Mercurial > hg
view tests/test-rename-merge1.t @ 47072:4c041c71ec01
revlog: introduce an explicit tracking of what the revlog is about
Since the dawn of time, people have been forced to rely to lossy introspection
of the index filename to determine what the purpose and role of the revlog they
encounter is. This is hacky, error prone, inflexible, abstraction-leaky,
<insert-your-own-complaints-here>.
In f63299ee7e4d Raphaël introduced a new attribute to track this information:
`revlog_kind`. However it is initialized in an odd place and various instances
end up not having it set. In addition is only tracking some of the information
we end up having to introspect in various pieces of code.
So we add a new attribute that holds more data and is more strictly enforced.
This work is done in collaboration with Raphaël.
The `revlog_kind` one will be removed/adapted in the next changeset. We expect
to be able to clean up various existing piece of code and to simplify coming
work around the newer revlog format.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D10352
author | Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> |
---|---|
date | Tue, 06 Apr 2021 05:20:24 +0200 |
parents | 69429972ff1f |
children | 38941a28406a |
line wrap: on
line source
$ hg init $ echo "[merge]" >> .hg/hgrc $ echo "followcopies = 1" >> .hg/hgrc $ echo foo > a $ echo foo > a2 $ hg add a a2 $ hg ci -m "start" $ hg mv a b $ hg mv a2 b2 $ hg ci -m "rename" $ hg co 0 2 files updated, 0 files merged, 2 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ echo blahblah > a $ echo blahblah > a2 $ hg mv a2 c2 $ hg ci -m "modify" created new head $ hg merge -y --debug unmatched files in local: c2 unmatched files in other: b b2 all copies found (* = to merge, ! = divergent, % = renamed and deleted): on local side: src: 'a2' -> dst: 'c2' ! on remote side: src: 'a' -> dst: 'b' * src: 'a2' -> dst: 'b2' ! checking for directory renames resolving manifests branchmerge: True, force: False, partial: False ancestor: af1939970a1c, local: 044f8520aeeb+, remote: 85c198ef2f6c note: possible conflict - a2 was renamed multiple times to: b2 c2 b2: remote created -> g getting b2 preserving a for resolve of b removing a b: remote moved from a -> m (premerge) picked tool ':merge' for b (binary False symlink False changedelete False) merging a and b to b my b@044f8520aeeb+ other b@85c198ef2f6c ancestor a@af1939970a1c premerge successful 1 files updated, 1 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved (branch merge, don't forget to commit) $ hg status -AC M b a M b2 R a C c2 $ cat b blahblah $ hg ci -m "merge" $ hg debugindex b rev linkrev nodeid p1 p2 0 1 57eacc201a7f 000000000000 000000000000 1 3 4727ba907962 000000000000 57eacc201a7f $ hg debugrename b b renamed from a:dd03b83622e78778b403775d0d074b9ac7387a66 This used to trigger a "divergent renames" warning, despite no renames $ hg cp b b3 $ hg cp b b4 $ hg ci -A -m 'copy b twice' $ hg up '.^' 0 files updated, 0 files merged, 2 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ hg up 2 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ hg rm b3 b4 $ hg ci -m 'clean up a bit of our mess' We'd rather not warn on divergent renames done in the same changeset (issue2113) $ hg cp b b3 $ hg mv b b4 $ hg ci -A -m 'divergent renames in same changeset' $ hg up '.^' 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 2 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ hg up 2 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved Check for issue2642 $ hg init t $ cd t $ echo c0 > f1 $ hg ci -Aqm0 $ hg up null -q $ echo c1 > f1 # backport $ hg ci -Aqm1 $ hg mv f1 f2 $ hg ci -qm2 $ hg up 0 -q $ hg merge 1 -q --tool internal:local $ hg ci -qm3 $ hg merge 2 merging f1 and f2 to f2 0 files updated, 1 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved (branch merge, don't forget to commit) $ cat f2 c0 $ cd .. Check for issue2089 $ hg init repo2089 $ cd repo2089 $ echo c0 > f1 $ hg ci -Aqm0 $ hg up null -q $ echo c1 > f1 $ hg ci -Aqm1 $ hg up 0 -q $ hg merge 1 -q --tool internal:local $ echo c2 > f1 $ hg ci -qm2 $ hg up 1 -q $ hg mv f1 f2 $ hg ci -Aqm3 $ hg up 2 -q $ hg merge 3 merging f1 and f2 to f2 0 files updated, 1 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved (branch merge, don't forget to commit) $ cat f2 c2 $ cd .. Check for issue3074 $ hg init repo3074 $ cd repo3074 $ echo foo > file $ hg add file $ hg commit -m "added file" $ hg mv file newfile $ hg commit -m "renamed file" $ hg update 0 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ hg rm file $ hg commit -m "deleted file" created new head $ hg merge --debug unmatched files in other: newfile all copies found (* = to merge, ! = divergent, % = renamed and deleted): on remote side: src: 'file' -> dst: 'newfile' % checking for directory renames resolving manifests branchmerge: True, force: False, partial: False ancestor: 19d7f95df299, local: 0084274f6b67+, remote: 5d32493049f0 note: possible conflict - file was deleted and renamed to: newfile newfile: remote created -> g getting newfile 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved (branch merge, don't forget to commit) $ hg status M newfile $ cd .. Create x and y, then modify y and rename x to z on one side of merge, and modify x and rename y to z on the other side. $ hg init conflicting-target $ cd conflicting-target $ echo x > x $ echo y > y $ hg ci -Aqm 'add x and y' $ hg mv x z $ echo foo >> y $ hg ci -qm 'modify y, rename x to z' $ hg co -q 0 $ hg mv y z $ echo foo >> x $ hg ci -qm 'modify x, rename y to z' # We should probably tell the user about the conflicting rename sources. # Depending on which side they pick, we should take that rename and get # the changes to the source from the other side. The unchanged file should # remain. $ hg merge --debug 1 -t :merge3 all copies found (* = to merge, ! = divergent, % = renamed and deleted): on local side: src: 'y' -> dst: 'z' * on remote side: src: 'x' -> dst: 'z' * checking for directory renames resolving manifests branchmerge: True, force: False, partial: False ancestor: 5151c134577e, local: 07fcbc9a74ed+, remote: f21419739508 starting 4 threads for background file closing (?) preserving z for resolve of z z: both renamed from y -> m (premerge) picked tool ':merge3' for z (binary False symlink False changedelete False) merging z my z@07fcbc9a74ed+ other z@f21419739508 ancestor y@5151c134577e premerge successful 0 files updated, 1 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved (branch merge, don't forget to commit) $ ls x z $ cat x x foo # 'z' should have had the added 'foo' line $ cat z x