wireprotov2: send linknodes to emitfilerevisions()
Previously, linknodes were calculated within emitfilerevisions() by
using filectx.introrev(), which would always use the linkrev/linknode
as recorded by storage. This is wrong for cases where the receiver
doesn't have the changeset the linknode refers to.
This commit changes the logic for linknode emission so the mapping
of filenode to linknode is computed by the caller and passed into
emitfilerevisions().
As part of the change, linknodes for "filesdata" in the
haveparents=False case are now correct: the existing code performed a
manifest walk and it was trivial to plug in the correct linknode.
However, behavior for the haveparents=True case is still wrong
because it relies on filtering linkrevs against the outgoing set in
order to determine what to send. This will be fixed in a subsequent
commit.
The change test test-wireproto-exchangev2-shallow.t is a bit wonky.
The test repo has 6 revisions. The changed test is performing a shallow
clone with depth=1. So, only file data for revision 5 is present
locally. So, the new behavior of associating the linknode with
revision 5 for every file revision seems correct. Of course, when
backfilling old revisions, we'll want to update the linknode. But
this problem requires wire protocol support and we'll cross that
bridge later.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D5405
Create a repo and add some commits
$ hg init mm
$ cd mm
$ echo "Test content" > testfile1
$ hg add testfile1
$ hg commit -m "First commit" -u "Proper <commit@m.c>"
$ echo "Test content 2" > testfile2
$ hg add testfile2
$ hg commit -m "Second commit" -u "Commit Name 2 <commit2@m.c>"
$ echo "Test content 3" > testfile3
$ hg add testfile3
$ hg commit -m "Third commit" -u "Commit Name 3 <commit3@m.c>"
$ echo "Test content 4" > testfile4
$ hg add testfile4
$ hg commit -m "Fourth commit" -u "Commit Name 4 <commit4@m.c>"
Add a .mailmap file with each possible entry type plus comments
$ cat > .mailmap << EOF
> # Comment shouldn't break anything
> <proper@m.c> <commit@m.c> # Should update email only
> Proper Name 2 <commit2@m.c> # Should update name only
> Proper Name 3 <proper@m.c> <commit3@m.c> # Should update name, email due to email
> Proper Name 4 <proper@m.c> Commit Name 4 <commit4@m.c> # Should update name, email due to name, email
> EOF
$ hg add .mailmap
$ hg commit -m "Add mailmap file" -u "Testuser <test123@m.c>"
Output of commits should be normal without filter
$ hg log -T "{author}\n" -r "all()"
Proper <commit@m.c>
Commit Name 2 <commit2@m.c>
Commit Name 3 <commit3@m.c>
Commit Name 4 <commit4@m.c>
Testuser <test123@m.c>
Output of commits with filter shows their mailmap values
$ hg log -T "{mailmap(author)}\n" -r "all()"
Proper <proper@m.c>
Proper Name 2 <commit2@m.c>
Proper Name 3 <proper@m.c>
Proper Name 4 <proper@m.c>
Testuser <test123@m.c>
Add new mailmap entry for testuser
$ cat >> .mailmap << EOF
> <newmmentry@m.c> <test123@m.c>
> EOF
Output of commits with filter shows their updated mailmap values
$ hg log -T "{mailmap(author)}\n" -r "all()"
Proper <proper@m.c>
Proper Name 2 <commit2@m.c>
Proper Name 3 <proper@m.c>
Proper Name 4 <proper@m.c>
Testuser <newmmentry@m.c>
A commit with improperly formatted user field should not break the filter
$ echo "some more test content" > testfile1
$ hg commit -m "Commit with improper user field" -u "Improper user"
$ hg log -T "{mailmap(author)}\n" -r "all()"
Proper <proper@m.c>
Proper Name 2 <commit2@m.c>
Proper Name 3 <proper@m.c>
Proper Name 4 <proper@m.c>
Testuser <newmmentry@m.c>
Improper user
No TypeError beacause of invalid input
$ hg log -T '{mailmap(termwidth)}\n' -r0
80