view tests/test-record.t @ 33766:4c706037adef

wireproto: overhaul iterating batcher code (API) The remote batching code is difficult to read. Let's improve it. As part of the refactor, the future returned by method calls on batchiter() instances is now populated. However, you still need to consume the results() generator for the future to be set. But at least now we can stuff the future somewhere and not have to worry about aligning method call order with result order since you can use a future to hold the result. Also as part of the change, we now verify that @batchable generators yield exactly 2 values. In other words, we enforce their API. The non-iter batcher has been unused since b6e71f8af5b8. And to my surprise we had no explicit unit test coverage of it! test-batching.py has been overhauled to use the iterating batcher. Since the iterating batcher doesn't allow non-batchable method calls nor local calls, tests have been updated to reflect reality. The iterating batcher has been used for multiple releases apparently without major issue. So this shouldn't cause alarm. .. api:: @peer.batchable functions must now yield exactly 2 values Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D319
author Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com>
date Wed, 09 Aug 2017 23:29:30 -0700
parents 7074589cf22a
children da07367d683b
line wrap: on
line source

Set up a repo

  $ cat <<EOF >> $HGRCPATH
  > [ui]
  > interactive = true
  > [extensions]
  > record =
  > EOF

  $ hg init a
  $ cd a

Record help

  $ hg record -h
  hg record [OPTION]... [FILE]...
  
  interactively select changes to commit
  
      If a list of files is omitted, all changes reported by 'hg status' will be
      candidates for recording.
  
      See 'hg help dates' for a list of formats valid for -d/--date.
  
      If using the text interface (see 'hg help config'), you will be prompted
      for whether to record changes to each modified file, and for files with
      multiple changes, for each change to use. For each query, the following
      responses are possible:
  
        y - record this change
        n - skip this change
        e - edit this change manually
  
        s - skip remaining changes to this file
        f - record remaining changes to this file
  
        d - done, skip remaining changes and files
        a - record all changes to all remaining files
        q - quit, recording no changes
  
        ? - display help
  
      This command is not available when committing a merge.
  
  (use 'hg help -e record' to show help for the record extension)
  
  options ([+] can be repeated):
  
   -A --addremove           mark new/missing files as added/removed before
                            committing
      --close-branch        mark a branch head as closed
      --amend               amend the parent of the working directory
   -s --secret              use the secret phase for committing
   -e --edit                invoke editor on commit messages
   -I --include PATTERN [+] include names matching the given patterns
   -X --exclude PATTERN [+] exclude names matching the given patterns
   -m --message TEXT        use text as commit message
   -l --logfile FILE        read commit message from file
   -d --date DATE           record the specified date as commit date
   -u --user USER           record the specified user as committer
   -S --subrepos            recurse into subrepositories
   -w --ignore-all-space    ignore white space when comparing lines
   -b --ignore-space-change ignore changes in the amount of white space
   -B --ignore-blank-lines  ignore changes whose lines are all blank
  
  (some details hidden, use --verbose to show complete help)

Select no files

  $ touch empty-rw
  $ hg add empty-rw

  $ hg record empty-rw<<EOF
  > n
  > EOF
  diff --git a/empty-rw b/empty-rw
  new file mode 100644
  examine changes to 'empty-rw'? [Ynesfdaq?] n
  
  no changes to record
  [1]

  $ hg tip -p
  changeset:   -1:000000000000
  tag:         tip
  user:        
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000