tests/test-issue842.t
author Jun Wu <quark@fb.com>
Mon, 26 Jun 2017 13:13:51 -0700
changeset 33331 4bae3c117b57
parent 26420 2fc86d92c4a9
child 49621 55c6ebd11cb9
permissions -rw-r--r--
scmutil: make cleanupnodes delete divergent bookmarks cleanupnodes takes care of bookmark movement, and bookmark movement could cause bookmark divergent resolution as a side effect. This patch adds such bookmark divergent resolution logic so future rebase migration will be easier. The revset is carefully written to be equivalent to what rebase does today. Although I think it might make sense to remove divergent bookmarks more aggressively, for example: F book@1 | E book@2 | | D book | | | C |/ B book@3 | A When rebase -s C -d E, "book@1" will be removed, "book@3" will be kept, and the end result is: D book | C | F | E book@2 (?) | B book@3 | A The question is should we keep book@2? The current logic keeps it. If we choose not to (makes some sense to me), the "deleterevs" revset could be simplified to "newnode % oldnode". For now, I just make it compatible with the existing behavior. If we want to make the "deleterevs" revset simpler, we can always do it in the future.

https://bz.mercurial-scm.org/842

  $ hg init
  $ echo foo > a
  $ hg ci -Ama
  adding a

  $ hg up -r0000
  0 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved

  $ echo bar > a

Should issue new head warning:

  $ hg ci -Amb
  adding a
  created new head

  $ hg up -r0000
  0 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved

  $ echo stuffy > a

Should not issue new head warning:

  $ hg ci -q -Amc

  $ hg up -r0000
  0 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved

  $ echo crap > a
  $ hg branch testing
  marked working directory as branch testing
  (branches are permanent and global, did you want a bookmark?)

Should not issue warning:

  $ hg ci -q -Amd