localrepo: make supported features manageable in each repositories individually
Before this patch, all localrepositories support same features,
because supported features are managed by the class variable
"supported" of "localrepository".
For example, "largefiles" feature provided by largefiles extension is
recognized as supported, by adding the feature name to "supported" of
"localrepository".
So, commands handling multiple repositories at a time like below
misunderstand that such features are supported also in repositories
not enabling corresponded extensions:
- clone/pull from or push to localhost
- recursive execution in subrepo tree
"reposetup()" can't be used to fix this problem, because it is invoked
after checking whether supported features satisfy ones required in the
target repository.
So, this patch adds the set object named as "featuresetupfuncs" to
"localrepository" to manage hook functions to setup supported features
of each repositories.
If any functions are added to "featuresetupfuncs", they are invoked,
and information about supported features is managed in each
repositories individually.
This patch also adds checking below:
- pull from localhost: whether features supported in the local(= dst)
repository satisfies ones required in the remote(= src)
- push to localhost: whether features supported in the remote(= dst)
repository satisfies ones required in the local(= src)
Managing supported features by the class variable means that there is
no difference of supported features between each instances of
"localrepository" in the same Python process, so such checking is not
needed before this patch.
Even with this patch, if intermediate bundlefile is used as pulling
source, pulling indirectly from the remote repository, which requires
features more than ones supported in the local, can't be prevented,
because bundlefile has no information about "required features" in it.
http://mercurial.selenic.com/bts/issue522
In the merge below, the file "foo" has the same contents in both
parents, but if we look at the file-level history, we'll notice that
the version in p1 is an ancestor of the version in p2. This test makes
sure that we'll use the version from p2 in the manifest of the merge
revision.
$ hg init
$ echo foo > foo
$ hg ci -qAm 'add foo'
$ echo bar >> foo
$ hg ci -m 'change foo'
$ hg backout -r tip -m 'backout changed foo'
reverting foo
changeset 2:4d9e78aaceee backs out changeset 1:b515023e500e
$ hg up -C 0
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ touch bar
$ hg ci -qAm 'add bar'
$ hg merge --debug
searching for copies back to rev 1
unmatched files in local:
bar
resolving manifests
branchmerge: True, force: False, partial: False
ancestor: bbd179dfa0a7, local: 71766447bdbb+, remote: 4d9e78aaceee
foo: remote is newer -> g
getting foo
updating: foo 1/1 files (100.00%)
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
(branch merge, don't forget to commit)
$ hg debugstate | grep foo
n 0 -2 unset foo
$ hg st -A foo
M foo
$ hg ci -m 'merge'
$ hg manifest --debug | grep foo
c6fc755d7e68f49f880599da29f15add41f42f5a 644 foo
$ hg debugindex foo
rev offset length ..... linkrev nodeid p1 p2 (re)
0 0 5 ..... 0 2ed2a3912a0b 000000000000 000000000000 (re)
1 5 9 ..... 1 6f4310b00b9a 2ed2a3912a0b 000000000000 (re)
2 14 5 ..... 2 c6fc755d7e68 6f4310b00b9a 000000000000 (re)