view tests/test-revert-interactive.t @ 38486:4c0683655599

namespaces: let namespaces override singlenode() definition

Some namespaces have multiple nodes per name (meaning that their
namemap() returns multiple nodes). One such namespace is the "topics"
namespace (from the evolve repo). We also have our own internal
namespace at Google (for review units) that has multiple nodes per
name. These namespaces may not want to use the default "pick highest
revnum" resolution that we currently use when resolving a name to a
single node. As an example, they may decide that `hg co <name>` should
check out a commit that's last in some sense even if an earlier commit
had just been amended and thus had a higher revnum [1]. This patch
gives the namespace the option to continue to return multiple nodes
and to override how the best node is picked. Allowing namespaces to
override that may also be useful as an optimization (it may be cheaper
for the namespace to find just that node).

I have been arguing (in D3715) for using all the nodes returned from
namemap() when resolving the symbol to a revset, so e.g. `hg log -r
stable` would resolve to *all* nodes on stable, not just the one with
the highest revnum (except that I don't actually think we should
change it for the branch namespace because of BC). Most people seem
opposed to that. If we decide not to do it, I think we can deprecate
the namemap() function in favor of the new singlenode() (I find it
weird to have namespaces, like the branch namespace, where namemap()
isn't nodemap()'s inverse). I therefore think this patch makes sense
regardless of what we decide on that issue.


 [1] Actually, even the branch namespace would have wanted to override
     singlenode() if it had supported multiple nodes. That's because
     closes branch heads are mostly ignored, so "hg co default" will
     not check out the highest-revnum node if that's a closed head.

Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D3852

Revert interactive tests
1 add and commit file f
2 add commit file folder1/g
3 add and commit file folder2/h
4 add and commit file folder1/i
5 commit change to file f
6 commit changes to files folder1/g folder2/h
7 commit changes to files folder1/g folder2/h
8 revert interactive to commit id 2 (line 3 above), check that folder1/i is removed and
9 make workdir match 7
10 run the same test than 8 from within folder1 and check same expectations

  $ cat <<EOF >> $HGRCPATH
  > [ui]
  > interactive = true
  > [extensions]
  > record =
  > purge = 
  > EOF


  $ mkdir -p a/folder1 a/folder2
  $ cd a
  $ hg init
  >>> open('f', 'wb').write(b"1\n2\n3\n4\n5\n") and None
  $ hg add f ; hg commit -m "adding f"
  $ cat f > folder1/g ; hg add folder1/g ; hg commit -m "adding folder1/g"
  $ cat f > folder2/h ; hg add folder2/h ; hg commit -m "adding folder2/h"
  $ cat f > folder1/i ; hg add folder1/i ; hg commit -m "adding folder1/i"
  >>> open('f', 'wb').write(b"a\n1\n2\n3\n4\n5\nb\n") and None
  $ hg commit -m "modifying f"
  >>> open('folder1/g', 'wb').write(b"c\n1\n2\n3\n4\n5\nd\n") and None
  $ hg commit -m "modifying folder1/g"
  >>> open('folder2/h', 'wb').write(b"e\n1\n2\n3\n4\n5\nf\n") and None
  $ hg commit -m "modifying folder2/h"
  $ hg tip
  changeset:   6:59dd6e4ab63a
  tag:         tip
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
  summary:     modifying folder2/h
  
  $ hg revert -i -r 2 --all -- << EOF
  > y
  > y
  > y
  > y
  > y
  > ?
  > y
  > n
  > n
  > EOF
  reverting f
  reverting folder1/g
  removing folder1/i
  reverting folder2/h
  remove added file folder1/i (Yn)? y
  diff --git a/f b/f
  2 hunks, 2 lines changed
  examine changes to 'f'? [Ynesfdaq?] y
  
  @@ -1,6 +1,5 @@
  -a
   1
   2
   3
   4
   5
  apply change 1/6 to 'f'? [Ynesfdaq?] y
  
  @@ -2,6 +1,5 @@
   1
   2
   3
   4
   5
  -b
  apply change 2/6 to 'f'? [Ynesfdaq?] y
  
  diff --git a/folder1/g b/folder1/g
  2 hunks, 2 lines changed
  examine changes to 'folder1/g'? [Ynesfdaq?] y
  
  @@ -1,6 +1,5 @@
  -c
   1
   2
   3
   4
   5
  apply change 3/6 to 'folder1/g'? [Ynesfdaq?] ?
  
  y - yes, apply this change
  n - no, skip this change
  e - edit this change manually
  s - skip remaining changes to this file
  f - apply remaining changes to this file
  d - done, skip remaining changes and files
  a - apply all changes to all remaining files
  q - quit, applying no changes
  ? - ? (display help)
  apply change 3/6 to 'folder1/g'? [Ynesfdaq?] y
  
  @@ -2,6 +1,5 @@
   1
   2
   3
   4
   5
  -d
  apply change 4/6 to 'folder1/g'? [Ynesfdaq?] n
  
  diff --git a/folder2/h b/folder2/h
  2 hunks, 2 lines changed
  examine changes to 'folder2/h'? [Ynesfdaq?] n
  
  $ cat f
  1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  $ cat folder1/g
  1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  d
  $ cat folder2/h
  e
  1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  f

Test that --interactive lift the need for --all

  $ echo q | hg revert -i -r 2
  reverting folder1/g
  reverting folder2/h
  diff --git a/folder1/g b/folder1/g
  1 hunks, 1 lines changed
  examine changes to 'folder1/g'? [Ynesfdaq?] q
  
  abort: user quit
  [255]
  $ ls folder1/
  g

Test that a noop revert doesn't do an unnecessary backup
  $ (echo y; echo n) | hg revert -i -r 2 folder1/g
  diff --git a/folder1/g b/folder1/g
  1 hunks, 1 lines changed
  examine changes to 'folder1/g'? [Ynesfdaq?] y
  
  @@ -3,4 +3,3 @@
   3
   4
   5
  -d
  apply this change to 'folder1/g'? [Ynesfdaq?] n
  
  $ ls folder1/
  g

Test --no-backup
  $ (echo y; echo y) | hg revert -i -C -r 2 folder1/g
  diff --git a/folder1/g b/folder1/g
  1 hunks, 1 lines changed
  examine changes to 'folder1/g'? [Ynesfdaq?] y
  
  @@ -3,4 +3,3 @@
   3
   4
   5
  -d
  apply this change to 'folder1/g'? [Ynesfdaq?] y
  
  $ ls folder1/
  g
  >>> open('folder1/g', 'wb').write(b"1\n2\n3\n4\n5\nd\n") and None


  $ hg update -C 6
  3 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ hg revert -i -r 2 --all -- << EOF
  > n
  > y
  > y
  > y
  > y
  > y
  > n
  > n
  > EOF
  reverting f
  reverting folder1/g
  removing folder1/i
  reverting folder2/h
  remove added file folder1/i (Yn)? n
  diff --git a/f b/f
  2 hunks, 2 lines changed
  examine changes to 'f'? [Ynesfdaq?] y
  
  @@ -1,6 +1,5 @@
  -a
   1
   2
   3
   4
   5
  apply change 1/6 to 'f'? [Ynesfdaq?] y
  
  @@ -2,6 +1,5 @@
   1
   2
   3
   4
   5
  -b
  apply change 2/6 to 'f'? [Ynesfdaq?] y
  
  diff --git a/folder1/g b/folder1/g
  2 hunks, 2 lines changed
  examine changes to 'folder1/g'? [Ynesfdaq?] y
  
  @@ -1,6 +1,5 @@
  -c
   1
   2
   3
   4
   5
  apply change 3/6 to 'folder1/g'? [Ynesfdaq?] y
  
  @@ -2,6 +1,5 @@
   1
   2
   3
   4
   5
  -d
  apply change 4/6 to 'folder1/g'? [Ynesfdaq?] n
  
  diff --git a/folder2/h b/folder2/h
  2 hunks, 2 lines changed
  examine changes to 'folder2/h'? [Ynesfdaq?] n
  
  $ cat f
  1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  $ cat folder1/g
  1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  d
  $ cat folder2/h
  e
  1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  f
  $ hg st
  M f
  M folder1/g
  $ hg revert --interactive f << EOF
  > y
  > ?
  > y
  > n
  > n
  > EOF
  diff --git a/f b/f
  2 hunks, 2 lines changed
  examine changes to 'f'? [Ynesfdaq?] y
  
  @@ -1,6 +1,5 @@
  -a
   1
   2
   3
   4
   5
  discard change 1/2 to 'f'? [Ynesfdaq?] ?
  
  y - yes, discard this change
  n - no, skip this change
  e - edit this change manually
  s - skip remaining changes to this file
  f - discard remaining changes to this file
  d - done, skip remaining changes and files
  a - discard all changes to all remaining files
  q - quit, discarding no changes
  ? - ? (display help)
  discard change 1/2 to 'f'? [Ynesfdaq?] y
  
  @@ -2,6 +1,5 @@
   1
   2
   3
   4
   5
  -b
  discard change 2/2 to 'f'? [Ynesfdaq?] n
  
  $ hg st
  M f
  M folder1/g
  ? f.orig
  $ cat f
  a
  1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  $ cat f.orig
  1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  $ rm f.orig
  $ hg update -C .
  2 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved

Check editing files newly added by a revert

1) Create a dummy editor changing 1 to 42
  $ cat > $TESTTMP/editor.sh << '__EOF__'
  > cat "$1"  | sed "s/1/42/g"  > tt
  > mv tt  "$1"
  > __EOF__

2) Add k
  $ printf "1\n" > k
  $ hg add k
  $ hg commit -m "add k"

3) Use interactive revert with editing (replacing +1 with +42):
  $ printf "0\n2\n" > k
  $ HGEDITOR="\"sh\" \"${TESTTMP}/editor.sh\"" hg revert -i  <<EOF
  > y
  > e
  > EOF
  reverting k
  diff --git a/k b/k
  1 hunks, 2 lines changed
  examine changes to 'k'? [Ynesfdaq?] y
  
  @@ -1,1 +1,2 @@
  -1
  +0
  +2
  discard this change to 'k'? [Ynesfdaq?] e
  
  $ cat k
  42

  $ hg update -C .
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ hg purge
  $ touch newfile
  $ hg add newfile
  $ hg status
  A newfile
  $ hg revert -i <<EOF
  > n
  > EOF
  forgetting newfile
  forget added file newfile (Yn)? n
  $ hg status
  A newfile
  $ hg revert -i <<EOF
  > y
  > EOF
  forgetting newfile
  forget added file newfile (Yn)? y
  $ hg status
  ? newfile

When a line without EOL is selected during "revert -i" (issue5651)

  $ hg init $TESTTMP/revert-i-eol
  $ cd $TESTTMP/revert-i-eol
  $ echo 0 > a
  $ hg ci -qAm 0
  $ printf 1 >> a
  $ hg ci -qAm 1
  $ cat a
  0
  1 (no-eol)

  $ hg revert -ir'.^' <<EOF
  > y
  > y
  > EOF
  reverting a
  diff --git a/a b/a
  1 hunks, 1 lines changed
  examine changes to 'a'? [Ynesfdaq?] y
  
  @@ -1,2 +1,1 @@
   0
  -1
  \ No newline at end of file
  apply this change to 'a'? [Ynesfdaq?] y
  
  $ cat a
  0

When specified pattern does not exist, we should exit early (issue5789).

  $ hg files
  a
  $ hg rev b
  b: no such file in rev b40d1912accf
  $ hg rev -i b
  b: no such file in rev b40d1912accf

  $ cd ..