view tests/test-pull-pull-corruption.t @ 45584:4c8a93ec6908

merge: store commitinfo if these is a dc or cd conflict

delete-changed or changed-delete conflicts can either be resolved by mergetool,
if some tool is passed and using or by user choose something on prompt or user
doing some `hg revert` after choosing the file to remain conflicted.

If the user decides to keep the changed side, on commit we just reuse the parent
filenode. This is mostly fine unless we are in a distributed environment and
people are doing criss-cross merges.

Since, we don't have recursive merges or any other way of describing the end
result of the merge was an explicit choice and it should be differentiated from
it's ancestors, merge algo during criss-cross merges fails to take in account
the explicit choice made by user and end up with a what-can-be-said-wrong-merge.

The solution which we are trying to fix this is by creating a filenode on commit
instead of reusing the parent filenode. This helps differentiate between
pre-merged filenode and post-merge filenode and kind of tells about the choice
user made.

To implement creating new filenode functionality, we store info about these
files in mergestate so that we can read them on commit and force create a new
filenode.

Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D8988

Corrupt an hg repo with two pulls.
create one repo with a long history

  $ hg init source1
  $ cd source1
  $ touch foo
  $ hg add foo
  $ for i in 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10; do
  >     echo $i >> foo
  >     hg ci -m $i
  > done
  $ cd ..

create one repo with a shorter history

  $ hg clone -r 0 source1 source2
  adding changesets
  adding manifests
  adding file changes
  added 1 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files
  new changesets 495a0ec48aaf
  updating to branch default
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ cd source2
  $ echo a >> foo
  $ hg ci -m a
  $ cd ..

create a third repo to pull both other repos into it

  $ hg init corrupted
  $ cd corrupted

use a hook to make the second pull start while the first one is still running

  $ echo '[hooks]' >> .hg/hgrc
  $ echo 'prechangegroup = sleep 5' >> .hg/hgrc

start a pull...

  $ hg pull ../source1 > pull.out 2>&1 &

... and start another pull before the first one has finished

  $ sleep 1
  $ hg pull ../source2 2>/dev/null
  pulling from ../source2
  searching for changes
  adding changesets
  adding manifests
  adding file changes
  added 1 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files (+1 heads)
  new changesets ca3c05af513e
  (run 'hg heads' to see heads, 'hg merge' to merge)
  $ cat pull.out
  pulling from ../source1
  requesting all changes
  adding changesets
  adding manifests
  adding file changes
  added 10 changesets with 10 changes to 1 files
  new changesets 495a0ec48aaf:1e7b6c812ca8
  (run 'hg update' to get a working copy)

see the result

  $ wait
  $ hg verify
  checking changesets
  checking manifests
  crosschecking files in changesets and manifests
  checking files
  checked 11 changesets with 11 changes to 1 files

  $ cd ..