view tests/sitecustomize.py @ 33614:41081364addb stable

tests: clarify that duplicate flag processors is not an error

The flag processors test for duplicate processors for a single flag
was misleading because the file from the previous test case caused it
to fail (making the "echo 'this should fail' > file" part
irrelevant). Let's remove the leftover from the previous test case to
make it clear that duplicate flag processors results only in a
warning.

Note that duplicate flag processors would have resulted in a failure
(not just a warning) until ea1c2eb7abd3 (extensions: catch uisetup and
extsetup failures and don't let them break hg, 2017-06-06). I remember
expressing my concern about ending up with half-loaded extensions. It
would be pretty unfortunate to have double-encoded revlog content
enter a repo, so maybe we should reconsider?

Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D201

from __future__ import absolute_import
import os

if os.environ.get('COVERAGE_PROCESS_START'):
    try:
        import coverage
        import uuid

        covpath = os.path.join(os.environ['COVERAGE_DIR'],
                               'cov.%s' % uuid.uuid1())
        cov = coverage.coverage(data_file=covpath, auto_data=True)
        cov._warn_no_data = False
        cov._warn_unimported_source = False
        cov.start()
    except ImportError:
        pass