view tests/test-merge-remove.t @ 37295:45b39c69fae0

wireproto: separate commands tables for version 1 and 2 commands

We can't easily reuse existing command handlers for version 2
commands because the response types will be different. e.g. many
commands return nodes encoded as hex. Our new wire protocol is
binary safe, so we'll wish to encode nodes as binary.

We /could/ teach each command handler to look at the protocol
handler and change behavior based on the version in use. However,
this would make logic a bit unwieldy over time and would make
it harder to design a unified protocol handler interface. I think
it's better to create a clean break between version 1 and version 2
of commands on the server.

What I imagine happening is we will have separate @wireprotocommand
functions for each protocol generation. Those functions will parse the
request, dispatch to a common function to process it, then generate
the response in its own, transport-specific manner.

This commit establishes a separate table for tracking version 1
commands from version 2 commands. The HTTP server pieces have been
updated to use this new table.

Most commands are marked as both version 1 and version 2, so there is
little practical impact to this change.

A side-effect of this change is we now rely on transport registration
in wireprototypes.TRANSPORTS and certain properties of the protocol
interface. So a test had to be updated to conform.

Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D2982

  $ hg init

  $ echo foo > foo
  $ echo bar > bar
  $ hg ci -qAm 'add foo bar'

  $ echo foo2 >> foo
  $ echo bleh > bar
  $ hg ci -m 'change foo bar'

  $ hg up -qC 0
  $ hg mv foo foo1
  $ echo foo1 > foo1
  $ hg cat foo >> foo1
  $ hg ci -m 'mv foo foo1'
  created new head

  $ hg merge
  merging foo1 and foo to foo1
  1 files updated, 1 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (branch merge, don't forget to commit)

  $ hg debugstate --nodates
  m   0         -2 unset               bar
  m   0         -2 unset               foo1
  copy: foo -> foo1

  $ hg st -q
  M bar
  M foo1


Removing foo1 and bar:

  $ cp foo1 F
  $ cp bar B
  $ hg rm -f foo1 bar

  $ hg debugstate --nodates
  r   0         -1 set                 bar
  r   0         -1 set                 foo1
  copy: foo -> foo1

  $ hg st -qC
  R bar
  R foo1


Re-adding foo1 and bar:

  $ cp F foo1
  $ cp B bar
  $ hg add -v foo1 bar
  adding bar
  adding foo1

  $ hg debugstate --nodates
  n   0         -2 unset               bar
  n   0         -2 unset               foo1
  copy: foo -> foo1

  $ hg st -qC
  M bar
  M foo1
    foo


Reverting foo1 and bar:

  $ hg revert -vr . foo1 bar
  saving current version of bar as bar.orig
  reverting bar
  saving current version of foo1 as foo1.orig
  reverting foo1

  $ hg debugstate --nodates
  n   0         -2 unset               bar
  n   0         -2 unset               foo1
  copy: foo -> foo1

  $ hg st -qC
  M bar
  M foo1
    foo

  $ hg diff

Merge should not overwrite local file that is untracked after remove

  $ rm *
  $ hg up -qC
  $ hg rm bar
  $ hg ci -m 'remove bar'
  $ echo 'memories of buried pirate treasure' > bar
  $ hg merge
  bar: untracked file differs
  abort: untracked files in working directory differ from files in requested revision
  [255]
  $ cat bar
  memories of buried pirate treasure

Those who use force will lose

  $ hg merge -f
  other [merge rev] changed bar which local [working copy] deleted
  use (c)hanged version, leave (d)eleted, or leave (u)nresolved? u
  merging foo1 and foo to foo1
  0 files updated, 1 files merged, 0 files removed, 1 files unresolved
  use 'hg resolve' to retry unresolved file merges or 'hg merge --abort' to abandon
  [1]
  $ cat bar
  bleh
  $ hg st
  M bar
  M foo1