Mercurial > hg
view tests/test-unified-test.t @ 38483:3efadf2317c7
windows: add a method to convert Unix style command lines to Windows style
This started as a copy/paste of `os.path.expandvars()`, but limited to a given
dictionary of variables, converting `foo = foo + bar` to `foo += bar`, and
adding 'b' string prefixes. Then code was added to make sure that a value being
substituted in wouldn't itself be expanded by cmd.exe. But that left
inconsistent results between `$var1` and `%var1%` when its value was '%foo%'-
since neither were touched, `$var1` wouldn't expand but `%var1%` would. So
instead, this just converts the Unix style to Windows style (if the variable
exists, because Windows will leave `%missing%` as-is), and lets cmd.exe do its
thing.
I then dropped the %% -> % conversion (because Windows doesn't do this), and
added the ability to escape the '$' with '\'. The escape character is dropped,
for consistency with shell handling.
After everything seemed stable and working, running the whole test suite flagged
a problem near the end of test-bookmarks.t:1069. The problem is cmd.exe won't
pass empty variables to its child, so defined but empty variables are now
skipped. I can't think of anything better, and it seems like a pre-existing
violation of the documentation, which calls out that HG_OLDNODE is empty on
bookmark creation.
Future additions could potentially be replacing strong quotes with double quotes
(cmd.exe doesn't know what to do with the former), escaping a double quote, and
some tilde expansion via os.path.expanduser(). I've got some doubts about
replacing the strong quotes in case sh.exe is run, but it seems like the right
thing to do the vast majority of the time. The original form of this was
discussed about a year ago[1].
[1] https://www.mercurial-scm.org/pipermail/mercurial-devel/2017-July/100735.html
author | Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com> |
---|---|
date | Sun, 24 Jun 2018 01:13:09 -0400 |
parents | e504fa630860 |
children | bd0f122f3f51 |
line wrap: on
line source
Test that the syntax of "unified tests" is properly processed ============================================================== Simple commands: $ echo foo foo $ printf 'oh no' oh no (no-eol) $ printf 'bar\nbaz\n' | cat bar baz Multi-line command: $ foo() { > echo bar > } $ foo bar Return codes before inline python: $ sh -c 'exit 1' [1] Doctest commands: >>> from __future__ import print_function >>> print('foo') foo $ echo interleaved interleaved >>> for c in 'xyz': ... print(c) x y z >>> print() >>> foo = 'global name' >>> def func(): ... print(foo, 'should be visible in func()') >>> func() global name should be visible in func() >>> print('''multiline ... string''') multiline string Regular expressions: $ echo foobarbaz foobar.* (re) $ echo barbazquux .*quux.* (re) Globs: $ printf '* \\foobarbaz {10}\n' \* \\fo?bar* {10} (glob) Literal match ending in " (re)": $ echo 'foo (re)' foo (re) Windows: \r\n is handled like \n and can be escaped: #if windows $ printf 'crlf\r\ncr\r\tcrlf\r\ncrlf\r\n' crlf cr\r (no-eol) (esc) \tcrlf (esc) crlf\r (esc) #endif Combining esc with other markups - and handling lines ending with \r instead of \n: $ printf 'foo/bar\r' fo?/bar\r (no-eol) (glob) (esc) #if windows $ printf 'foo\\bar\r' foo/bar\r (no-eol) (esc) #endif $ printf 'foo/bar\rfoo/bar\r' foo.bar\r [(]no-eol[)] (re) (esc) foo.bar\r \(no-eol\) (re) testing hghave $ hghave true $ hghave false skipped: missing feature: nail clipper [1] $ hghave no-true skipped: system supports yak shaving [1] $ hghave no-false Conditional sections based on hghave: #if true $ echo tested tested #else $ echo skipped #endif #if false $ echo skipped #else $ echo tested tested #endif #if no-false $ echo tested tested #else $ echo skipped #endif #if no-true $ echo skipped #else $ echo tested tested #endif Exit code: $ (exit 1) [1]