tests/test-ancestor.py

phase: attach phase to the transaction instead of the lock

The phase cache file is no longer written on lock release, it is now handled by
the transaction (as changesets and obsolescence markers are).

(Hooray)

As we stop relying on the lock to write phase, repos with no existing phase
information will need to wait for a phase move or a strip to happen in order to
get the first write in the `phaseroots` file. This explain the change in
test-inherit-mode.t.

This should not have any side effects but in very obscure cases where
people interact with pre-2.1 and post-2.1 versions of Mercurial on the
same repo while having MQ patches applied but the MQ extension
disabled from time to time. A case unlikely enough to not be worth
preserving the old behavior with awful hacks.

from mercurial import ancestor, commands, hg, ui, util

# graph is a dict of child->parent adjacency lists for this graph:
# o  13
# |
# | o  12
# | |
# | | o    11
# | | |\
# | | | | o  10
# | | | | |
# | o---+ |  9
# | | | | |
# o | | | |  8
#  / / / /
# | | o |  7
# | | | |
# o---+ |  6
#  / / /
# | | o  5
# | |/
# | o  4
# | |
# o |  3
# | |
# | o  2
# |/
# o  1
# |
# o  0

graph = {0: [-1], 1: [0], 2: [1], 3: [1], 4: [2], 5: [4], 6: [4],
         7: [4], 8: [-1], 9: [6, 7], 10: [5], 11: [3, 7], 12: [9],
         13: [8]}
pfunc = graph.get

class mockchangelog(object):
    parentrevs = graph.get

def runmissingancestors(revs, bases):
    print "%% ancestors of %s and not of %s" % (revs, bases)
    print ancestor.missingancestors(revs, bases, pfunc)

def test_missingancestors():
    # Empty revs
    runmissingancestors([], [1])
    runmissingancestors([], [])

    # If bases is empty, it's the same as if it were [nullrev]
    runmissingancestors([12], [])

    # Trivial case: revs == bases
    runmissingancestors([0], [0])
    runmissingancestors([4, 5, 6], [6, 5, 4])

    # With nullrev
    runmissingancestors([-1], [12])
    runmissingancestors([12], [-1])

    # 9 is a parent of 12. 7 is a parent of 9, so an ancestor of 12. 6 is an
    # ancestor of 12 but not of 7.
    runmissingancestors([12], [9])
    runmissingancestors([9], [12])
    runmissingancestors([12, 9], [7])
    runmissingancestors([7, 6], [12])

    # More complex cases
    runmissingancestors([10], [11, 12])
    runmissingancestors([11], [10])
    runmissingancestors([11], [10, 12])
    runmissingancestors([12], [10])
    runmissingancestors([12], [11])
    runmissingancestors([10, 11, 12], [13])
    runmissingancestors([13], [10, 11, 12])

def genlazyancestors(revs, stoprev=0, inclusive=False):
    print ("%% lazy ancestor set for %s, stoprev = %s, inclusive = %s" %
           (revs, stoprev, inclusive))
    return ancestor.lazyancestors(mockchangelog, revs, stoprev=stoprev,
                                  inclusive=inclusive)

def printlazyancestors(s, l):
    print [n for n in l if n in s]

def test_lazyancestors():
    # Empty revs
    s = genlazyancestors([])
    printlazyancestors(s, [3, 0, -1])

    # Standard example
    s = genlazyancestors([11, 13])
    printlazyancestors(s, [11, 13, 7, 9, 8, 3, 6, 4, 1, -1, 0])

    # Including revs
    s = genlazyancestors([11, 13], inclusive=True)
    printlazyancestors(s, [11, 13, 7, 9, 8, 3, 6, 4, 1, -1, 0])

    # Test with stoprev
    s = genlazyancestors([11, 13], stoprev=6)
    printlazyancestors(s, [11, 13, 7, 9, 8, 3, 6, 4, 1, -1, 0])
    s = genlazyancestors([11, 13], stoprev=6, inclusive=True)
    printlazyancestors(s, [11, 13, 7, 9, 8, 3, 6, 4, 1, -1, 0])


# The C gca algorithm requires a real repo. These are textual descriptions of
# DAGs that have been known to be problematic.
dagtests = [
    '+2*2*2/*3/2',
    '+3*3/*2*2/*4*4/*4/2*4/2*2',
]
def test_gca():
    u = ui.ui()
    for i, dag in enumerate(dagtests):
        repo = hg.repository(u, 'gca%d' % i, create=1)
        cl = repo.changelog
        if not util.safehasattr(cl.index, 'ancestors'):
            # C version not available
            return

        commands.debugbuilddag(u, repo, dag)
        # Compare the results of the Python and C versions. This does not
        # include choosing a winner when more than one gca exists -- we make
        # sure both return exactly the same set of gcas.
        for a in cl:
            for b in cl:
                cgcas = sorted(cl.index.ancestors(a, b))
                pygcas = sorted(ancestor.ancestors(cl.parentrevs, a, b))
                if cgcas != pygcas:
                    print "test_gca: for dag %s, gcas for %d, %d:" % (dag, a, b)
                    print "  C returned:      %s" % cgcas
                    print "  Python returned: %s" % pygcas

if __name__ == '__main__':
    test_missingancestors()
    test_lazyancestors()
    test_gca()