tests/test-symlink-os-yes-fs-no.py.out
author Jun Wu <quark@fb.com>
Mon, 26 Jun 2017 13:13:51 -0700
changeset 33331 4bae3c117b57
parent 11769 ca6cebd8734e
child 34661 eb586ed5d8ce
permissions -rw-r--r--
scmutil: make cleanupnodes delete divergent bookmarks cleanupnodes takes care of bookmark movement, and bookmark movement could cause bookmark divergent resolution as a side effect. This patch adds such bookmark divergent resolution logic so future rebase migration will be easier. The revset is carefully written to be equivalent to what rebase does today. Although I think it might make sense to remove divergent bookmarks more aggressively, for example: F book@1 | E book@2 | | D book | | | C |/ B book@3 | A When rebase -s C -d E, "book@1" will be removed, "book@3" will be kept, and the end result is: D book | C | F | E book@2 (?) | B book@3 | A The question is should we keep book@2? The current logic keeps it. If we choose not to (makes some sense to me), the "deleterevs" revset could be simplified to "newnode % oldnode". For now, I just make it compatible with the existing behavior. If we want to make the "deleterevs" revset simpler, we can always do it in the future.

requesting all changes
adding changesets
adding manifests
adding file changes
added 1 changesets with 4 changes to 4 files
updating to branch default
4 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
requesting all changes
adding changesets
adding manifests
adding file changes
added 1 changesets with 4 changes to 4 files
updating to branch default
4 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved