view tests/test-bundle-vs-outgoing.t @ 15708:309e49491253

push: propagate --new-branch and --ssh options when pushing subrepos

Up until now the all the push command options were ignored when pushing
subrepos. In particular, the fact that the --new-branch command was not passed
down to subrepos made it not possible to push a repo when any of its
subrepos had a new branch, even if you used the --new-branch option of the push
command.

In addition the error message was confusing since it showed the following hint:
"--new-branch hint: use 'hg push --new-branch' to create new remote branches".
However using the --new_branch flag did not fix the problem, as it was ignored
when pushing subrepos.

This patch passes the --new-branch and --ssh flags to every subrepo that is
pushed.

Issues/Limitations:

- All subrepo types get these flags, but only the mercurial subrepos use them.
- It is no longer possible to _not_ pass down these flags to subrepos when
pushing:
   * An alternative would be to introduce a --subrepos flag that should be
used to pass down these flags to the subrepos.
   * If we did this, it could make sense to make the --force flag respect this
   new --subrepos flag as well for consistency's sake.
- Matt suggested that the ssh related flags could also be passed down to
subrepos during pull and clone. However it seems that it would be the "update"
command that would need to get those, since subrepos are only pulled on update.
In any case I'd prefer to leave that for a later patch.

this structure seems to tickle a bug in bundle's search for
changesets, so first we have to recreate it

o  8
|
| o  7
| |
| o  6
|/|
o |  5
| |
o |  4
| |
| o  3
| |
| o  2
|/
o  1
|
o  0

  $ mkrev()
  > {
  >     revno=$1
  >     echo "rev $revno"
  >     echo "rev $revno" > foo.txt
  >     hg -q ci -m"rev $revno"
  > }

setup test repo1

  $ hg init repo1
  $ cd repo1
  $ echo "rev 0" > foo.txt
  $ hg ci -Am"rev 0"
  adding foo.txt
  $ mkrev 1
  rev 1

first branch

  $ mkrev 2
  rev 2
  $ mkrev 3
  rev 3

back to rev 1 to create second branch

  $ hg up -r1
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ mkrev 4
  rev 4
  $ mkrev 5
  rev 5

merge first branch to second branch

  $ hg up -C -r5
  0 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ HGMERGE=internal:local hg merge
  0 files updated, 1 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (branch merge, don't forget to commit)
  $ echo "merge rev 5, rev 3" > foo.txt
  $ hg ci -m"merge first branch to second branch"

one more commit following the merge

  $ mkrev 7
  rev 7

back to "second branch" to make another head

  $ hg up -r5
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ mkrev 8
  rev 8

  $ echo "[extensions]" >> $HGRCPATH
  $ echo "graphlog=" >> $HGRCPATH

the story so far

  $ hg glog --template "{rev}\n"
  @  8
  |
  | o  7
  | |
  | o  6
  |/|
  o |  5
  | |
  o |  4
  | |
  | o  3
  | |
  | o  2
  |/
  o  1
  |
  o  0
  

check that "hg outgoing" really does the right thing

sanity check of outgoing: expect revs 4 5 6 7 8

  $ hg clone -r3 . ../repo2
  adding changesets
  adding manifests
  adding file changes
  added 4 changesets with 4 changes to 1 files
  updating to branch default
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved

this should (and does) report 5 outgoing revisions: 4 5 6 7 8

  $ hg outgoing --template "{rev}\n" ../repo2
  comparing with ../repo2
  searching for changes
  4
  5
  6
  7
  8

test bundle (destination repo): expect 5 revisions

this should bundle the same 5 revisions that outgoing reported, but it

actually bundles 7

  $ hg bundle foo.bundle ../repo2
  searching for changes
  5 changesets found

test bundle (base revision): expect 5 revisions

this should (and does) give exactly the same result as bundle

with a destination repo... i.e. it's wrong too

  $ hg bundle --base 3 foo.bundle
  5 changesets found