Thread and this
would be simple. But I ran into a few deadlocks when implementing.
After looking at the source code to concurrent.futures, I figured
it would just be easier to use a ThreadPoolExecutor than implement
all the code needed to manually manage a thread.
To prove this works, a use of the batch API in discovery has been
updated.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D3269
author | Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> |
---|---|
date | Fri, 13 Apr 2018 11:02:34 -0700 |
parents | 4441705b7111 |
children | e504fa630860 |
line wrap: on
line source
Test that the syntax of "unified tests" is properly processed ============================================================== Simple commands: $ echo foo foo $ printf 'oh no' oh no (no-eol) $ printf 'bar\nbaz\n' | cat bar baz Multi-line command: $ foo() { > echo bar > } $ foo bar Return codes before inline python: $ sh -c 'exit 1' [1] Doctest commands: >>> from __future__ import print_function >>> print('foo') foo $ echo interleaved interleaved >>> for c in 'xyz': ... print(c) x y z >>> print() >>> foo = 'global name' >>> def func(): ... print(foo, 'should be visible in func()') >>> func() global name should be visible in func() >>> print('''multiline ... string''') multiline string Regular expressions: $ echo foobarbaz foobar.* (re) $ echo barbazquux .*quux.* (re) Globs: $ printf '* \\foobarbaz {10}\n' \* \\fo?bar* {10} (glob) Literal match ending in " (re)": $ echo 'foo (re)' foo (re) Windows: \r\n is handled like \n and can be escaped: #if windows $ printf 'crlf\r\ncr\r\tcrlf\r\ncrlf\r\n' crlf cr\r (no-eol) (esc) \tcrlf (esc) crlf\r (esc) #endif Combining esc with other markups - and handling lines ending with \r instead of \n: $ printf 'foo/bar\r' fo?/bar\r (no-eol) (glob) (esc) #if windows $ printf 'foo\\bar\r' foo/bar\r (no-eol) (esc) #endif $ printf 'foo/bar\rfoo/bar\r' foo.bar\r \(no-eol\) (re) (esc) foo.bar\r \(no-eol\) (re) testing hghave $ hghave true $ hghave false skipped: missing feature: nail clipper [1] $ hghave no-true skipped: system supports yak shaving [1] $ hghave no-false Conditional sections based on hghave: #if true $ echo tested tested #else $ echo skipped #endif #if false $ echo skipped #else $ echo tested tested #endif #if no-false $ echo tested tested #else $ echo skipped #endif #if no-true $ echo skipped #else $ echo tested tested #endif Exit code: $ (exit 1) [1]