Mercurial > hg
view tests/test-revert-interactive.t @ 24821:57f1dbc99631 stable
afterlock: add the callback to the top level lock (issue4608)
If 'wlock' is taken, we should add 'afterlock' callback to the 'wlock' instead.
Otherwise, running post transaction hook after 'lock' is release but 'wlock' is
still taken lead to a deadlock (eg: 'hg update' during a hook).
This situation is much more common since: 5dc5cd7abbf5
push: acquire local 'wlock' if "pushback" is expected (BC) (issue4596)
author | Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@fb.com> |
---|---|
date | Mon, 20 Apr 2015 15:27:55 +0200 |
parents | a85c4ed1132f |
children | f37a69ec3f47 |
line wrap: on
line source
Revert interactive tests 1 add and commit file f 2 add commit file folder1/g 3 add and commit file folder2/h 4 add and commit file folder1/i 5 commit change to file f 6 commit changes to files folder1/g folder2/h 7 commit changes to files folder1/g folder2/h 8 revert interactive to commit id 2 (line 3 above), check that folder1/i is removed and 9 make workdir match 7 10 run the same test than 8 from within folder1 and check same expectations $ cat <<EOF >> $HGRCPATH > [ui] > interactive = true > [extensions] > record = > EOF $ mkdir -p a/folder1 a/folder2 $ cd a $ hg init >>> open('f', 'wb').write("1\n2\n3\n4\n5\n") $ hg add f ; hg commit -m "adding f" $ cat f > folder1/g ; hg add folder1/g ; hg commit -m "adding folder1/g" $ cat f > folder2/h ; hg add folder2/h ; hg commit -m "adding folder2/h" $ cat f > folder1/i ; hg add folder1/i ; hg commit -m "adding folder1/i" >>> open('f', 'wb').write("a\n1\n2\n3\n4\n5\nb\n") $ hg commit -m "modifying f" >>> open('folder1/g', 'wb').write("c\n1\n2\n3\n4\n5\nd\n") $ hg commit -m "modifying folder1/g" >>> open('folder2/h', 'wb').write("e\n1\n2\n3\n4\n5\nf\n") $ hg commit -m "modifying folder2/h" $ hg tip changeset: 6:59dd6e4ab63a tag: tip user: test date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000 summary: modifying folder2/h $ hg revert -i -r 2 --all -- << EOF > y > y > y > y > y > n > n > EOF reverting f reverting folder1/g (glob) removing folder1/i (glob) reverting folder2/h (glob) diff -r 89ac3d72e4a4 f 2 hunks, 2 lines changed examine changes to 'f'? [Ynesfdaq?] y @@ -1,6 +1,5 @@ -a 1 2 3 4 5 record change 1/6 to 'f'? [Ynesfdaq?] y @@ -2,6 +1,5 @@ 1 2 3 4 5 -b record change 2/6 to 'f'? [Ynesfdaq?] y diff -r 89ac3d72e4a4 folder1/g 2 hunks, 2 lines changed examine changes to 'folder1/g'? [Ynesfdaq?] y @@ -1,6 +1,5 @@ -c 1 2 3 4 5 record change 3/6 to 'folder1/g'? [Ynesfdaq?] y @@ -2,6 +1,5 @@ 1 2 3 4 5 -d record change 4/6 to 'folder1/g'? [Ynesfdaq?] n diff -r 89ac3d72e4a4 folder2/h 2 hunks, 2 lines changed examine changes to 'folder2/h'? [Ynesfdaq?] n $ cat f 1 2 3 4 5 $ cat folder1/g 1 2 3 4 5 d $ cat folder2/h e 1 2 3 4 5 f Test that --interactive lift the need for --all $ echo q | hg revert -i -r 2 reverting folder1/g (glob) reverting folder2/h (glob) diff -r 89ac3d72e4a4 folder1/g 1 hunks, 1 lines changed examine changes to 'folder1/g'? [Ynesfdaq?] q abort: user quit [255] $ rm folder1/g.orig $ hg update -C 6 3 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ hg revert -i -r 2 --all -- << EOF > y > y > y > y > y > n > n > EOF reverting f reverting folder1/g (glob) removing folder1/i (glob) reverting folder2/h (glob) diff -r 89ac3d72e4a4 f 2 hunks, 2 lines changed examine changes to 'f'? [Ynesfdaq?] y @@ -1,6 +1,5 @@ -a 1 2 3 4 5 record change 1/6 to 'f'? [Ynesfdaq?] y @@ -2,6 +1,5 @@ 1 2 3 4 5 -b record change 2/6 to 'f'? [Ynesfdaq?] y diff -r 89ac3d72e4a4 folder1/g 2 hunks, 2 lines changed examine changes to 'folder1/g'? [Ynesfdaq?] y @@ -1,6 +1,5 @@ -c 1 2 3 4 5 record change 3/6 to 'folder1/g'? [Ynesfdaq?] y @@ -2,6 +1,5 @@ 1 2 3 4 5 -d record change 4/6 to 'folder1/g'? [Ynesfdaq?] n diff -r 89ac3d72e4a4 folder2/h 2 hunks, 2 lines changed examine changes to 'folder2/h'? [Ynesfdaq?] n $ cat f 1 2 3 4 5 $ cat folder1/g 1 2 3 4 5 d $ cat folder2/h e 1 2 3 4 5 f $ hg st M f M folder1/g R folder1/i $ hg revert --interactive f << EOF > y > y > n > n > EOF diff -r 59dd6e4ab63a f 2 hunks, 2 lines changed examine changes to 'f'? [Ynesfdaq?] y @@ -1,5 +1,6 @@ +a 1 2 3 4 5 record change 1/2 to 'f'? [Ynesfdaq?] y @@ -1,5 +2,6 @@ 1 2 3 4 5 +b record change 2/2 to 'f'? [Ynesfdaq?] n $ hg st M f M folder1/g R folder1/i ? f.orig $ cat f a 1 2 3 4 5 $ cat f.orig 1 2 3 4 5