view tests/test-exchange-obsmarkers-case-B7.t @ 37295:45b39c69fae0

wireproto: separate commands tables for version 1 and 2 commands

We can't easily reuse existing command handlers for version 2
commands because the response types will be different. e.g. many
commands return nodes encoded as hex. Our new wire protocol is
binary safe, so we'll wish to encode nodes as binary.

We /could/ teach each command handler to look at the protocol
handler and change behavior based on the version in use. However,
this would make logic a bit unwieldy over time and would make
it harder to design a unified protocol handler interface. I think
it's better to create a clean break between version 1 and version 2
of commands on the server.

What I imagine happening is we will have separate @wireprotocommand
functions for each protocol generation. Those functions will parse the
request, dispatch to a common function to process it, then generate
the response in its own, transport-specific manner.

This commit establishes a separate table for tracking version 1
commands from version 2 commands. The HTTP server pieces have been
updated to use this new table.

Most commands are marked as both version 1 and version 2, so there is
little practical impact to this change.

A side-effect of this change is we now rely on transport registration
in wireprototypes.TRANSPORTS and certain properties of the protocol
interface. So a test had to be updated to conform.

Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D2982

============================================
Testing obsolescence markers push: Cases B.7
============================================

Mercurial pushes obsolescences markers relevant to the "pushed-set", the set of
all changesets that requested to be "in sync" after the push (even if they are
already on both side).

This test belongs to a series of tests checking such set is properly computed
and applied. This does not tests "obsmarkers" discovery capabilities.

Category B: pruning case
TestCase 7: Prune on non-targeted common changeset

B.7 Prune above non-targeted common changeset
=============================================

.. (very similar to B1, but the prune changeset is unknown on remote)
..
.. {{{
..     ⊗ B
..     |
..     ◕ A
..     |
..     ● O
.. }}}
..
.. Marker exist from:
..
..  * B (prune)
..
.. Command runs:
..
..  * hg push -r O
..
.. Expected exclude:
..
..  * B (prune)

Setup
-----

  $ . $TESTDIR/testlib/exchange-obsmarker-util.sh

Initial

  $ setuprepos B.7
  creating test repo for test case B.7
  - pulldest
  - main
  - pushdest
  cd into `main` and proceed with env setup
  $ cd main
  $ mkcommit A
  $ hg push -q ../pushdest
  $ hg push -q ../pulldest
  $ mkcommit B
  $ hg prune -qd '0 0' .
  $ hg log -G --hidden
  x  f6fbb35d8ac9 (draft): B
  |
  @  f5bc6836db60 (draft): A
  |
  o  a9bdc8b26820 (public): O
  
  $ inspect_obsmarkers
  obsstore content
  ================
  f6fbb35d8ac958bbe70035e4c789c18471cdc0af 0 {f5bc6836db60e308a17ba08bf050154ba9c4fad7} (Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000) {'user': 'test'}
  $ cd ..
  $ cd ..

Actual Test
-------------------------------------

  $ dotest B.7 O
  ## Running testcase B.7
  # testing echange of "O" (a9bdc8b26820)
  ## initial state
  # obstore: main
  f6fbb35d8ac958bbe70035e4c789c18471cdc0af 0 {f5bc6836db60e308a17ba08bf050154ba9c4fad7} (Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000) {'user': 'test'}
  # obstore: pushdest
  # obstore: pulldest
  ## pushing "O" from main to pushdest
  pushing to pushdest
  searching for changes
  no changes found
  ## post push state
  # obstore: main
  f6fbb35d8ac958bbe70035e4c789c18471cdc0af 0 {f5bc6836db60e308a17ba08bf050154ba9c4fad7} (Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000) {'user': 'test'}
  # obstore: pushdest
  # obstore: pulldest
  ## pulling "a9bdc8b26820" from main into pulldest
  pulling from main
  no changes found
  ## post pull state
  # obstore: main
  f6fbb35d8ac958bbe70035e4c789c18471cdc0af 0 {f5bc6836db60e308a17ba08bf050154ba9c4fad7} (Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000) {'user': 'test'}
  # obstore: pushdest
  # obstore: pulldest