view tests/test-pull-update.t @ 43913:4b7d5d10c45d

exchange: ensure all outgoing subrepo references are present before pushing

We've run into occasional problems with people committing a repo, and then
amending or rebasing in the subrepo.  That makes it so that the revision in the
parent can't be checked out, and the problem gets propagated on push.  Mercurial
already tries to defend against this sort of dangling reference by pushing *all*
subrepo revisions first.  This reuses the checks that trigger warnings in
`hg verify` to bail on the push unless using `--force`.

I thought about putting this on the server side, but at that point, all of the
data has been transferred, only to bail out.  Additionally, SCM Manager hosts
subrepos in a location that isn't nested in the parent, so normal subrepo code
would complain that the subrepo is missing when run on the server.

Because the push command pushes subrepos before calling this exchange code, a
subrepo will be pushed before the parent is verified.  Not great, but no
dangling references are exchanged, so it solves the problem.  This code isn't in
the loop that pushes the subrepos because:

  1) the list of outgoing revisions is needed to limit the scope of the check
  2) the loop only accesses the current revision, and therefore can miss
     subrepos that were dropped in previous commits
  3) this code is called when pushing a subrepo, so the protection is recursive

I'm not sure if there's a cheap check for the list of files in the outgoing
bundle.  If there is, that would provide a fast path to bypass this check for
people not using subrepos (or if no subrepo changes were made).  There's
probably also room for verifying other references like tags.  But since that
doesn't break checkouts, it's much less of a problem.

Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D7616

  $ hg init t
  $ cd t
  $ echo 1 > foo
  $ hg ci -Am m
  adding foo

  $ cd ..
  $ hg clone t tt
  updating to branch default
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ cd tt
  $ echo 1.1 > foo
  $ hg ci -Am m

  $ cd ../t
  $ echo 1.2 > foo
  $ hg ci -Am m

Should respect config to disable dirty update
  $ hg co -qC 0
  $ echo 2 > foo
  $ hg --config commands.update.check=abort pull -u ../tt
  pulling from ../tt
  searching for changes
  adding changesets
  adding manifests
  adding file changes
  added 1 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files (+1 heads)
  new changesets 107cefe13e42
  1 local changesets published
  abort: uncommitted changes
  [255]
  $ hg --config extensions.strip= strip --no-backup tip
  $ hg co -qC tip

Should not update to the other topological branch:

  $ hg pull -u ../tt
  pulling from ../tt
  searching for changes
  adding changesets
  adding manifests
  adding file changes
  added 1 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files (+1 heads)
  new changesets 107cefe13e42
  0 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  updated to "800c91d5bfc1: m"
  1 other heads for branch "default"

  $ cd ../tt

Should not update to the other branch:

  $ hg pull -u ../t
  pulling from ../t
  searching for changes
  adding changesets
  adding manifests
  adding file changes
  added 1 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files (+1 heads)
  new changesets 800c91d5bfc1
  1 local changesets published
  0 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  updated to "107cefe13e42: m"
  1 other heads for branch "default"

  $ HGMERGE=true hg merge
  merging foo
  0 files updated, 1 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (branch merge, don't forget to commit)
  $ hg ci -mm

  $ cd ../t

Should work:

  $ hg pull -u ../tt
  pulling from ../tt
  searching for changes
  adding changesets
  adding manifests
  adding file changes
  added 1 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files (-1 heads)
  new changesets 483b76ad4309
  1 local changesets published
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved

Similarity between "hg update" and "hg pull -u" in handling bookmark
====================================================================

Test that updating activates the bookmark, which matches with the
explicit destination of the update.

  $ echo 4 >> foo
  $ hg commit -m "#4"
  $ hg bookmark active-after-pull
  $ cd ../tt

(1) activating by --rev BOOKMARK

  $ hg bookmark -f active-before-pull
  $ hg bookmarks
   * active-before-pull        3:483b76ad4309

  $ hg pull -u -r active-after-pull
  pulling from $TESTTMP/t
  searching for changes
  adding changesets
  adding manifests
  adding file changes
  adding remote bookmark active-after-pull
  added 1 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files
  new changesets f815b3da6163
  1 local changesets published
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (activating bookmark active-after-pull)

  $ hg parents -q
  4:f815b3da6163
  $ hg bookmarks
   * active-after-pull         4:f815b3da6163
     active-before-pull        3:483b76ad4309

(discard pulled changes)

  $ hg update -q 483b76ad4309
  $ hg rollback -q

(2) activating by URL#BOOKMARK

  $ hg bookmark -f active-before-pull
  $ hg bookmarks
   * active-before-pull        3:483b76ad4309

  $ hg pull -u $TESTTMP/t#active-after-pull
  pulling from $TESTTMP/t
  searching for changes
  adding changesets
  adding manifests
  adding file changes
  adding remote bookmark active-after-pull
  added 1 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files
  new changesets f815b3da6163
  1 local changesets published
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (activating bookmark active-after-pull)

  $ hg parents -q
  4:f815b3da6163
  $ hg bookmarks
   * active-after-pull         4:f815b3da6163
     active-before-pull        3:483b76ad4309

(discard pulled changes)

  $ hg update -q 483b76ad4309
  $ hg rollback -q

Test that updating deactivates current active bookmark, if the
destination of the update is explicitly specified, and it doesn't
match with the name of any existing bookmarks.

  $ cd ../t
  $ hg bookmark -d active-after-pull
  $ hg branch bar -q
  $ hg commit -m "#5 (bar #1)"
  $ cd ../tt

(1) deactivating by --rev REV

  $ hg bookmark -f active-before-pull
  $ hg bookmarks
   * active-before-pull        3:483b76ad4309

  $ hg pull -u -r b5e4babfaaa7
  pulling from $TESTTMP/t
  searching for changes
  adding changesets
  adding manifests
  adding file changes
  added 2 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files
  new changesets f815b3da6163:b5e4babfaaa7
  1 local changesets published
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (leaving bookmark active-before-pull)

  $ hg parents -q
  5:b5e4babfaaa7
  $ hg bookmarks
     active-before-pull        3:483b76ad4309

(discard pulled changes)

  $ hg update -q 483b76ad4309
  $ hg rollback -q

(2) deactivating by --branch BRANCH

  $ hg bookmark -f active-before-pull
  $ hg bookmarks
   * active-before-pull        3:483b76ad4309

  $ hg pull -u -b bar
  pulling from $TESTTMP/t
  searching for changes
  adding changesets
  adding manifests
  adding file changes
  added 2 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files
  new changesets f815b3da6163:b5e4babfaaa7
  1 local changesets published
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (leaving bookmark active-before-pull)

  $ hg parents -q
  5:b5e4babfaaa7
  $ hg bookmarks
     active-before-pull        3:483b76ad4309

(discard pulled changes)

  $ hg update -q 483b76ad4309
  $ hg rollback -q

(3) deactivating by URL#ANOTHER-BRANCH

  $ hg bookmark -f active-before-pull
  $ hg bookmarks
   * active-before-pull        3:483b76ad4309

  $ hg pull -u $TESTTMP/t#bar
  pulling from $TESTTMP/t
  searching for changes
  adding changesets
  adding manifests
  adding file changes
  added 2 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files
  new changesets f815b3da6163:b5e4babfaaa7
  1 local changesets published
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (leaving bookmark active-before-pull)

  $ hg parents -q
  5:b5e4babfaaa7
  $ hg bookmarks
     active-before-pull        3:483b76ad4309

  $ cd ..