Mercurial > hg
view tests/test-bundle-vs-outgoing.t @ 40417:49c7b701fdc2 stable
phase: add an archived phase
This phase allows for hidden changesets in the "user space". It differs from
the "internal" phase which is intended for internal by-product only. There
have been discussions at the 4.8 sprint to use such phase to speedup cleanup
after history rewriting operation.
Shipping it in the same release as the 'internal-phase' groups the associated
`requires` entry. The important bit is to have support for this phase in the
earliest version of mercurial possible. Adding the UI to manipulate this new
phase later seems fine.
The current plan for archived usage and user interface are as follow. On a
repository with internal-phase on and evolution off:
* history rewriting command set rewritten changeset in the archived phase.
(This mean updating the cleanupnodes method).
* keep `hg unbundle .hg/strip-backup/X.hg` as a way to restore changeset for
now
(backup bundle need to contains phase data)
* [maybe] add a `hg strip --soft` advance flag
(a light way to expose the feature without getting in the way of a better
UI)
Mercurial 4.8 freeze is too close to get the above in by then.
We don't introduce a new repository `requirement` as we reuse the one
introduced with the 'archived' phase during the 4.8 cycle.
author | Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> |
---|---|
date | Wed, 17 Oct 2018 14:47:01 +0200 |
parents | eb586ed5d8ce |
children |
line wrap: on
line source
this structure seems to tickle a bug in bundle's search for changesets, so first we have to recreate it o 8 | | o 7 | | | o 6 |/| o | 5 | | o | 4 | | | o 3 | | | o 2 |/ o 1 | o 0 $ mkrev() > { > revno=$1 > echo "rev $revno" > echo "rev $revno" > foo.txt > hg -q ci -m"rev $revno" > } setup test repo1 $ hg init repo1 $ cd repo1 $ echo "rev 0" > foo.txt $ hg ci -Am"rev 0" adding foo.txt $ mkrev 1 rev 1 first branch $ mkrev 2 rev 2 $ mkrev 3 rev 3 back to rev 1 to create second branch $ hg up -r1 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ mkrev 4 rev 4 $ mkrev 5 rev 5 merge first branch to second branch $ hg up -C -r5 0 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ HGMERGE=internal:local hg merge 0 files updated, 1 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved (branch merge, don't forget to commit) $ echo "merge rev 5, rev 3" > foo.txt $ hg ci -m"merge first branch to second branch" one more commit following the merge $ mkrev 7 rev 7 back to "second branch" to make another head $ hg up -r5 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ mkrev 8 rev 8 the story so far $ hg log -G --template "{rev}\n" @ 8 | | o 7 | | | o 6 |/| o | 5 | | o | 4 | | | o 3 | | | o 2 |/ o 1 | o 0 check that "hg outgoing" really does the right thing sanity check of outgoing: expect revs 4 5 6 7 8 $ hg clone -r3 . ../repo2 adding changesets adding manifests adding file changes added 4 changesets with 4 changes to 1 files new changesets 6ae4cca4e39a:478f191e53f8 updating to branch default 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved this should (and does) report 5 outgoing revisions: 4 5 6 7 8 $ hg outgoing --template "{rev}\n" ../repo2 comparing with ../repo2 searching for changes 4 5 6 7 8 test bundle (destination repo): expect 5 revisions this should bundle the same 5 revisions that outgoing reported, but it actually bundles 7 $ hg bundle foo.bundle ../repo2 searching for changes 5 changesets found test bundle (base revision): expect 5 revisions this should (and does) give exactly the same result as bundle with a destination repo... i.e. it's wrong too $ hg bundle --base 3 foo.bundle 5 changesets found $ cd ..