view tests/test-merge-remove.t @ 40923:3ed77780f4a6

wireprotov2: send linknodes to emitfilerevisions()

Previously, linknodes were calculated within emitfilerevisions() by
using filectx.introrev(), which would always use the linkrev/linknode
as recorded by storage. This is wrong for cases where the receiver
doesn't have the changeset the linknode refers to.

This commit changes the logic for linknode emission so the mapping
of filenode to linknode is computed by the caller and passed into
emitfilerevisions().

As part of the change, linknodes for "filesdata" in the
haveparents=False case are now correct: the existing code performed a
manifest walk and it was trivial to plug in the correct linknode.

However, behavior for the haveparents=True case is still wrong
because it relies on filtering linkrevs against the outgoing set in
order to determine what to send. This will be fixed in a subsequent
commit.

The change test test-wireproto-exchangev2-shallow.t is a bit wonky.
The test repo has 6 revisions. The changed test is performing a shallow
clone with depth=1. So, only file data for revision 5 is present
locally. So, the new behavior of associating the linknode with
revision 5 for every file revision seems correct. Of course, when
backfilling old revisions, we'll want to update the linknode. But
this problem requires wire protocol support and we'll cross that
bridge later.

Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D5405

  $ hg init

  $ echo foo > foo
  $ echo bar > bar
  $ hg ci -qAm 'add foo bar'

  $ echo foo2 >> foo
  $ echo bleh > bar
  $ hg ci -m 'change foo bar'

  $ hg up -qC 0
  $ hg mv foo foo1
  $ echo foo1 > foo1
  $ hg cat foo >> foo1
  $ hg ci -m 'mv foo foo1'
  created new head

  $ hg merge
  merging foo1 and foo to foo1
  1 files updated, 1 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (branch merge, don't forget to commit)

  $ hg debugstate --no-dates
  m   0         -2 unset               bar
  m   0         -2 unset               foo1
  copy: foo -> foo1

  $ hg st -q
  M bar
  M foo1


Removing foo1 and bar:

  $ cp foo1 F
  $ cp bar B
  $ hg rm -f foo1 bar

  $ hg debugstate --no-dates
  r   0         -1 set                 bar
  r   0         -1 set                 foo1
  copy: foo -> foo1

  $ hg st -qC
  R bar
  R foo1


Re-adding foo1 and bar:

  $ cp F foo1
  $ cp B bar
  $ hg add -v foo1 bar
  adding bar
  adding foo1

  $ hg debugstate --no-dates
  n   0         -2 unset               bar
  n   0         -2 unset               foo1
  copy: foo -> foo1

  $ hg st -qC
  M bar
  M foo1
    foo


Reverting foo1 and bar:

  $ hg revert -vr . foo1 bar
  saving current version of bar as bar.orig
  saving current version of foo1 as foo1.orig
  reverting bar
  reverting foo1

  $ hg debugstate --no-dates
  n   0         -2 unset               bar
  n   0         -2 unset               foo1
  copy: foo -> foo1

  $ hg st -qC
  M bar
  M foo1
    foo

  $ hg diff

Merge should not overwrite local file that is untracked after remove

  $ rm *
  $ hg up -qC
  $ hg rm bar
  $ hg ci -m 'remove bar'
  $ echo 'memories of buried pirate treasure' > bar
  $ hg merge
  bar: untracked file differs
  abort: untracked files in working directory differ from files in requested revision
  [255]
  $ cat bar
  memories of buried pirate treasure

Those who use force will lose

  $ hg merge -f
  file 'bar' was deleted in local [working copy] but was modified in other [merge rev].
  What do you want to do?
  use (c)hanged version, leave (d)eleted, or leave (u)nresolved? u
  merging foo1 and foo to foo1
  0 files updated, 1 files merged, 0 files removed, 1 files unresolved
  use 'hg resolve' to retry unresolved file merges or 'hg merge --abort' to abandon
  [1]
  $ cat bar
  bleh
  $ hg st
  M bar
  M foo1