Mercurial > hg
view tests/test-revert-interactive.t @ 41722:37b33c34bf4f
templatekw: add a {negrev} keyword
Revision numbers are getting much maligned for two reasons: they are
too long in large repos and users get confused by their local-only
nature. It just occurred to me that negative revision numbers avoid
both of those problems. Since negative revision numbers change
whenever the repo changes, it's much more obvious that they are a
local-only convenience. Additionally, for the recent commits that we
usually care about the most, negative revision numbers are always near
zero.
This commit adds a negrev templatekw to more easily expose negative
revision numbers. It's not easy to reliably produce this output with
existing keywords due to hidden commits while at the same time
ensuring good performance.
author | Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso <jordigh@octave.org> |
---|---|
date | Fri, 15 Feb 2019 14:43:31 -0500 |
parents | d783c937aa53 |
children | c1d83d916e85 |
line wrap: on
line source
Revert interactive tests 1 add and commit file f 2 add commit file folder1/g 3 add and commit file folder2/h 4 add and commit file folder1/i 5 commit change to file f 6 commit changes to files folder1/g folder2/h 7 commit changes to files folder1/g folder2/h 8 revert interactive to commit id 2 (line 3 above), check that folder1/i is removed and 9 make workdir match 7 10 run the same test than 8 from within folder1 and check same expectations $ cat <<EOF >> $HGRCPATH > [ui] > interactive = true > [extensions] > record = > purge = > EOF $ mkdir -p a/folder1 a/folder2 $ cd a $ hg init >>> open('f', 'wb').write(b"1\n2\n3\n4\n5\n") and None $ hg add f ; hg commit -m "adding f" $ cat f > folder1/g ; hg add folder1/g ; hg commit -m "adding folder1/g" $ cat f > folder2/h ; hg add folder2/h ; hg commit -m "adding folder2/h" $ cat f > folder1/i ; hg add folder1/i ; hg commit -m "adding folder1/i" >>> open('f', 'wb').write(b"a\n1\n2\n3\n4\n5\nb\n") and None $ hg commit -m "modifying f" >>> open('folder1/g', 'wb').write(b"c\n1\n2\n3\n4\n5\nd\n") and None $ hg commit -m "modifying folder1/g" >>> open('folder2/h', 'wb').write(b"e\n1\n2\n3\n4\n5\nf\n") and None $ hg commit -m "modifying folder2/h" $ hg tip changeset: 6:59dd6e4ab63a tag: tip user: test date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000 summary: modifying folder2/h $ hg revert -i -r 2 --all -- << EOF > y > y > y > y > y > ? > y > n > n > EOF remove added file folder1/i (Yn)? y removing folder1/i diff --git a/f b/f 2 hunks, 2 lines changed examine changes to 'f'? [Ynesfdaq?] y @@ -1,6 +1,5 @@ -a 1 2 3 4 5 apply change 1/6 to 'f'? [Ynesfdaq?] y @@ -2,6 +1,5 @@ 1 2 3 4 5 -b apply change 2/6 to 'f'? [Ynesfdaq?] y diff --git a/folder1/g b/folder1/g 2 hunks, 2 lines changed examine changes to 'folder1/g'? [Ynesfdaq?] y @@ -1,6 +1,5 @@ -c 1 2 3 4 5 apply change 3/6 to 'folder1/g'? [Ynesfdaq?] ? y - yes, apply this change n - no, skip this change e - edit this change manually s - skip remaining changes to this file f - apply remaining changes to this file d - done, skip remaining changes and files a - apply all changes to all remaining files q - quit, applying no changes ? - ? (display help) apply change 3/6 to 'folder1/g'? [Ynesfdaq?] y @@ -2,6 +1,5 @@ 1 2 3 4 5 -d apply change 4/6 to 'folder1/g'? [Ynesfdaq?] n diff --git a/folder2/h b/folder2/h 2 hunks, 2 lines changed examine changes to 'folder2/h'? [Ynesfdaq?] n reverting f reverting folder1/g $ cat f 1 2 3 4 5 $ cat folder1/g 1 2 3 4 5 d $ cat folder2/h e 1 2 3 4 5 f Test that --interactive lift the need for --all $ echo q | hg revert -i -r 2 diff --git a/folder1/g b/folder1/g 1 hunks, 1 lines changed examine changes to 'folder1/g'? [Ynesfdaq?] q abort: user quit [255] $ ls folder1/ g Test that a noop revert doesn't do an unnecessary backup $ (echo y; echo n) | hg revert -i -r 2 folder1/g diff --git a/folder1/g b/folder1/g 1 hunks, 1 lines changed examine changes to 'folder1/g'? [Ynesfdaq?] y @@ -3,4 +3,3 @@ 3 4 5 -d apply this change to 'folder1/g'? [Ynesfdaq?] n $ ls folder1/ g Test --no-backup $ (echo y; echo y) | hg revert -i -C -r 2 folder1/g diff --git a/folder1/g b/folder1/g 1 hunks, 1 lines changed examine changes to 'folder1/g'? [Ynesfdaq?] y @@ -3,4 +3,3 @@ 3 4 5 -d apply this change to 'folder1/g'? [Ynesfdaq?] y $ ls folder1/ g >>> open('folder1/g', 'wb').write(b"1\n2\n3\n4\n5\nd\n") and None $ hg update -C 6 3 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ hg revert -i -r 2 --all -- << EOF > n > y > y > y > y > y > n > n > EOF remove added file folder1/i (Yn)? n diff --git a/f b/f 2 hunks, 2 lines changed examine changes to 'f'? [Ynesfdaq?] y @@ -1,6 +1,5 @@ -a 1 2 3 4 5 apply change 1/6 to 'f'? [Ynesfdaq?] y @@ -2,6 +1,5 @@ 1 2 3 4 5 -b apply change 2/6 to 'f'? [Ynesfdaq?] y diff --git a/folder1/g b/folder1/g 2 hunks, 2 lines changed examine changes to 'folder1/g'? [Ynesfdaq?] y @@ -1,6 +1,5 @@ -c 1 2 3 4 5 apply change 3/6 to 'folder1/g'? [Ynesfdaq?] y @@ -2,6 +1,5 @@ 1 2 3 4 5 -d apply change 4/6 to 'folder1/g'? [Ynesfdaq?] n diff --git a/folder2/h b/folder2/h 2 hunks, 2 lines changed examine changes to 'folder2/h'? [Ynesfdaq?] n reverting f reverting folder1/g $ cat f 1 2 3 4 5 $ cat folder1/g 1 2 3 4 5 d $ cat folder2/h e 1 2 3 4 5 f $ hg st M f M folder1/g $ hg revert --interactive f << EOF > y > ? > y > n > n > EOF diff --git a/f b/f 2 hunks, 2 lines changed examine changes to 'f'? [Ynesfdaq?] y @@ -1,6 +1,5 @@ -a 1 2 3 4 5 discard change 1/2 to 'f'? [Ynesfdaq?] ? y - yes, discard this change n - no, skip this change e - edit this change manually s - skip remaining changes to this file f - discard remaining changes to this file d - done, skip remaining changes and files a - discard all changes to all remaining files q - quit, discarding no changes ? - ? (display help) discard change 1/2 to 'f'? [Ynesfdaq?] y @@ -2,6 +1,5 @@ 1 2 3 4 5 -b discard change 2/2 to 'f'? [Ynesfdaq?] n $ hg st M f M folder1/g ? f.orig $ cat f a 1 2 3 4 5 $ cat f.orig 1 2 3 4 5 $ rm f.orig $ hg update -C . 2 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved Check editing files newly added by a revert 1) Create a dummy editor changing 1 to 42 $ cat > $TESTTMP/editor.sh << '__EOF__' > cat "$1" | sed "s/1/42/g" > tt > mv tt "$1" > __EOF__ 2) Add k $ printf "1\n" > k $ hg add k $ hg commit -m "add k" 3) Use interactive revert with editing (replacing +1 with +42): $ printf "0\n2\n" > k $ HGEDITOR="\"sh\" \"${TESTTMP}/editor.sh\"" hg revert -i <<EOF > y > e > EOF diff --git a/k b/k 1 hunks, 2 lines changed examine changes to 'k'? [Ynesfdaq?] y @@ -1,1 +1,2 @@ -1 +0 +2 discard this change to 'k'? [Ynesfdaq?] e reverting k $ cat k 42 $ hg update -C . 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ hg purge $ touch newfile $ hg add newfile $ hg status A newfile $ hg revert -i <<EOF > n > EOF forget added file newfile (Yn)? n $ hg status A newfile $ hg revert -i <<EOF > y > EOF forget added file newfile (Yn)? y forgetting newfile $ hg status ? newfile When a line without EOL is selected during "revert -i" (issue5651) $ hg init $TESTTMP/revert-i-eol $ cd $TESTTMP/revert-i-eol $ echo 0 > a $ hg ci -qAm 0 $ printf 1 >> a $ hg ci -qAm 1 $ cat a 0 1 (no-eol) $ hg revert -ir'.^' <<EOF > y > y > EOF diff --git a/a b/a 1 hunks, 1 lines changed examine changes to 'a'? [Ynesfdaq?] y @@ -1,2 +1,1 @@ 0 -1 \ No newline at end of file apply this change to 'a'? [Ynesfdaq?] y reverting a $ cat a 0 When specified pattern does not exist, we should exit early (issue5789). $ hg files a $ hg rev b b: no such file in rev b40d1912accf $ hg rev -i b b: no such file in rev b40d1912accf $ cd .. Prompt before undeleting file(issue6008) $ hg init repo $ cd repo $ echo a > a $ hg ci -qAm a $ hg rm a $ hg revert -i<<EOF > y > EOF add back removed file a (Yn)? y undeleting a $ ls a $ hg rm a $ hg revert -i<<EOF > n > EOF add back removed file a (Yn)? n $ ls $ cd ..