view tests/test-check-commit.t @ 33614:41081364addb stable

tests: clarify that duplicate flag processors is not an error The flag processors test for duplicate processors for a single flag was misleading because the file from the previous test case caused it to fail (making the "echo 'this should fail' > file" part irrelevant). Let's remove the leftover from the previous test case to make it clear that duplicate flag processors results only in a warning. Note that duplicate flag processors would have resulted in a failure (not just a warning) until ea1c2eb7abd3 (extensions: catch uisetup and extsetup failures and don't let them break hg, 2017-06-06). I remember expressing my concern about ending up with half-loaded extensions. It would be pretty unfortunate to have double-encoded revlog content enter a repo, so maybe we should reconsider? Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D201
author Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com>
date Mon, 31 Jul 2017 16:40:31 -0700
parents ddd65b4f3ae6
children 8872d46643b6
line wrap: on
line source

#require test-repo

Enable obsolescence to avoid the warning issue when obsmarker are found

  $ . "$TESTDIR/helpers-testrepo.sh"

Go back in the hg repo

  $ cd $TESTDIR/..

  $ for node in `testrepohg log --rev 'not public() and ::. and not desc("# no-check-commit")' --template '{node|short}\n'`; do
  >    testrepohg export --git $node \
  >        | contrib/check-commit > ${TESTTMP}/check-commit.out
  >    if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then
  >        echo "Revision $node does not comply with rules"
  >        echo '------------------------------------------------------'
  >        cat ${TESTTMP}/check-commit.out
  >        echo
  >   fi
  > done