view tests/test-bundle-vs-outgoing.t @ 23976:344939126579 stable

largefiles: don't interfere with logging normal files

The previous code was adding standin files to the matcher's file list when
neither the standin file nor the original existed in the context.  Somehow, this
was confusing the logging code into behaving differently from when the extension
wasn't loaded.

It seems that this was an attempt to support naming a directory that only
contains largefiles, as a test fails if the else clause is dropped entirely.
Therefore, only append the "standin" if it is a directory.  This was found by
running the test suite with --config extensions.largefiles=.

The first added test used to log an additional cset that wasn't logged normally.
The only relation it had to file 'a' is that 'a' was the source of a move, but
it isn't clear why having '.hglf/a' in the list causes this change:

    @@ -47,6 +47,11 @@

     Make sure largefiles doesn't interfere with logging a regular file
       $ hg log a --config extensions.largefiles=
    +  changeset:   3:2ca5ba701980
    +  user:        test
    +  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:04 1970 +0000
    +  summary:     d
    +
       changeset:   0:9161b9aeaf16
       user:        test
       date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:01 1970 +0000

The second added test used to complain about a file not being in the parent
revision:

    @@ -1638,10 +1643,8 @@

     Ensure that largefiles doesn't intefere with following a normal file
       $ hg  --config extensions.largefiles= log -f d -T '{desc}' -G
    -  @  c
    -  |
    -  o  a
    -
    +  abort: cannot follow file not in parent revision: ".hglf/d"
    +  [255]
       $ hg log -f d/a -T '{desc}' -G
       @  c
       |

Note that there is still something fishy with the largefiles code, because when
using a glob pattern like this:

    $ hg log 'glob:sub/*'

the pattern list would contain '.hglf/glob:sub/*'.  None of the tests show this
(this test lives in test-largefiles.t at 1349), it was just something that I
noticed when the code was loaded up with print statements.

this structure seems to tickle a bug in bundle's search for
changesets, so first we have to recreate it

o  8
|
| o  7
| |
| o  6
|/|
o |  5
| |
o |  4
| |
| o  3
| |
| o  2
|/
o  1
|
o  0

  $ mkrev()
  > {
  >     revno=$1
  >     echo "rev $revno"
  >     echo "rev $revno" > foo.txt
  >     hg -q ci -m"rev $revno"
  > }

setup test repo1

  $ hg init repo1
  $ cd repo1
  $ echo "rev 0" > foo.txt
  $ hg ci -Am"rev 0"
  adding foo.txt
  $ mkrev 1
  rev 1

first branch

  $ mkrev 2
  rev 2
  $ mkrev 3
  rev 3

back to rev 1 to create second branch

  $ hg up -r1
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ mkrev 4
  rev 4
  $ mkrev 5
  rev 5

merge first branch to second branch

  $ hg up -C -r5
  0 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ HGMERGE=internal:local hg merge
  0 files updated, 1 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (branch merge, don't forget to commit)
  $ echo "merge rev 5, rev 3" > foo.txt
  $ hg ci -m"merge first branch to second branch"

one more commit following the merge

  $ mkrev 7
  rev 7

back to "second branch" to make another head

  $ hg up -r5
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ mkrev 8
  rev 8

the story so far

  $ hg log -G --template "{rev}\n"
  @  8
  |
  | o  7
  | |
  | o  6
  |/|
  o |  5
  | |
  o |  4
  | |
  | o  3
  | |
  | o  2
  |/
  o  1
  |
  o  0
  

check that "hg outgoing" really does the right thing

sanity check of outgoing: expect revs 4 5 6 7 8

  $ hg clone -r3 . ../repo2
  adding changesets
  adding manifests
  adding file changes
  added 4 changesets with 4 changes to 1 files
  updating to branch default
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved

this should (and does) report 5 outgoing revisions: 4 5 6 7 8

  $ hg outgoing --template "{rev}\n" ../repo2
  comparing with ../repo2
  searching for changes
  4
  5
  6
  7
  8

test bundle (destination repo): expect 5 revisions

this should bundle the same 5 revisions that outgoing reported, but it

actually bundles 7

  $ hg bundle foo.bundle ../repo2
  searching for changes
  5 changesets found

test bundle (base revision): expect 5 revisions

this should (and does) give exactly the same result as bundle

with a destination repo... i.e. it's wrong too

  $ hg bundle --base 3 foo.bundle
  5 changesets found

  $ cd ..