view tests/test-simple-update.t @ 33766:4c706037adef

wireproto: overhaul iterating batcher code (API) The remote batching code is difficult to read. Let's improve it. As part of the refactor, the future returned by method calls on batchiter() instances is now populated. However, you still need to consume the results() generator for the future to be set. But at least now we can stuff the future somewhere and not have to worry about aligning method call order with result order since you can use a future to hold the result. Also as part of the change, we now verify that @batchable generators yield exactly 2 values. In other words, we enforce their API. The non-iter batcher has been unused since b6e71f8af5b8. And to my surprise we had no explicit unit test coverage of it! test-batching.py has been overhauled to use the iterating batcher. Since the iterating batcher doesn't allow non-batchable method calls nor local calls, tests have been updated to reflect reality. The iterating batcher has been used for multiple releases apparently without major issue. So this shouldn't cause alarm. .. api:: @peer.batchable functions must now yield exactly 2 values Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D319
author Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com>
date Wed, 09 Aug 2017 23:29:30 -0700
parents 75be14993fda
children eb586ed5d8ce
line wrap: on
line source

  $ hg init test
  $ cd test
  $ echo foo>foo
  $ hg addremove
  adding foo
  $ hg commit -m "1"

  $ hg verify
  checking changesets
  checking manifests
  crosschecking files in changesets and manifests
  checking files
  1 files, 1 changesets, 1 total revisions

  $ hg clone . ../branch
  updating to branch default
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ cd ../branch
  $ hg co
  0 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ echo bar>>foo
  $ hg commit -m "2"

  $ cd ../test

  $ hg pull ../branch
  pulling from ../branch
  searching for changes
  adding changesets
  adding manifests
  adding file changes
  added 1 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files
  (run 'hg update' to get a working copy)

  $ hg verify
  checking changesets
  checking manifests
  crosschecking files in changesets and manifests
  checking files
  1 files, 2 changesets, 2 total revisions

  $ hg co
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved

  $ cat foo
  foo
  bar

  $ hg manifest --debug
  6f4310b00b9a147241b071a60c28a650827fb03d 644   foo

update to rev 0 with a date

  $ hg upd -d foo 0
  abort: you can't specify a revision and a date
  [255]

  $ cd ..

update with worker processes

#if no-windows

  $ cat <<EOF > forceworker.py
  > from mercurial import extensions, worker
  > def nocost(orig, ui, costperop, nops):
  >     return worker._numworkers(ui) > 1
  > def uisetup(ui):
  >     extensions.wrapfunction(worker, 'worthwhile', nocost)
  > EOF

  $ hg init worker
  $ cd worker
  $ cat <<EOF >> .hg/hgrc
  > [extensions]
  > forceworker = $TESTTMP/forceworker.py
  > [worker]
  > numcpus = 4
  > EOF
  $ for i in `$PYTHON $TESTDIR/seq.py 1 100`; do
  >   echo $i > $i
  > done
  $ hg ci -qAm 'add 100 files'

  $ hg update null
  0 files updated, 0 files merged, 100 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ hg update -v | grep 100
  getting 100
  100 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved

  $ cd ..

#endif