view tests/test-simple-update.t @ 37295:45b39c69fae0

wireproto: separate commands tables for version 1 and 2 commands We can't easily reuse existing command handlers for version 2 commands because the response types will be different. e.g. many commands return nodes encoded as hex. Our new wire protocol is binary safe, so we'll wish to encode nodes as binary. We /could/ teach each command handler to look at the protocol handler and change behavior based on the version in use. However, this would make logic a bit unwieldy over time and would make it harder to design a unified protocol handler interface. I think it's better to create a clean break between version 1 and version 2 of commands on the server. What I imagine happening is we will have separate @wireprotocommand functions for each protocol generation. Those functions will parse the request, dispatch to a common function to process it, then generate the response in its own, transport-specific manner. This commit establishes a separate table for tracking version 1 commands from version 2 commands. The HTTP server pieces have been updated to use this new table. Most commands are marked as both version 1 and version 2, so there is little practical impact to this change. A side-effect of this change is we now rely on transport registration in wireprototypes.TRANSPORTS and certain properties of the protocol interface. So a test had to be updated to conform. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D2982
author Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com>
date Wed, 28 Mar 2018 10:40:41 -0700
parents eb586ed5d8ce
children eb9835014d20
line wrap: on
line source

  $ hg init test
  $ cd test
  $ echo foo>foo
  $ hg addremove
  adding foo
  $ hg commit -m "1"

  $ hg verify
  checking changesets
  checking manifests
  crosschecking files in changesets and manifests
  checking files
  1 files, 1 changesets, 1 total revisions

  $ hg clone . ../branch
  updating to branch default
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ cd ../branch
  $ hg co
  0 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ echo bar>>foo
  $ hg commit -m "2"

  $ cd ../test

  $ hg pull ../branch
  pulling from ../branch
  searching for changes
  adding changesets
  adding manifests
  adding file changes
  added 1 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files
  new changesets 30aff43faee1
  (run 'hg update' to get a working copy)

  $ hg verify
  checking changesets
  checking manifests
  crosschecking files in changesets and manifests
  checking files
  1 files, 2 changesets, 2 total revisions

  $ hg co
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved

  $ cat foo
  foo
  bar

  $ hg manifest --debug
  6f4310b00b9a147241b071a60c28a650827fb03d 644   foo

update to rev 0 with a date

  $ hg upd -d foo 0
  abort: you can't specify a revision and a date
  [255]

  $ cd ..

update with worker processes

#if no-windows

  $ cat <<EOF > forceworker.py
  > from mercurial import extensions, worker
  > def nocost(orig, ui, costperop, nops):
  >     return worker._numworkers(ui) > 1
  > def uisetup(ui):
  >     extensions.wrapfunction(worker, 'worthwhile', nocost)
  > EOF

  $ hg init worker
  $ cd worker
  $ cat <<EOF >> .hg/hgrc
  > [extensions]
  > forceworker = $TESTTMP/forceworker.py
  > [worker]
  > numcpus = 4
  > EOF
  $ for i in `$PYTHON $TESTDIR/seq.py 1 100`; do
  >   echo $i > $i
  > done
  $ hg ci -qAm 'add 100 files'

  $ hg update null
  0 files updated, 0 files merged, 100 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ hg update -v | grep 100
  getting 100
  100 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved

  $ cd ..

#endif