view tests/test-push-checkheads-pruned-B7.t @ 40176:41263df08109

wireprotov2: change how revisions are specified to changesetdata Right now, we have a handful of arguments for specifying the revisions whose data should be returned. Defining how all these arguments interact when various combinations are present is difficult. This commit establishes a new, generic mechanism for specifying revisions. Instead of a hodgepodge of arguments defining things, we have a list of dicts that specify revision selectors. The final set of revisions is a union of all these selectors. We implement support for specifying revisions based on: * An explicit list of changeset revisions * An explicit list of changeset revisions plus ancestry depth * A DAG range between changeset roots and heads If you squint hard enough, this problem has already been solved by revsets. But I'm reluctant to expose revsets to the wire protocol because that would require servers to implement a revset parser. Plus there are security and performance implications: the set of revision selectors needs to be narrowly and specifically tailored for what is appropriate to be executing on a server. Perhaps there would be a way for us to express the "parse tree" of a revset query, for example. I'm not sure. We can explore this space another time. For now, the new mechanism should bring sufficient flexibility while remaining relatively simple. The selector "types" are prefixed with "changeset" because I plan to add manifest and file-flavored selectors as well. This will enable us to e.g. select file revisions based on a range of changeset revisions. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4979
author Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com>
date Mon, 08 Oct 2018 18:17:12 -0700
parents 4441705b7111
children 34a46d48d24e
line wrap: on
line source

====================================
Testing head checking code: Case B-7
====================================

Mercurial checks for the introduction of new heads on push. Evolution comes
into play to detect if existing branches on the server are being replaced by
some of the new one we push.

This case is part of a series of tests checking this behavior.

Category B: simple case involving pruned changesets
TestCase 7: single changesets, pruned then superseeded (on an existing changeset)

.. old-state:
..
.. * 1 changeset branch
..
.. new-state:
..
.. * old branch is rewritten onto the common set,
.. * the new version is then pruned.
..
.. expected-result:
..
.. * push allowed
..
.. graph-summary:
..
..   A ø⇠⊗ A'
.. B ◔ | |
..    \|/
..     ●

  $ . $TESTDIR/testlib/push-checkheads-util.sh

Test setup
----------

  $ mkdir B7
  $ cd B7
  $ setuprepos
  creating basic server and client repo
  updating to branch default
  2 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ cd client
  $ hg up 0
  0 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ mkcommit B0
  created new head
  $ mkcommit A1
  $ hg up 'desc(B0)'
  0 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ hg debugobsolete `getid "desc(A0)"` `getid "desc(A1)"`
  obsoleted 1 changesets
  $ hg debugobsolete --record-parents `getid "desc(A1)"`
  obsoleted 1 changesets
  $ hg log -G --hidden
  x  ba93660aff8d (draft): A1
  |
  @  74ff5441d343 (draft): B0
  |
  | x  8aaa48160adc (draft): A0
  |/
  o  1e4be0697311 (public): root
  

Actual testing
--------------

  $ hg push
  pushing to $TESTTMP/B7/server
  searching for changes
  adding changesets
  adding manifests
  adding file changes
  added 1 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files (+1 heads)
  2 new obsolescence markers
  obsoleted 1 changesets

  $ cd ../..