Mercurial > hg
view tests/test-merge-default.t @ 15708:309e49491253
push: propagate --new-branch and --ssh options when pushing subrepos
Up until now the all the push command options were ignored when pushing
subrepos. In particular, the fact that the --new-branch command was not passed
down to subrepos made it not possible to push a repo when any of its
subrepos had a new branch, even if you used the --new-branch option of the push
command.
In addition the error message was confusing since it showed the following hint:
"--new-branch hint: use 'hg push --new-branch' to create new remote branches".
However using the --new_branch flag did not fix the problem, as it was ignored
when pushing subrepos.
This patch passes the --new-branch and --ssh flags to every subrepo that is
pushed.
Issues/Limitations:
- All subrepo types get these flags, but only the mercurial subrepos use them.
- It is no longer possible to _not_ pass down these flags to subrepos when
pushing:
* An alternative would be to introduce a --subrepos flag that should be
used to pass down these flags to the subrepos.
* If we did this, it could make sense to make the --force flag respect this
new --subrepos flag as well for consistency's sake.
- Matt suggested that the ssh related flags could also be passed down to
subrepos during pull and clone. However it seems that it would be the "update"
command that would need to get those, since subrepos are only pulled on update.
In any case I'd prefer to leave that for a later patch.
author | Angel Ezquerra <angel.ezquerra@gmail.com> |
---|---|
date | Thu, 29 Sep 2011 17:20:04 +0200 |
parents | fc8c7a5ccc4a |
children | 94f77624dbb5 |
line wrap: on
line source
$ hg init $ echo a > a $ hg commit -A -ma adding a $ echo b >> a $ hg commit -mb $ echo c >> a $ hg commit -mc $ hg up 1 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ echo d >> a $ hg commit -md created new head $ hg up 1 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ echo e >> a $ hg commit -me created new head $ hg up 1 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved Should fail because not at a head: $ hg merge abort: branch 'default' has 3 heads - please merge with an explicit rev (run 'hg heads .' to see heads) [255] $ hg up 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved Should fail because > 2 heads: $ HGMERGE=internal:other; export HGMERGE $ hg merge abort: branch 'default' has 3 heads - please merge with an explicit rev (run 'hg heads .' to see heads) [255] Should succeed: $ hg merge 2 0 files updated, 1 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved (branch merge, don't forget to commit) $ hg commit -mm1 Should succeed - 2 heads: $ hg merge -P changeset: 3:ea9ff125ff88 parent: 1:1846eede8b68 user: test date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000 summary: d $ hg merge 0 files updated, 1 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved (branch merge, don't forget to commit) $ hg commit -mm2 Should fail because at tip: $ hg merge abort: nothing to merge [255] $ hg up 0 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved Should fail because there is only one head: $ hg merge abort: nothing to merge (use 'hg update' instead) [255] $ hg up 3 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ echo f >> a $ hg branch foobranch marked working directory as branch foobranch (branches are permanent and global, did you want a bookmark?) $ hg commit -mf Should fail because merge with other branch: $ hg merge abort: branch 'foobranch' has one head - please merge with an explicit rev (run 'hg heads' to see all heads) [255] Test for issue2043: ensure that 'merge -P' shows ancestors of 6 that are not ancestors of 7, regardless of where their least common ancestor is. Merge preview not affected by common ancestor: $ hg up -q 7 $ hg merge -q -P 6 2:2d95304fed5d 4:f25cbe84d8b3 5:a431fabd6039 6:e88e33f3bf62