largefiles: remove meaningless code path for "hg pull --rebase"
This patch removes "--rebase" specific code path for "hg pull" in
"overridepull", because previous patch makes it meaningless: now,
"rebase.rebase" ("orig" invocation in this patch) can
update/commit largefiles safely without "repo._isrebasing = True".
As a side effect of removing "rebase.rebase" invocation in
"overridepull", this patch removes "nothing to rebase ..." message in
"test-largefiles.t", which is shown only when rebase extension is
enabled AFTER largefiles:
before this patch:
1. "dispatch" invokes "pullrebase" of rebase as "hg pull" at
first, because rebase wraps "hg pull" later
2. "pullrebase" invokes "overridepull" of largefiles as "orig",
even though rebase assumes that "orig" is "pull" of commands
3. "overridepull" executes "pull" and "rebase" directly
3.1 "pull" pulls changesets and creates new head "X"
3.2 "rebase" rebases current working parent "Y" on "X"
4. "overridepull" returns to "pullrebase"
5. "pullrebase" tries to rebase, but there is nothing to be done,
because "Y" is already rebased on "X". then, it shows "nothing
to rebase ..."
after this patch:
1. "dispatch" invokes "pullrebase" of rebase as "hg pull"
2. "pullrebase" invokes "overridepull" of largefiles as "orig"
3. "overridepull" executes "pull" as "orig"
4. "overridepull" returns to "pullrebase"
5. revision "Y" is not yet rebased, so "pullrebase" doesn't shows
"nothing to rebase ..."
As another side effect of removing "rebase.rebase" invocation, this
patch fixes
issue3861, which occurs only when rebase extension is
enabled BEFORE largefiles:
before this patch:
1. "dispatch" invokes "overridepull" of largefiles at first,
because largefiles wrap "hg pull" later
2. "overridepull" executes "pull" and "rebase" explicitly
2.1 "pull" pulls changesets and creates new head "X"
2.2 "rebase" rebases current working parent, but fails because
no revision is checked out in
issue3861 case
3. "overridepull" returns to "dispatch" with exit code 1 returned
from "rebase" at (2.2)
4. "hg pull" terminates with exit code 1 unexpectedly
after this patch:
1. "dispatch" invokes "overridepull" of largefiles at first
2. "overridepull" invokes "pullrebase" of rebase as "orig"
3. "pullrebase" invokes "pull" as "orig"
4. "pullrebase" invokes "rebase", and it fails
5. "pullrebase" returns to "overridepull" with exit code 0
(because "pullrebase" ignores result of "pull" and "rebase")
6. "overridepull" returns to "dispatch" with exit code 0 returned
from "rebase" at (5)
7. "hg pull" terminates with exit code 0
#require icasefs
################################
test for branch merging
################################
test for rename awareness of case-folding collision check:
(1) colliding file is one renamed from collided file:
this is also case for issue3370.
$ hg init branch_merge_renaming
$ cd branch_merge_renaming
$ echo a > a
$ hg add a
$ echo b > b
$ hg add b
$ hg commit -m '#0'
$ hg tag -l A
$ hg rename a tmp
$ hg rename tmp A
$ hg commit -m '#1'
$ hg tag -l B
$ hg update -q 0
$ touch x
$ hg add x
$ hg commit -m '#2'
created new head
$ hg tag -l C
$ hg merge -q
$ hg status -A
M A
R a
C b
C x
$ hg update -q --clean 1
$ hg merge -q
$ hg status -A
M x
C A
C b
$ hg commit -m '(D)'
$ hg tag -l D
additional test for issue3452:
| this assumes the history below.
|
| (A) -- (C) -- (E) -------
| \ \ \
| \ \ \
| (B) -- (D) -- (F) -- (G)
|
| A: add file 'a'
| B: rename from 'a' to 'A'
| C: add 'x' (or operation other than modification of 'a')
| D: merge C into B
| E: modify 'a'
| F: modify 'A'
| G: merge E into F
|
| issue3452 occurs when (B) is recorded before (C)
$ hg update -q --clean C
$ echo "modify 'a' at (E)" > a
$ echo "modify 'b' at (E)" > b
$ hg commit -m '(E)'
created new head
$ hg tag -l E
$ hg update -q --clean D
$ echo "modify 'A' at (F)" > A
$ hg commit -m '(F)'
$ hg tag -l F
$ hg merge -q --tool internal:other E
$ hg status -A
M A
a
M b
C x
$ cat A
modify 'a' at (E)
test also the case that (B) is recorded after (C), to prevent
regression by changes in the future.
to avoid unexpected (successful) behavior by filelog unification,
target file is not 'a'/'A' but 'b'/'B' in this case.
$ hg update -q --clean A
$ hg rename b tmp
$ hg rename tmp B
$ hg commit -m '(B1)'
created new head
$ hg tag -l B1
$ hg merge -q C
$ hg status -A
M x
C B
C a
$ hg commit -m '(D1)'
$ hg tag -l D1
$ echo "modify 'B' at (F1)" > B
$ hg commit -m '(F1)'
$ hg tag -l F1
$ hg merge -q --tool internal:other E
$ hg status -A
M B
b
M a
C x
$ cat B
modify 'b' at (E)
$ cd ..
(2) colliding file is not related to collided file
$ hg init branch_merge_collding
$ cd branch_merge_collding
$ echo a > a
$ hg add a
$ hg commit -m '#0'
$ hg remove a
$ hg commit -m '#1'
$ echo A > A
$ hg add A
$ hg commit -m '#2'
$ hg update --clean 0
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ echo x > x
$ hg add x
$ hg commit -m '#3'
created new head
$ echo 'modified at #4' > a
$ hg commit -m '#4'
$ hg merge
abort: case-folding collision between a and A
[255]
$ hg parents --template '{rev}\n'
4
$ hg status -A
C a
C x
$ cat a
modified at #4
$ hg update --clean 2
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 2 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ hg merge
abort: case-folding collision between a and A
[255]
$ hg parents --template '{rev}\n'
2
$ hg status -A
C A
$ cat A
A
test for deletion awareness of case-folding collision check (issue3648):
revision '#3' doesn't change 'a', so 'a' should be recognized as
safely removed in merging between #2 and #3.
$ hg update --clean 3
2 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ hg merge 2
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
(branch merge, don't forget to commit)
$ hg status -A
M A
R a
C x
$ hg update --clean 2
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ hg merge 3
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
(branch merge, don't forget to commit)
$ hg status -A
M x
C A
$ cd ..
################################
test for linear updates
################################
test for rename awareness of case-folding collision check:
(1) colliding file is one renamed from collided file
$ hg init linearupdate_renameaware_1
$ cd linearupdate_renameaware_1
$ echo a > a
$ hg add a
$ hg commit -m '#0'
$ hg rename a tmp
$ hg rename tmp A
$ hg commit -m '#1'
$ hg update 0
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ echo 'this is added line' >> a
$ hg update 1
merging a and A to A
0 files updated, 1 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ hg status -A
M A
$ cat A
a
this is added line
$ cd ..
(2) colliding file is not related to collided file
$ hg init linearupdate_renameaware_2
$ cd linearupdate_renameaware_2
$ echo a > a
$ hg add a
$ hg commit -m '#0'
$ hg remove a
$ hg commit -m '#1'
$ echo A > A
$ hg add A
$ hg commit -m '#2'
$ hg update 0
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ hg parents --template '{rev}\n'
0
$ hg status -A
C a
$ cat A
a
$ hg up -qC 2
$ hg update --check 0
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ hg parents --template '{rev}\n'
0
$ hg status -A
C a
$ cat a
a
$ hg update --clean 2
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ hg parents --template '{rev}\n'
2
$ hg status -A
C A
$ cat A
A
$ cd ..
(3) colliding file is not related to collided file: added in working dir
$ hg init linearupdate_renameaware_3
$ cd linearupdate_renameaware_3
$ echo a > a
$ hg add a
$ hg commit -m '#0'
$ hg rename a b
$ hg commit -m '#1'
$ hg update 0
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ echo B > B
$ hg add B
$ hg status
A B
$ hg update
abort: case-folding collision between b and B
[255]
$ hg update --check
abort: uncommitted changes
[255]
$ hg update --clean
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ hg parents --template '{rev}\n'
1
$ hg status -A
C b
$ cat b
a
$ cd ..