view tests/test-merge-default.t @ 15708:309e49491253

push: propagate --new-branch and --ssh options when pushing subrepos

Up until now the all the push command options were ignored when pushing
subrepos. In particular, the fact that the --new-branch command was not passed
down to subrepos made it not possible to push a repo when any of its
subrepos had a new branch, even if you used the --new-branch option of the push
command.

In addition the error message was confusing since it showed the following hint:
"--new-branch hint: use 'hg push --new-branch' to create new remote branches".
However using the --new_branch flag did not fix the problem, as it was ignored
when pushing subrepos.

This patch passes the --new-branch and --ssh flags to every subrepo that is
pushed.

Issues/Limitations:

- All subrepo types get these flags, but only the mercurial subrepos use them.
- It is no longer possible to _not_ pass down these flags to subrepos when
pushing:
   * An alternative would be to introduce a --subrepos flag that should be
used to pass down these flags to the subrepos.
   * If we did this, it could make sense to make the --force flag respect this
   new --subrepos flag as well for consistency's sake.
- Matt suggested that the ssh related flags could also be passed down to
subrepos during pull and clone. However it seems that it would be the "update"
command that would need to get those, since subrepos are only pulled on update.
In any case I'd prefer to leave that for a later patch.

  $ hg init
  $ echo a > a
  $ hg commit -A -ma
  adding a

  $ echo b >> a
  $ hg commit -mb

  $ echo c >> a
  $ hg commit -mc

  $ hg up 1
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ echo d >> a
  $ hg commit -md
  created new head

  $ hg up 1
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ echo e >> a
  $ hg commit -me
  created new head

  $ hg up 1
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved

Should fail because not at a head:

  $ hg merge
  abort: branch 'default' has 3 heads - please merge with an explicit rev
  (run 'hg heads .' to see heads)
  [255]

  $ hg up
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved

Should fail because > 2 heads:

  $ HGMERGE=internal:other; export HGMERGE
  $ hg merge
  abort: branch 'default' has 3 heads - please merge with an explicit rev
  (run 'hg heads .' to see heads)
  [255]

Should succeed:

  $ hg merge 2
  0 files updated, 1 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (branch merge, don't forget to commit)
  $ hg commit -mm1

Should succeed - 2 heads:

  $ hg merge -P
  changeset:   3:ea9ff125ff88
  parent:      1:1846eede8b68
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
  summary:     d
  
  $ hg merge
  0 files updated, 1 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (branch merge, don't forget to commit)
  $ hg commit -mm2

Should fail because at tip:

  $ hg merge
  abort: nothing to merge
  [255]

  $ hg up 0
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved

Should fail because there is only one head:

  $ hg merge
  abort: nothing to merge
  (use 'hg update' instead)
  [255]

  $ hg up 3
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved

  $ echo f >> a
  $ hg branch foobranch
  marked working directory as branch foobranch
  (branches are permanent and global, did you want a bookmark?)
  $ hg commit -mf

Should fail because merge with other branch:

  $ hg merge
  abort: branch 'foobranch' has one head - please merge with an explicit rev
  (run 'hg heads' to see all heads)
  [255]


Test for issue2043: ensure that 'merge -P' shows ancestors of 6 that
are not ancestors of 7, regardless of where their least common
ancestor is.

Merge preview not affected by common ancestor:

  $ hg up -q 7
  $ hg merge -q -P 6
  2:2d95304fed5d
  4:f25cbe84d8b3
  5:a431fabd6039
  6:e88e33f3bf62