Mercurial > hg
view tests/test-confused-revert.t @ 46103:3f82a915ab2a
histedit: tweak `edit` message to try and guide users to our workflow
histedit predates evolve, so it drops you on an _uncommitted_ version
of the commit you're amending/splitting, which is in contrast to git
which expects you to use `git commit --amend` (I think - I'm basing
this on internal bug reports). My hope is that this output will guide
users a little more towards the expected workflow.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D9560
author | Augie Fackler <augie@google.com> |
---|---|
date | Thu, 10 Dec 2020 11:42:49 -0500 |
parents | 8d72e29ad1e0 |
children | 55c6ebd11cb9 |
line wrap: on
line source
$ hg init $ echo foo > a $ hg add a $ hg commit -m "1" $ echo bar > b $ hg add b $ hg remove a Should show a removed and b added: $ hg status A b R a $ hg revert --all forgetting b undeleting a Should show b unknown and a back to normal: $ hg status ? b $ rm b $ hg co -C 0 0 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ echo foo-a > a $ hg commit -m "2a" $ hg co -C 0 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ echo foo-b > a $ hg commit -m "2b" created new head $ HGMERGE=true hg merge 1 merging a 0 files updated, 1 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved (branch merge, don't forget to commit) Should show foo-b: $ cat a foo-b $ echo bar > b $ hg add b $ rm a $ hg remove a Should show a removed and b added: $ hg status A b R a Revert should fail: $ hg revert abort: uncommitted merge with no revision specified (use 'hg update' or see 'hg help revert') [10] Revert should be ok now: $ hg revert -r2 --all forgetting b undeleting a Should show b unknown and a marked modified (merged): $ hg status M a ? b Should show foo-b: $ cat a foo-b