view mercurial/node.py @ 44717:3dc6a70779f2

phabricator: add an option to fold several commits into one review (issue6244) Now that all of the pieces are in place, alter the user facing command to allow it. This is the default behavior when using `arc`, but I much prefer the 1:1 approach, and I'm tempted to mark this advanced to limit its abuse. I started out calling this `--no-stack` like the feature request suggested, but I found it less obvious (especially when writing the code), so I went with the `hg fold` analogue. This will populate the `Commits` tab in the web UI with the hash of each commit folded into the review. From experimentation, it seems to list them in the order they are received from the extension instead of the actual parent/child relationship. The extension sends them in sorted order, thanks to `templatefilters.json()`. Since there's enough info there for them to put things in the right order, JSON is unordered aside from lists (IIUC), and there doesn't seem to be any harmful side effects, I guess we write this off as their bug. It is simple enough to workaround by putting a check for `util.sortdict` into `templatefilters.json()`, and don't resort in that case. There are a handful of restrictions that are documented in the code, which somebody could probably fix if they're interested. Notably, this requires the (default) `--amend` option, because there's not an easy way to apply a local tag across several commits. This also doesn't do preflight checking to ensure that all previous commits that were part of a single review are selected when updating. That seems expensive. What happens is the excluded commit is dropped from the review, but it keeps the Differential Revision line in the commit message. Not everything can be edited, so it doesn't seem worth making the code even more complicated to handle this edge case. There are a couple of "obsolete feature not enabled but X markers found!" messages that appeared on Windows but not macOS. I have no idea what's going on here, but that's an unrelated issue, so I conditionalized those lines. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D8314
author Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com>
date Wed, 08 Apr 2020 17:30:10 -0400
parents 687b865b95ad
children 6266d19556ad
line wrap: on
line source

# node.py - basic nodeid manipulation for mercurial
#
# Copyright 2005, 2006 Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>
#
# This software may be used and distributed according to the terms of the
# GNU General Public License version 2 or any later version.

from __future__ import absolute_import

import binascii

# This ugly style has a noticeable effect in manifest parsing
hex = binascii.hexlify
# Adapt to Python 3 API changes. If this ends up showing up in
# profiles, we can use this version only on Python 3, and forward
# binascii.unhexlify like we used to on Python 2.
def bin(s):
    try:
        return binascii.unhexlify(s)
    except binascii.Error as e:
        raise TypeError(e)


nullrev = -1
# In hex, this is '0000000000000000000000000000000000000000'
nullid = b"\0" * 20
nullhex = hex(nullid)

# Phony node value to stand-in for new files in some uses of
# manifests.
# In hex, this is '2121212121212121212121212121212121212121'
newnodeid = b'!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!'
# In hex, this is '3030303030303030303030303030306164646564'
addednodeid = b'000000000000000added'
# In hex, this is '3030303030303030303030306d6f646966696564'
modifiednodeid = b'000000000000modified'

wdirfilenodeids = {newnodeid, addednodeid, modifiednodeid}

# pseudo identifiers for working directory
# (they are experimental, so don't add too many dependencies on them)
wdirrev = 0x7FFFFFFF
# In hex, this is 'ffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff'
wdirid = b"\xff" * 20
wdirhex = hex(wdirid)


def short(node):
    return hex(node[:6])