view tests/test-rust-discovery.py @ 45143:5631b0116374

discovery: fix docstring of `outgoing` class

Also, introduce a more correct name `ancestorsof` for what was named
`missingheads` before. For now, we just forward `ancestorsof` to `missingheads`
until all users are changed.

There were some mistakes in the old docstring / name:

* `missingheads` (new name: `ancestorsof`) contains the revs whose ancestors
  are included in the outgoing operation. It may contain non-head revs and revs
  which are already on the remote, so the name "missingheads" is wrong in two
  ways.
* `missing` contains only ancestors of `missingheads`, so not *all nodes*
  present in local but not in remote.
* `common` might not contain all common revs, e.g. not some that are not an
  ancestor of `missingheads`.

It seems like the misleading name have fostered an actual bug (issue6372),
where `outgoing.missingheads` was used assuming that it contains the heads of
the missing changesets.

from __future__ import absolute_import
import unittest

from mercurial import policy

PartialDiscovery = policy.importrust('discovery', member='PartialDiscovery')

try:
    from mercurial.cext import parsers as cparsers
except ImportError:
    cparsers = None

# picked from test-parse-index2, copied rather than imported
# so that it stays stable even if test-parse-index2 changes or disappears.
data_non_inlined = (
    b'\x00\x00\x00\x01\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x01D\x19'
    b'\x00\x07e\x12\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\xff\xff\xff\xff'
    b'\xff\xff\xff\xff\xd1\xf4\xbb\xb0\xbe\xfc\x13\xbd\x8c\xd3\x9d'
    b'\x0f\xcd\xd9;\x8c\x07\x8cJ/\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00'
    b'\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x01D\x19\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\xdf\x00'
    b'\x00\x01q\x00\x00\x00\x01\x00\x00\x00\x01\x00\x00\x00\x00\xff'
    b'\xff\xff\xff\xc1\x12\xb9\x04\x96\xa4Z1t\x91\xdfsJ\x90\xf0\x9bh'
    b'\x07l&\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00'
    b'\x00\x01D\xf8\x00\x00\x00\x00\x01\x1b\x00\x00\x01\xb8\x00\x00'
    b'\x00\x01\x00\x00\x00\x02\x00\x00\x00\x01\xff\xff\xff\xff\x02\n'
    b'\x0e\xc6&\xa1\x92\xae6\x0b\x02i\xfe-\xe5\xbao\x05\xd1\xe7\x00'
    b'\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x01F'
    b'\x13\x00\x00\x00\x00\x01\xec\x00\x00\x03\x06\x00\x00\x00\x01'
    b'\x00\x00\x00\x03\x00\x00\x00\x02\xff\xff\xff\xff\x12\xcb\xeby1'
    b'\xb6\r\x98B\xcb\x07\xbd`\x8f\x92\xd9\xc4\x84\xbdK\x00\x00\x00'
    b'\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00'
)


class fakechangelog(object):
    def __init__(self, idx):
        self.index = idx


class fakerepo(object):
    def __init__(self, idx):
        """Just make so that self.changelog.index is the given idx."""
        self.changelog = fakechangelog(idx)


@unittest.skipIf(
    PartialDiscovery is None or cparsers is None,
    "rustext or the C Extension parsers module "
    "discovery relies on is not available",
)
class rustdiscoverytest(unittest.TestCase):
    """Test the correctness of binding to Rust code.

    This test is merely for the binding to Rust itself: extraction of
    Python variable, giving back the results etc.

    It is not meant to test the algorithmic correctness of the provided
    methods. Hence the very simple embedded index data is good enough.

    Algorithmic correctness is asserted by the Rust unit tests.
    """

    def parseindex(self):
        return cparsers.parse_index2(data_non_inlined, False)[0]

    def repo(self):
        return fakerepo(self.parseindex())

    def testindex(self):
        idx = self.parseindex()
        # checking our assumptions about the index binary data:
        self.assertEqual(
            {i: (r[5], r[6]) for i, r in enumerate(idx)},
            {0: (-1, -1), 1: (0, -1), 2: (1, -1), 3: (2, -1)},
        )

    def testaddcommonsmissings(self):
        disco = PartialDiscovery(self.repo(), [3], True)
        self.assertFalse(disco.hasinfo())
        self.assertFalse(disco.iscomplete())

        disco.addcommons([1])
        self.assertTrue(disco.hasinfo())
        self.assertFalse(disco.iscomplete())

        disco.addmissings([2])
        self.assertTrue(disco.hasinfo())
        self.assertTrue(disco.iscomplete())

        self.assertEqual(disco.commonheads(), {1})

    def testaddmissingsstats(self):
        disco = PartialDiscovery(self.repo(), [3], True)
        self.assertIsNone(disco.stats()['undecided'], None)

        disco.addmissings([2])
        self.assertEqual(disco.stats()['undecided'], 2)

    def testaddinfocommonfirst(self):
        disco = PartialDiscovery(self.repo(), [3], True)
        disco.addinfo([(1, True), (2, False)])
        self.assertTrue(disco.hasinfo())
        self.assertTrue(disco.iscomplete())
        self.assertEqual(disco.commonheads(), {1})

    def testaddinfomissingfirst(self):
        disco = PartialDiscovery(self.repo(), [3], True)
        disco.addinfo([(2, False), (1, True)])
        self.assertTrue(disco.hasinfo())
        self.assertTrue(disco.iscomplete())
        self.assertEqual(disco.commonheads(), {1})

    def testinitnorandom(self):
        PartialDiscovery(self.repo(), [3], True, randomize=False)


if __name__ == '__main__':
    import silenttestrunner

    silenttestrunner.main(__name__)