help: branch names primarily denote the tipmost unclosed branch head
Was the behavior correct and the description wrong so it should be updated as
in this patch? Or should the code work as the documentation says?
Both ways could make some sense ... but none of them are obvious in all cases.
One place where it currently cause problems is when the current revision has
another branch head that is closer to tip but closed. 'hg rebase' refuses to
rebase to that as it only see the tip-most unclosed branch head which is the
current revision.
/me kind of likes named branches, but no so much how branch closing works ...
Mercurial's default format for showing changes between two versions of
a file is compatible with the unified format of GNU diff, which can be
used by GNU patch and many other standard tools.
While this standard format is often enough, it does not encode the
following information:
- executable status and other permission bits
- copy or rename information
- changes in binary files
- creation or deletion of empty files
Mercurial also supports the extended diff format from the git VCS
which addresses these limitations. The git diff format is not produced
by default because a few widespread tools still do not understand this
format.
This means that when generating diffs from a Mercurial repository
(e.g. with :hg:`export`), you should be careful about things like file
copies and renames or other things mentioned above, because when
applying a standard diff to a different repository, this extra
information is lost. Mercurial's internal operations (like push and
pull) are not affected by this, because they use an internal binary
format for communicating changes.
To make Mercurial produce the git extended diff format, use the --git
option available for many commands, or set 'git = True' in the [diff]
section of your configuration file. You do not need to set this option
when importing diffs in this format or using them in the mq extension.