view tests/test-batching.py @ 23976:344939126579 stable

largefiles: don't interfere with logging normal files The previous code was adding standin files to the matcher's file list when neither the standin file nor the original existed in the context. Somehow, this was confusing the logging code into behaving differently from when the extension wasn't loaded. It seems that this was an attempt to support naming a directory that only contains largefiles, as a test fails if the else clause is dropped entirely. Therefore, only append the "standin" if it is a directory. This was found by running the test suite with --config extensions.largefiles=. The first added test used to log an additional cset that wasn't logged normally. The only relation it had to file 'a' is that 'a' was the source of a move, but it isn't clear why having '.hglf/a' in the list causes this change: @@ -47,6 +47,11 @@ Make sure largefiles doesn't interfere with logging a regular file $ hg log a --config extensions.largefiles= + changeset: 3:2ca5ba701980 + user: test + date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:04 1970 +0000 + summary: d + changeset: 0:9161b9aeaf16 user: test date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:01 1970 +0000 The second added test used to complain about a file not being in the parent revision: @@ -1638,10 +1643,8 @@ Ensure that largefiles doesn't intefere with following a normal file $ hg --config extensions.largefiles= log -f d -T '{desc}' -G - @ c - | - o a - + abort: cannot follow file not in parent revision: ".hglf/d" + [255] $ hg log -f d/a -T '{desc}' -G @ c | Note that there is still something fishy with the largefiles code, because when using a glob pattern like this: $ hg log 'glob:sub/*' the pattern list would contain '.hglf/glob:sub/*'. None of the tests show this (this test lives in test-largefiles.t at 1349), it was just something that I noticed when the code was loaded up with print statements.
author Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com>
date Fri, 30 Jan 2015 20:44:11 -0500
parents a7d5816087a9
children cbbdd085c991
line wrap: on
line source

# test-batching.py - tests for transparent command batching
#
# Copyright 2011 Peter Arrenbrecht <peter@arrenbrecht.ch>
#
# This software may be used and distributed according to the terms of the
# GNU General Public License version 2 or any later version.

from mercurial.wireproto import localbatch, remotebatch, batchable, future

# equivalent of repo.repository
class thing(object):
    def hello(self):
        return "Ready."

# equivalent of localrepo.localrepository
class localthing(thing):
    def foo(self, one, two=None):
        if one:
            return "%s and %s" % (one, two,)
        return "Nope"
    def bar(self, b, a):
        return "%s und %s" % (b, a,)
    def greet(self, name=None):
        return "Hello, %s" % name
    def batch(self):
        '''Support for local batching.'''
        return localbatch(self)

# usage of "thing" interface
def use(it):

    # Direct call to base method shared between client and server.
    print it.hello()

    # Direct calls to proxied methods. They cause individual roundtrips.
    print it.foo("Un", two="Deux")
    print it.bar("Eins", "Zwei")

    # Batched call to a couple of (possibly proxied) methods.
    batch = it.batch()
    # The calls return futures to eventually hold results.
    foo = batch.foo(one="One", two="Two")
    foo2 = batch.foo(None)
    bar = batch.bar("Eins", "Zwei")
    # We can call non-batchable proxy methods, but the break the current batch
    # request and cause additional roundtrips.
    greet = batch.greet(name="John Smith")
    # We can also add local methods into the mix, but they break the batch too.
    hello = batch.hello()
    bar2 = batch.bar(b="Uno", a="Due")
    # Only now are all the calls executed in sequence, with as few roundtrips
    # as possible.
    batch.submit()
    # After the call to submit, the futures actually contain values.
    print foo.value
    print foo2.value
    print bar.value
    print greet.value
    print hello.value
    print bar2.value

# local usage
mylocal = localthing()
print
print "== Local"
use(mylocal)

# demo remoting; mimicks what wireproto and HTTP/SSH do

# shared

def escapearg(plain):
    return (plain
            .replace(':', '::')
            .replace(',', ':,')
            .replace(';', ':;')
            .replace('=', ':='))
def unescapearg(escaped):
    return (escaped
            .replace(':=', '=')
            .replace(':;', ';')
            .replace(':,', ',')
            .replace('::', ':'))

# server side

# equivalent of wireproto's global functions
class server(object):
    def __init__(self, local):
        self.local = local
    def _call(self, name, args):
        args = dict(arg.split('=', 1) for arg in args)
        return getattr(self, name)(**args)
    def perform(self, req):
        print "REQ:", req
        name, args = req.split('?', 1)
        args = args.split('&')
        vals = dict(arg.split('=', 1) for arg in args)
        res = getattr(self, name)(**vals)
        print "  ->", res
        return res
    def batch(self, cmds):
        res = []
        for pair in cmds.split(';'):
            name, args = pair.split(':', 1)
            vals = {}
            for a in args.split(','):
                if a:
                    n, v = a.split('=')
                    vals[n] = unescapearg(v)
            res.append(escapearg(getattr(self, name)(**vals)))
        return ';'.join(res)
    def foo(self, one, two):
        return mangle(self.local.foo(unmangle(one), unmangle(two)))
    def bar(self, b, a):
        return mangle(self.local.bar(unmangle(b), unmangle(a)))
    def greet(self, name):
        return mangle(self.local.greet(unmangle(name)))
myserver = server(mylocal)

# local side

# equivalent of wireproto.encode/decodelist, that is, type-specific marshalling
# here we just transform the strings a bit to check we're properly en-/decoding
def mangle(s):
    return ''.join(chr(ord(c) + 1) for c in s)
def unmangle(s):
    return ''.join(chr(ord(c) - 1) for c in s)

# equivalent of wireproto.wirerepository and something like http's wire format
class remotething(thing):
    def __init__(self, server):
        self.server = server
    def _submitone(self, name, args):
        req = name + '?' + '&'.join(['%s=%s' % (n, v) for n, v in args])
        return self.server.perform(req)
    def _submitbatch(self, cmds):
        req = []
        for name, args in cmds:
            args = ','.join(n + '=' + escapearg(v) for n, v in args)
            req.append(name + ':' + args)
        req = ';'.join(req)
        res = self._submitone('batch', [('cmds', req,)])
        return res.split(';')

    def batch(self):
        return remotebatch(self)

    @batchable
    def foo(self, one, two=None):
        if not one:
            yield "Nope", None
        encargs = [('one', mangle(one),), ('two', mangle(two),)]
        encresref = future()
        yield encargs, encresref
        yield unmangle(encresref.value)

    @batchable
    def bar(self, b, a):
        encresref = future()
        yield [('b', mangle(b),), ('a', mangle(a),)], encresref
        yield unmangle(encresref.value)

    # greet is coded directly. It therefore does not support batching. If it
    # does appear in a batch, the batch is split around greet, and the call to
    # greet is done in its own roundtrip.
    def greet(self, name=None):
        return unmangle(self._submitone('greet', [('name', mangle(name),)]))

# demo remote usage

myproxy = remotething(myserver)
print
print "== Remote"
use(myproxy)