view tests/test-issue522.t @ 23976:344939126579 stable

largefiles: don't interfere with logging normal files

The previous code was adding standin files to the matcher's file list when
neither the standin file nor the original existed in the context.  Somehow, this
was confusing the logging code into behaving differently from when the extension
wasn't loaded.

It seems that this was an attempt to support naming a directory that only
contains largefiles, as a test fails if the else clause is dropped entirely.
Therefore, only append the "standin" if it is a directory.  This was found by
running the test suite with --config extensions.largefiles=.

The first added test used to log an additional cset that wasn't logged normally.
The only relation it had to file 'a' is that 'a' was the source of a move, but
it isn't clear why having '.hglf/a' in the list causes this change:

    @@ -47,6 +47,11 @@

     Make sure largefiles doesn't interfere with logging a regular file
       $ hg log a --config extensions.largefiles=
    +  changeset:   3:2ca5ba701980
    +  user:        test
    +  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:04 1970 +0000
    +  summary:     d
    +
       changeset:   0:9161b9aeaf16
       user:        test
       date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:01 1970 +0000

The second added test used to complain about a file not being in the parent
revision:

    @@ -1638,10 +1643,8 @@

     Ensure that largefiles doesn't intefere with following a normal file
       $ hg  --config extensions.largefiles= log -f d -T '{desc}' -G
    -  @  c
    -  |
    -  o  a
    -
    +  abort: cannot follow file not in parent revision: ".hglf/d"
    +  [255]
       $ hg log -f d/a -T '{desc}' -G
       @  c
       |

Note that there is still something fishy with the largefiles code, because when
using a glob pattern like this:

    $ hg log 'glob:sub/*'

the pattern list would contain '.hglf/glob:sub/*'.  None of the tests show this
(this test lives in test-largefiles.t at 1349), it was just something that I
noticed when the code was loaded up with print statements.

http://mercurial.selenic.com/bts/issue522

In the merge below, the file "foo" has the same contents in both
parents, but if we look at the file-level history, we'll notice that
the version in p1 is an ancestor of the version in p2. This test makes
sure that we'll use the version from p2 in the manifest of the merge
revision.

  $ hg init

  $ echo foo > foo
  $ hg ci -qAm 'add foo'

  $ echo bar >> foo
  $ hg ci -m 'change foo'

  $ hg backout -r tip -m 'backout changed foo'
  reverting foo
  changeset 2:4d9e78aaceee backs out changeset 1:b515023e500e

  $ hg up -C 0
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved

  $ touch bar
  $ hg ci -qAm 'add bar'

  $ hg merge --debug
    searching for copies back to rev 1
    unmatched files in local:
     bar
  resolving manifests
   branchmerge: True, force: False, partial: False
   ancestor: bbd179dfa0a7, local: 71766447bdbb+, remote: 4d9e78aaceee
   foo: remote is newer -> g
  getting foo
  updating: foo 1/1 files (100.00%)
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (branch merge, don't forget to commit)

  $ hg debugstate | grep foo
  m   0         -2 unset               foo

  $ hg st -A foo
  M foo

  $ hg ci -m 'merge'

  $ hg manifest --debug | grep foo
  c6fc755d7e68f49f880599da29f15add41f42f5a 644   foo

  $ hg debugindex foo
     rev    offset  length  ..... linkrev nodeid       p1           p2 (re)
       0         0       5  .....       0 2ed2a3912a0b 000000000000 000000000000 (re)
       1         5       9  .....       1 6f4310b00b9a 2ed2a3912a0b 000000000000 (re)
       2        14       5  .....       2 c6fc755d7e68 6f4310b00b9a 000000000000 (re)