Mercurial > hg
view tests/test-addremove-similar.t @ 40923:3ed77780f4a6
wireprotov2: send linknodes to emitfilerevisions()
Previously, linknodes were calculated within emitfilerevisions() by
using filectx.introrev(), which would always use the linkrev/linknode
as recorded by storage. This is wrong for cases where the receiver
doesn't have the changeset the linknode refers to.
This commit changes the logic for linknode emission so the mapping
of filenode to linknode is computed by the caller and passed into
emitfilerevisions().
As part of the change, linknodes for "filesdata" in the
haveparents=False case are now correct: the existing code performed a
manifest walk and it was trivial to plug in the correct linknode.
However, behavior for the haveparents=True case is still wrong
because it relies on filtering linkrevs against the outgoing set in
order to determine what to send. This will be fixed in a subsequent
commit.
The change test test-wireproto-exchangev2-shallow.t is a bit wonky.
The test repo has 6 revisions. The changed test is performing a shallow
clone with depth=1. So, only file data for revision 5 is present
locally. So, the new behavior of associating the linknode with
revision 5 for every file revision seems correct. Of course, when
backfilling old revisions, we'll want to update the linknode. But
this problem requires wire protocol support and we'll cross that
bridge later.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D5405
author | Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> |
---|---|
date | Mon, 10 Dec 2018 18:04:12 +0000 |
parents | 5abc47d4ca6b |
children | 5b89626c11e9 |
line wrap: on
line source
$ hg init rep; cd rep $ touch empty-file $ "$PYTHON" -c 'for x in range(10000): print(x)' > large-file $ hg addremove adding empty-file adding large-file $ hg commit -m A $ rm large-file empty-file $ "$PYTHON" -c 'for x in range(10,10000): print(x)' > another-file $ hg addremove -s50 adding another-file removing empty-file removing large-file recording removal of large-file as rename to another-file (99% similar) $ hg commit -m B comparing two empty files caused ZeroDivisionError in the past $ hg update -C 0 2 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ rm empty-file $ touch another-empty-file $ hg addremove -s50 adding another-empty-file removing empty-file $ cd .. $ hg init rep2; cd rep2 $ "$PYTHON" -c 'for x in range(10000): print(x)' > large-file $ "$PYTHON" -c 'for x in range(50): print(x)' > tiny-file $ hg addremove adding large-file adding tiny-file $ hg commit -m A $ "$PYTHON" -c 'for x in range(70): print(x)' > small-file $ rm tiny-file $ rm large-file $ hg addremove -s50 removing large-file adding small-file removing tiny-file recording removal of tiny-file as rename to small-file (82% similar) $ hg commit -m B should be sorted by path for stable result $ for i in `"$PYTHON" $TESTDIR/seq.py 0 9`; do > cp small-file $i > done $ rm small-file $ hg addremove adding 0 adding 1 adding 2 adding 3 adding 4 adding 5 adding 6 adding 7 adding 8 adding 9 removing small-file recording removal of small-file as rename to 0 (100% similar) recording removal of small-file as rename to 1 (100% similar) recording removal of small-file as rename to 2 (100% similar) recording removal of small-file as rename to 3 (100% similar) recording removal of small-file as rename to 4 (100% similar) recording removal of small-file as rename to 5 (100% similar) recording removal of small-file as rename to 6 (100% similar) recording removal of small-file as rename to 7 (100% similar) recording removal of small-file as rename to 8 (100% similar) recording removal of small-file as rename to 9 (100% similar) $ hg commit -m '10 same files' pick one from many identical files $ cp 0 a $ rm `"$PYTHON" $TESTDIR/seq.py 0 9` $ hg addremove removing 0 removing 1 removing 2 removing 3 removing 4 removing 5 removing 6 removing 7 removing 8 removing 9 adding a recording removal of 0 as rename to a (100% similar) $ hg revert -aq pick one from many similar files $ cp 0 a $ for i in `"$PYTHON" $TESTDIR/seq.py 0 9`; do > echo $i >> $i > done $ hg commit -m 'make them slightly different' $ rm `"$PYTHON" $TESTDIR/seq.py 0 9` $ hg addremove -s50 removing 0 removing 1 removing 2 removing 3 removing 4 removing 5 removing 6 removing 7 removing 8 removing 9 adding a recording removal of 0 as rename to a (99% similar) $ hg commit -m 'always the same file should be selected' should all fail $ hg addremove -s foo abort: similarity must be a number [255] $ hg addremove -s -1 abort: similarity must be between 0 and 100 [255] $ hg addremove -s 1e6 abort: similarity must be between 0 and 100 [255] $ cd .. Issue1527: repeated addremove causes Abort $ hg init rep3; cd rep3 $ mkdir d $ echo a > d/a $ hg add d/a $ hg commit -m 1 $ mv d/a d/b $ hg addremove -s80 removing d/a adding d/b recording removal of d/a as rename to d/b (100% similar) $ hg debugstate r 0 0 1970-01-01 00:00:00 d/a a 0 -1 unset d/b copy: d/a -> d/b $ mv d/b c no copies found here (since the target isn't in d $ hg addremove -s80 d removing d/b copies here $ hg addremove -s80 adding c recording removal of d/a as rename to c (100% similar) $ cd ..