view tests/test-issue619.t @ 46103:3f82a915ab2a

histedit: tweak `edit` message to try and guide users to our workflow

histedit predates evolve, so it drops you on an _uncommitted_ version
of the commit you're amending/splitting, which is in contrast to git
which expects you to use `git commit --amend` (I think - I'm basing
this on internal bug reports). My hope is that this output will guide
users a little more towards the expected workflow.

Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D9560

https://bz.mercurial-scm.org/619

  $ hg init
  $ echo a > a
  $ hg ci -Ama
  adding a

  $ echo b > b
  $ hg branch b
  marked working directory as branch b
  (branches are permanent and global, did you want a bookmark?)
  $ hg ci -Amb
  adding b

  $ hg co -C 0
  0 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved

Fast-forward:

  $ hg merge b
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (branch merge, don't forget to commit)
  $ hg ci -Ammerge

Bogus fast-forward should fail:

  $ hg merge b
  abort: merging with a working directory ancestor has no effect
  [255]

Even with strange revset (issue4465)

  $ hg merge ::.
  abort: merging with a working directory ancestor has no effect
  [255]