Mercurial > hg
view tests/test-confused-revert.t @ 49320:3d3d7fc6035a stable
commit: allow to close branch when committing change over a closed head
Otherwise, an explicit other commit become necessary, which seems both silly and
verbose.
This is useful when merging closed heads on the same branches, for example when
merging multiple repositories together.
author | Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> |
---|---|
date | Tue, 14 Jun 2022 04:04:08 +0200 |
parents | 8d72e29ad1e0 |
children | 55c6ebd11cb9 |
line wrap: on
line source
$ hg init $ echo foo > a $ hg add a $ hg commit -m "1" $ echo bar > b $ hg add b $ hg remove a Should show a removed and b added: $ hg status A b R a $ hg revert --all forgetting b undeleting a Should show b unknown and a back to normal: $ hg status ? b $ rm b $ hg co -C 0 0 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ echo foo-a > a $ hg commit -m "2a" $ hg co -C 0 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ echo foo-b > a $ hg commit -m "2b" created new head $ HGMERGE=true hg merge 1 merging a 0 files updated, 1 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved (branch merge, don't forget to commit) Should show foo-b: $ cat a foo-b $ echo bar > b $ hg add b $ rm a $ hg remove a Should show a removed and b added: $ hg status A b R a Revert should fail: $ hg revert abort: uncommitted merge with no revision specified (use 'hg update' or see 'hg help revert') [10] Revert should be ok now: $ hg revert -r2 --all forgetting b undeleting a Should show b unknown and a marked modified (merged): $ hg status M a ? b Should show foo-b: $ cat a foo-b