view tests/test-contrib-testparseutil.t @ 45584:4c8a93ec6908

merge: store commitinfo if these is a dc or cd conflict

delete-changed or changed-delete conflicts can either be resolved by mergetool,
if some tool is passed and using or by user choose something on prompt or user
doing some `hg revert` after choosing the file to remain conflicted.

If the user decides to keep the changed side, on commit we just reuse the parent
filenode. This is mostly fine unless we are in a distributed environment and
people are doing criss-cross merges.

Since, we don't have recursive merges or any other way of describing the end
result of the merge was an explicit choice and it should be differentiated from
it's ancestors, merge algo during criss-cross merges fails to take in account
the explicit choice made by user and end up with a what-can-be-said-wrong-merge.

The solution which we are trying to fix this is by creating a filenode on commit
instead of reusing the parent filenode. This helps differentiate between
pre-merged filenode and post-merge filenode and kind of tells about the choice
user made.

To implement creating new filenode functionality, we store info about these
files in mergestate so that we can read them on commit and force create a new
filenode.

Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D8988

  $ testparseutil="$TESTDIR"/../contrib/testparseutil.py

Internal test by doctest

  $ "$PYTHON" -m doctest "$testparseutil"

Tests for embedded python script

Typical cases

  $ "$PYTHON" "$testparseutil" -v pyembedded <<NO_CHECK_EOF
  >   >>> for f in [1, 2, 3]:
  >   ...     foo = 1
  >   >>> foo = 2
  >   $ echo "doctest is terminated by command, empty line, or comment"
  >   >>> foo = 31
  >   expected output of doctest fragment
  >   >>> foo = 32
  >   
  >   >>> foo = 33
  > 
  >   >>> foo = 34
  > comment
  >   >>> foo = 35
  > 
  >   $ "\$PYTHON" <<EOF
  >   > foo = 4
  >   > 
  >   > EOF
  >   $ cat > foo.py <<EOF
  >   > foo = 5
  >   > EOF
  >   $ cat >> foo.py <<EOF
  >   > foo = 6 # appended
  >   > EOF
  > 
  > NO_CHECK_EOF limit mark makes parsing ignore corresponded fragment
  > (this is useful to use bad code intentionally)
  > 
  >   $ "\$PYTHON" <<NO_CHECK_EOF
  >   > foo = 7 # this should be ignored at detection
  >   > NO_CHECK_EOF
  >   $ cat > foo.py <<NO_CHECK_EOF
  >   > foo = 8 # this should be ignored at detection
  >   > NO_CHECK_EOF
  > 
  > doctest fragment ended by EOF
  > 
  >   >>> foo = 9
  > NO_CHECK_EOF
  <stdin>:1: <anonymous> starts
    |for f in [1, 2, 3]:
    |    foo = 1
    |foo = 2
  <stdin>:4: <anonymous> ends
  <stdin>:5: <anonymous> starts
    |foo = 31
    |
    |foo = 32
    |
    |foo = 33
  <stdin>:10: <anonymous> ends
  <stdin>:11: <anonymous> starts
    |foo = 34
  <stdin>:12: <anonymous> ends
  <stdin>:13: <anonymous> starts
    |foo = 35
  <stdin>:14: <anonymous> ends
  <stdin>:16: <anonymous> starts
    |foo = 4
    |
  <stdin>:18: <anonymous> ends
  <stdin>:20: foo.py starts
    |foo = 5
  <stdin>:21: foo.py ends
  <stdin>:23: foo.py starts
    |foo = 6 # appended
  <stdin>:24: foo.py ends
  <stdin>:38: <anonymous> starts
    |foo = 9
  <stdin>:39: <anonymous> ends

Invalid test script

(similar test for shell script and hgrc configuration is omitted,
because this tests common base class of them)

  $ "$PYTHON" "$testparseutil" -v pyembedded <<NO_CHECK_EOF > detected
  >   $ "\$PYTHON" <<EOF
  >   > foo = 1
  > 
  >   $ "\$PYTHON" <<EOF
  >   > foo = 2
  >   $ cat > bar.py <<EOF
  >   > bar = 2 # this fragment will be detected as expected
  >   > EOF
  > 
  >   $ cat > foo.py <<EOF
  >   > foo = 3
  > NO_CHECK_EOF
  <stdin>:3: unexpected line for "heredoc python invocation"
  <stdin>:6: unexpected line for "heredoc python invocation"
  <stdin>:11: unexpected end of file for "heredoc .py file"
  [1]
  $ cat detected
  <stdin>:7: bar.py starts
    |bar = 2 # this fragment will be detected as expected
  <stdin>:8: bar.py ends

Tests for embedded shell script

  $ "$PYTHON" "$testparseutil" -v shembedded <<NO_CHECK_EOF
  >   $ cat > foo.sh <<EOF
  >   > foo = 1
  >   > 
  >   > foo = 2
  >   > EOF
  >   $ cat >> foo.sh <<EOF
  >   > foo = 3 # appended
  >   > EOF
  > 
  > NO_CHECK_EOF limit mark makes parsing ignore corresponded fragment
  > (this is useful to use bad code intentionally)
  > 
  >   $ cat > foo.sh <<NO_CHECK_EOF
  >   > # this should be ignored at detection
  >   > foo = 4
  >   > NO_CHECK_EOF
  > 
  > NO_CHECK_EOF
  <stdin>:2: foo.sh starts
    |foo = 1
    |
    |foo = 2
  <stdin>:5: foo.sh ends
  <stdin>:7: foo.sh starts
    |foo = 3 # appended
  <stdin>:8: foo.sh ends

Tests for embedded hgrc configuration

  $ "$PYTHON" "$testparseutil" -v hgrcembedded <<NO_CHECK_EOF
  >   $ cat > .hg/hgrc <<EOF
  >   > [ui]
  >   > verbose = true
  >   > 
  >   > # end of local configuration
  >   > EOF
  > 
  >   $ cat > \$HGRCPATH <<EOF
  >   > [extensions]
  >   > rebase =
  >   > # end of global configuration
  >   > EOF
  > 
  >   $ cat >> \$HGRCPATH <<EOF
  >   > # appended
  >   > [extensions]
  >   > rebase =!
  >   > EOF
  > 
  > NO_CHECK_EOF limit mark makes parsing ignore corresponded fragment
  > (this is useful to use bad code intentionally)
  > 
  >   $ cat > .hg/hgrc <<NO_CHECK_EOF
  >   > # this local configuration should be ignored at detection
  >   > [ui]
  >   > username = foo bar
  >   > NO_CHECK_EOF
  > 
  >   $ cat > \$HGRCPATH <<NO_CHECK_EOF
  >   > # this global configuration should be ignored at detection
  >   > [extensions]
  >   > foobar =
  >   > NO_CHECK_EOF
  > NO_CHECK_EOF
  <stdin>:2: .hg/hgrc starts
    |[ui]
    |verbose = true
    |
    |# end of local configuration
  <stdin>:6: .hg/hgrc ends
  <stdin>:9: $HGRCPATH starts
    |[extensions]
    |rebase =
    |# end of global configuration
  <stdin>:12: $HGRCPATH ends
  <stdin>:15: $HGRCPATH starts
    |# appended
    |[extensions]
    |rebase =!
  <stdin>:18: $HGRCPATH ends