view tests/test-revlog-packentry.t @ 33614:41081364addb stable

tests: clarify that duplicate flag processors is not an error

The flag processors test for duplicate processors for a single flag
was misleading because the file from the previous test case caused it
to fail (making the "echo 'this should fail' > file" part
irrelevant). Let's remove the leftover from the previous test case to
make it clear that duplicate flag processors results only in a
warning.

Note that duplicate flag processors would have resulted in a failure
(not just a warning) until ea1c2eb7abd3 (extensions: catch uisetup and
extsetup failures and don't let them break hg, 2017-06-06). I remember
expressing my concern about ending up with half-loaded extensions. It
would be pretty unfortunate to have double-encoded revlog content
enter a repo, so maybe we should reconsider?

Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D201

  $ hg init repo
  $ cd repo

  $ touch foo
  $ hg ci -Am 'add foo'
  adding foo

  $ hg up -C null
  0 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved

this should be stored as a delta against rev 0

  $ echo foo bar baz > foo
  $ hg ci -Am 'add foo again'
  adding foo
  created new head

  $ hg debugindex foo
     rev    offset  length  ..... linkrev nodeid       p1           p2 (re)
       0         0       0  .....       0 b80de5d13875 000000000000 000000000000 (re)
       1         0      13  .....       1 0376abec49b8 000000000000 000000000000 (re)

  $ cd ..