Mercurial > hg
view tests/test-stack.t @ 37295:45b39c69fae0
wireproto: separate commands tables for version 1 and 2 commands
We can't easily reuse existing command handlers for version 2
commands because the response types will be different. e.g. many
commands return nodes encoded as hex. Our new wire protocol is
binary safe, so we'll wish to encode nodes as binary.
We /could/ teach each command handler to look at the protocol
handler and change behavior based on the version in use. However,
this would make logic a bit unwieldy over time and would make
it harder to design a unified protocol handler interface. I think
it's better to create a clean break between version 1 and version 2
of commands on the server.
What I imagine happening is we will have separate @wireprotocommand
functions for each protocol generation. Those functions will parse the
request, dispatch to a common function to process it, then generate
the response in its own, transport-specific manner.
This commit establishes a separate table for tracking version 1
commands from version 2 commands. The HTTP server pieces have been
updated to use this new table.
Most commands are marked as both version 1 and version 2, so there is
little practical impact to this change.
A side-effect of this change is we now rely on transport registration
in wireprototypes.TRANSPORTS and certain properties of the protocol
interface. So a test had to be updated to conform.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D2982
author | Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> |
---|---|
date | Wed, 28 Mar 2018 10:40:41 -0700 |
parents | 68fcc5503ec5 |
children |
line wrap: on
line source
This test test the low-level definition of stack, agnostic from all formatting Initial setup $ cat << EOF >> $HGRCPATH > [ui] > logtemplate = {rev} {branch} {phase} {desc|firstline}\n > [extensions] > rebase= > [experimental] > evolution=createmarkers,exchange,allowunstable > EOF $ hg init main $ cd main $ hg branch other marked working directory as branch other (branches are permanent and global, did you want a bookmark?) $ echo aaa > aaa $ hg add aaa $ hg commit -m c_a $ echo aaa > bbb $ hg add bbb $ hg commit -m c_b $ hg branch foo marked working directory as branch foo $ echo aaa > ccc $ hg add ccc $ hg commit -m c_c $ echo aaa > ddd $ hg add ddd $ hg commit -m c_d $ echo aaa > eee $ hg add eee $ hg commit -m c_e $ echo aaa > fff $ hg add fff $ hg commit -m c_f $ hg log -G @ 5 foo draft c_f | o 4 foo draft c_e | o 3 foo draft c_d | o 2 foo draft c_c | o 1 other draft c_b | o 0 other draft c_a Check that stack doesn't include public changesets -------------------------------------------------- $ hg up other 0 files updated, 0 files merged, 4 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ hg log -G -r "stack()" @ 1 other draft c_b | o 0 other draft c_a $ hg phase --public 'branch("other")' $ hg log -G -r "stack()" $ hg up foo 4 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved Simple test ----------- 'stack()' list all changeset in the branch $ hg branch foo $ hg log -G -r "stack()" @ 5 foo draft c_f | o 4 foo draft c_e | o 3 foo draft c_d | o 2 foo draft c_c | ~ Case with some of the branch unstable ------------------------------------ $ hg up 3 0 files updated, 0 files merged, 2 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ echo bbb > ddd $ hg commit --amend 2 new orphan changesets $ hg log -G @ 6 foo draft c_d | | * 5 foo draft c_f | | | * 4 foo draft c_e | | | x 3 foo draft c_d |/ o 2 foo draft c_c | o 1 other public c_b | o 0 other public c_a $ hg log -G -r "stack()" @ 6 foo draft c_d | ~ $ hg up -r "desc(c_e)" 2 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ hg log -G -r "stack()" @ 4 foo draft c_e | x 3 foo draft c_d | ~ $ hg up -r "desc(c_d)" 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ hg log -G -r "stack()" @ 6 foo draft c_d | ~ Case with multiple topological heads ------------------------------------ Make things linear again $ hg rebase -s 'desc(c_e)' -d 'desc(c_d) - obsolete()' rebasing 4:4f2a69f6d380 "c_e" rebasing 5:913c298d8b0a "c_f" $ hg log -G o 8 foo draft c_f | o 7 foo draft c_e | @ 6 foo draft c_d | o 2 foo draft c_c | o 1 other public c_b | o 0 other public c_a Create the second branch $ hg up 'desc(c_d)' 0 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ echo aaa > ggg $ hg add ggg $ hg commit -m c_g created new head $ echo aaa > hhh $ hg add hhh $ hg commit -m c_h $ hg log -G @ 10 foo draft c_h | o 9 foo draft c_g | | o 8 foo draft c_f | | | o 7 foo draft c_e |/ o 6 foo draft c_d | o 2 foo draft c_c | o 1 other public c_b | o 0 other public c_a Test output $ hg log -G -r "stack(10)" @ 10 foo draft c_h | o 9 foo draft c_g | ~ $ hg log -G -r "stack(8)" o 8 foo draft c_f | o 7 foo draft c_e | ~ $ hg log -G -r "stack(head())" @ 10 foo draft c_h | o 9 foo draft c_g | ~ o 8 foo draft c_f | o 7 foo draft c_e | ~ Check the stack order $ hg log -r "first(stack())" 9 foo draft c_g $ hg log -r "first(stack(10))" 9 foo draft c_g $ hg log -r "first(stack(8))" 7 foo draft c_e $ hg log -r "first(stack(head()))" 7 foo draft c_e Case with multiple heads with unstability involved -------------------------------------------------- We amend the message to make sure the display base pick the right changeset $ hg up 'desc(c_d)' 0 files updated, 0 files merged, 2 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ echo ccc > ddd $ hg commit --amend -m 'c_D' 4 new orphan changesets $ hg rebase -d . -s 'desc(c_g)' rebasing 9:2ebb6e48ab8a "c_g" rebasing 10:634f38e27a1d "c_h" $ hg log -G o 13 foo draft c_h | o 12 foo draft c_g | @ 11 foo draft c_D | | * 8 foo draft c_f | | | * 7 foo draft c_e | | | x 6 foo draft c_d |/ o 2 foo draft c_c | o 1 other public c_b | o 0 other public c_a We should improve stack definition to also show 12 and 13 here $ hg log -G -r "stack()" @ 11 foo draft c_D | ~