view mercurial/py3kcompat.py @ 15708:309e49491253

push: propagate --new-branch and --ssh options when pushing subrepos

Up until now the all the push command options were ignored when pushing
subrepos. In particular, the fact that the --new-branch command was not passed
down to subrepos made it not possible to push a repo when any of its
subrepos had a new branch, even if you used the --new-branch option of the push
command.

In addition the error message was confusing since it showed the following hint:
"--new-branch hint: use 'hg push --new-branch' to create new remote branches".
However using the --new_branch flag did not fix the problem, as it was ignored
when pushing subrepos.

This patch passes the --new-branch and --ssh flags to every subrepo that is
pushed.

Issues/Limitations:

- All subrepo types get these flags, but only the mercurial subrepos use them.
- It is no longer possible to _not_ pass down these flags to subrepos when
pushing:
   * An alternative would be to introduce a --subrepos flag that should be
used to pass down these flags to the subrepos.
   * If we did this, it could make sense to make the --force flag respect this
   new --subrepos flag as well for consistency's sake.
- Matt suggested that the ssh related flags could also be passed down to
subrepos during pull and clone. However it seems that it would be the "update"
command that would need to get those, since subrepos are only pulled on update.
In any case I'd prefer to leave that for a later patch.

# py3kcompat.py - compatibility definitions for running hg in py3k
#
# Copyright 2010 Renato Cunha <[e-mail]>
#
# This software may be used and distributed according to the terms of the
# GNU General Public License version 2 or any later version.

import os, builtins

from numbers import Number

def bytesformatter(format, args):
    '''Custom implementation of a formatter for bytestrings.

    This function currently relias on the string formatter to do the
    formatting and always returns bytes objects.

    >>> bytesformatter(20, 10)
    0
    >>> bytesformatter('unicode %s, %s!', ('string', 'foo'))
    b'unicode string, foo!'
    >>> bytesformatter(b'test %s', 'me')
    b'test me'
    >>> bytesformatter('test %s', 'me')
    b'test me'
    >>> bytesformatter(b'test %s', b'me')
    b'test me'
    >>> bytesformatter('test %s', b'me')
    b'test me'
    >>> bytesformatter('test %d: %s', (1, b'result'))
    b'test 1: result'
    '''
    # The current implementation just converts from bytes to unicode, do
    # what's needed and then convert the results back to bytes.
    # Another alternative is to use the Python C API implementation.
    if isinstance(format, Number):
        # If the fixer erroneously passes a number remainder operation to
        # bytesformatter, we just return the correct operation
        return format % args
    if isinstance(format, bytes):
        format = format.decode('utf-8', 'surrogateescape')
    if isinstance(args, bytes):
        args = args.decode('utf-8', 'surrogateescape')
    if isinstance(args, tuple):
        newargs = []
        for arg in args:
            if isinstance(arg, bytes):
                arg = arg.decode('utf-8', 'surrogateescape')
            newargs.append(arg)
        args = tuple(newargs)
    ret = format % args
    return ret.encode('utf-8', 'surrogateescape')
builtins.bytesformatter = bytesformatter

# Create bytes equivalents for os.environ values
for key in list(os.environ.keys()):
    # UTF-8 is fine for us
    bkey = key.encode('utf-8', 'surrogateescape')
    bvalue = os.environ[key].encode('utf-8', 'surrogateescape')
    os.environ[bkey] = bvalue

origord = builtins.ord
def fakeord(char):
    if isinstance(char, int):
        return char
    return origord(char)
builtins.ord = fakeord

if __name__ == '__main__':
    import doctest
    doctest.testmod()