tests/test-merge6.t
author Jun Wu <quark@fb.com>
Mon, 26 Jun 2017 13:13:51 -0700
changeset 33331 4bae3c117b57
parent 33286 2428e8ec0793
child 33721 24849d53697d
permissions -rw-r--r--
scmutil: make cleanupnodes delete divergent bookmarks cleanupnodes takes care of bookmark movement, and bookmark movement could cause bookmark divergent resolution as a side effect. This patch adds such bookmark divergent resolution logic so future rebase migration will be easier. The revset is carefully written to be equivalent to what rebase does today. Although I think it might make sense to remove divergent bookmarks more aggressively, for example: F book@1 | E book@2 | | D book | | | C |/ B book@3 | A When rebase -s C -d E, "book@1" will be removed, "book@3" will be kept, and the end result is: D book | C | F | E book@2 (?) | B book@3 | A The question is should we keep book@2? The current logic keeps it. If we choose not to (makes some sense to me), the "deleterevs" revset could be simplified to "newnode % oldnode". For now, I just make it compatible with the existing behavior. If we want to make the "deleterevs" revset simpler, we can always do it in the future.

  $ cat <<EOF > merge
  > import sys, os
  > print "merging for", os.path.basename(sys.argv[1])
  > EOF
  $ HGMERGE="$PYTHON ../merge"; export HGMERGE

  $ hg init A1
  $ cd A1
  $ echo This is file foo1 > foo
  $ echo This is file bar1 > bar
  $ hg add foo bar
  $ hg commit -m "commit text"

  $ cd ..
  $ hg clone A1 B1
  updating to branch default
  2 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved

  $ cd A1
  $ rm bar
  $ hg remove bar
  $ hg commit -m "commit test"

  $ cd ../B1
  $ echo This is file foo22 > foo
  $ hg commit -m "commit test"

  $ cd ..
  $ hg clone A1 A2
  updating to branch default
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ hg clone B1 B2
  updating to branch default
  2 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved

  $ cd A1
  $ hg pull ../B1
  pulling from ../B1
  searching for changes
  adding changesets
  adding manifests
  adding file changes
  added 1 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files (+1 heads)
  (run 'hg heads' to see heads, 'hg merge' to merge)
  $ hg merge
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (branch merge, don't forget to commit)
  $ hg commit -m "commit test"
bar should remain deleted.
  $ hg manifest --debug
  f9b0e817f6a48de3564c6b2957687c5e7297c5a0 644   foo

  $ cd ../B2
  $ hg pull ../A2
  pulling from ../A2
  searching for changes
  adding changesets
  adding manifests
  adding file changes
  added 1 changesets with 0 changes to 0 files (+1 heads)
  (run 'hg heads' to see heads, 'hg merge' to merge)
  $ hg merge
  0 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (branch merge, don't forget to commit)
  $ hg commit -m "commit test"
bar should remain deleted.
  $ hg manifest --debug
  f9b0e817f6a48de3564c6b2957687c5e7297c5a0 644   foo

  $ cd ..